Remedying Students’ Misconceptions in Learning of Chemical Bonding and Spontaneity through Intervention Discussion Learning Model (IDLM)

Authors: Ihuarulam Ambrose Ikenna

Abstract:

In the past few decades, the field of chemistry education has grown tremendously and researches indicated that after traditional chemistry instruction students often lacked deep conceptual understanding and failed to integrate their ideas into coherent conceptual framework. For several concepts in chemistry, students at all levels have demonstrated difficulty in changing their initial perceptions. Their perceptions are most often wrong and don't agree with correct scientific concepts. This study explored the effectiveness of intervention discussion sections for a college general chemistry course designed to apply research on students preconceptions, knowledge integration and student explanation. Three interventions discussions lasting three hours on bond energy and spontaneity were done tested and intervention (treatment) students’ performances were compared with that of control group which did not use the experimental pedagogy. Results indicated that this instruction which was capable of identifying students' misconceptions, initial conceptions and integrating those ideas into class discussion led to enhanced conceptual understanding and better achievement for the experimental group.

Keywords: Intervention Discussion Learning Model, Learning, Remedying, Students’ misconceptions.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100256

References:

[1] H.K. Boo, “Students understanding of chemical bonds and the energeting of chemical reactions” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33, (19-581), 1998.
[2] A. Hapkiewz, “Clarifying chemical bonding: Overcoming our misconceptions” The Science Teacher, 58 (3) 24-27, 1991
[3] M.A. Teichert& A.M. Stacy, “Promoting understanding of chemical bonding and spontaneity through student explanations and integration of ideas” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 464 – 496, 2002.
[4] M.A. Teichert, “Promoting understanding of Thermodynamics: The role of student explanation and integration of ideas” Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
[5] P.L. Thomas, and R.W. Schwenz, “College physical chemistry students conceptions of equilibrium and fundamental thermodynamics” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1151–1160, 1988.
[6] C. Furio, and M.L. Calatayud, “Difficulties with the geometry and polarity of molecules” Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 36-41, 1996
[7] A. Erylimaz, “Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussion on students misconceptions and achievements regarding force and motions” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30 (10), 1001- 1015, 2002.
[8] J.D. Herron, “The chemistry classroom: Formulas for successful teaching science a view from studies of science learning” Science Education, 72, 597-614, 1996.
[9] J.D. Novak, “Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate prepositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners” Science Education, 86, 548-571, 2002.
[10] W. David, W. Heather, A. Shaawn, and H.O. Clare, On becoming a tutor toward and ontogenetic 9 model technical report, 12 Ajw @ Psychology Nottingham ac UK, 1995
[11] V.N. Ejeizie, “Effects of peer tutoring on senior secondary school students’ achievement in chemical” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, NnamdiAzikiwe University Awka, Nigeria, 2005.