Alignment between Understanding and Assessment Practice among Secondary School Teachers
This study aimed to identify the alignment of understanding and assessment practices among secondary school teachers. The study was carried out using quantitative descriptive study. The sample consisted of 164 teachers who taught Form 1 and 2 from 11 secondary schools in the district of North Kinta, Perak, Malaysia. Data were obtained from 164 respondents who answered Expectation Alignment Understanding and Practices of School Assessment (PEKDAPS) questionnaire. The data were analysed using SPSS 17.0+. The Cronbach’s alpha value obtained through PEKDAPS questionnaire pilot study was 0.86. The results showed that teachers' performance in PEKDAPS based on the mean value was less than 3, which means that perfect alignment does not occur between the understanding and practices of school assessment. Two major PEKDAPS sub-constructs of articulation across grade and age and usability of the system were higher than the moderate alignment of the understanding and practices of school assessment (Min=2.0). The content focused of PEKDAPs sub-constructs which showed lower than the moderate alignment of the understanding and practices of school assessment (Min=2.0). Another two PEKDAPS subconstructs of transparency and fairness and the pedagogical implications showed moderate alignment (2.0). The implications of the study is that teachers need to fully understand the importance of alignment among components of assessment, learning and teaching and learning objectives as strategies to achieve quality assessment process.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1100206Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1644
 Baker, E. L., Freeman, M., & Clayton, S. (1991) Cognitive assessment of history for large-scale testing. In M. C. Wittrock & E. L. Baker (Eds.), Testing and cognition (pp. 131-153). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 Biggs, J.B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 1-18.
 Cohen, S.A. (1987). 'Instructional alignment: Searching for a magic bullet', Educational Researcher 16(8), 16--20.
 Faizah A Majid (2011) School-based Assessment in Malaysian Schools: The Concerns of the English Teachers, Journal of US-China Education Review, Vol.8, No.10.
 Grima. G (2003) School-Based Assessment: Implementation Issues and Practices, Paper presented at the 21st Annual AEAA Conference: Assessment and Certification in a Changing Educational, Economic & Social Context Cape Town, South Africa.
 Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2012), Kad Pelaporan Pelaksanaan Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan 2006-2010, Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/?id=21&act=research&rid=3
 Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013) Portal Rasmi Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/
 Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia (2012), Buku Panduan Pengurusan dan Pengendalian Pentaksiran Berasaskan sekolah (PBS), Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/lp/index.php/component/content/article/53/216- pentaksiran berasaskan-sekolah
 Moss, P. (2003). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 13-25.
 Moss, P. (1992), ‘Shifting Conceptions of Validity in Educational Measurement: Implications for performance assessment’, Review of Educational Research, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 229– 258.
 Newmann, F. M. (1993). Beyond common sense in educational restructuring: The issues of content and linkage. Educational Researcher, 22(2), pp. 4-13, 22
 Pentaksiran Berasaskan sekolah (PBS), Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/lp/index.php/component/content/article/53/216- pentaksiran berasaskan-sekolah
 Spady, W. (1994). Outcomes-based education: critical Issues. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
 Ventura, F. and Murphy, R. (1998) The impact of measures to promote equity in the secondary education certificate examinations in Malta: an evaluation. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 3, 1.
 Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessment in mathematics and science education. (Research Monograph No. 6). Washington: National Institute for Science Education Publications.