Evaluating the Use of Digital Art Tools for Drawing to Enhance Artistic Ability and Improve Digital Skill among Junior School Students
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Evaluating the Use of Digital Art Tools for Drawing to Enhance Artistic Ability and Improve Digital Skill among Junior School Students

Authors: Aber S. Aboalgasm, Rupert Ward

Abstract:

This study investigated some results of the use of digital art tools by junior school children in order to discover if these tools could promote artistic ability and creativity. The study considers the ease of use and usefulness of the tools as well as how to assess artwork produced by digital means. As the use of these tools is a relatively new development in Art education, this study may help educators in their choice of which tools to use and when to use them. The study also aims to present a model for the assessment of students’ artistic development and creativity by studying their artistic activity. This model can help in determining differences in students’ creative ability and could be useful both for teachers, as a means of assessing digital artwork, and for students, by providing the motivation to use the tools to their fullest extent. Sixteen students aged nine to ten years old were observed and recorded while they used the digital drawing tools. The study found that, according to the students’ own statements, it was not the ease of use but the successful effects the tools provided which motivated the children to use them.

Keywords: Artistic ability, creativity, drawing digital tool, TAM model, psychomotor domain.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099938

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2819

References:


[1] B. Gimbert, and D. Cristol, “Teaching curriculum with technology: Enhancing children’s technological competence during early childhood,” Early Childhood Education Journal, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 207–216, 2004.
[2] D. H. Clements, and J. Sarama, “Teaching with computers in early childhood education: Strategies and professional development”, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 215–226, 2002.
[3] C. H. Faber, “Digital Drawing Tablet to Traditional Drawing on Paper”, Iowa State University, College of Design, 2009.
[4] J. Matthews, and P. Seow, “Electronic paint: Understanding children’s representation through their interactions with digital paint”, Journal of Art Design, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 251–263, 2007.
[5] L. J. Couse, and D. W. Chen “A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education”, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 43, no. 1, p. 75, 2010.
[6] P. Markopoulos, and M. Bekker, “Interaction design and children”, Interacting with Computers, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 141-149, 2003.
[7] J. W. Creswell, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2009.
[8] A. Clark, S. McQuail, et al., “Exploring the field of listening to and consulting with young children,” (2003).
[9] A. Greig and J. Taylor J., Doing Research with Children, Sage Publications, London, 1999.
[10] B. G. Glaser, A. L. Strauss, “The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research”. New York: Aldine 1967.
[11] A. Aber and W. Rupert and G . Jonathan, “The use and effect of Digital Art Tools in Developing Artistic Ability in Children Aged 9-10” University of Huddersfield. The international Journal of the eamge. Volum 4, www.ontheimage.com Common Ground, 2014.
[12] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. 1989.
[13] A. Aber and W. Rupert “The Potential of Digital Tools in Art Lessons at Junior School Level to Improve Artistic Ability Using Tamazight Fonts’’ International Journal of Social, Management, Economics and Business Engineering Vol:8 No:3, 2014
[14] S. Elizabeth “Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives”. The psychomotor domain taxonomy & Dave’s model 1970. http://www.businessballs.com/bloomstaxonomyoflearningdomains.htm
[15] K. K. Urban, and H. G. Jellen, “Assessing creative potential via drawing production: The Test for Creative Thinking - Drawing Production (TCTDP)”, in A. J. Cropley, K. K. Urban, H. Wagner and W. Wieczerkowski (Eds.), Giftedness: A Continuing Worldwide Challenge, New York, NY: Trillium, 1986, pp. 163-169).
[16] A. Maslow, “Motivation and personality.” New York, NY: Harper. p. 236.ISBN 0-06-041987-3,1954.