Application of a Theoretical Framework as a Context for a Travel Behavior Change Policy Intervention

Authors: F. Moghtaderi, M. Burke, J. Troelsen

Abstract:

There has been a significant decline in active travel and a massive increase in the use of car dependent travel in many countries during the past two decades. Evidential risks for people’s physical and mental health problems are correlated with this increased use of motorized travel. These health related problems range from overweight and obesity to increased air pollution. In response to these rising concerns health professionals, traffic planers, local authorities and others have introduced a variety of initiatives to counterbalance the dominance of cars for daily journeys. However, the nature of travel behavior change interventions, which aim to reduce car use, are very complex and challenging regarding their interactions with human behavior. To change travel behavior at least two aspects have to be taken into consideration. First, how to alter attitudes and perceptions toward the sustainable and healthy modes of travel, in competition with experiences of private car use. And second, how to make these behavior change processes irreversible and sustainable. There are no comprehensive models available to guide policy interventions to increase the level of success of travel behavior change interventions across both these dimensions. A comprehensive theoretical framework is required in the effort to optimize how to facilitate and guide the processes of data collection and analysis to achieve the best possible guidelines for policy makers. Regarding the gaps in the travel behavior change research literature, this paper attempted to identify and suggest a multidimensional framework in order to facilitate planning the implemented travel behavior change interventions. A structured mixed-method model is suggested to improve the analytic power of the results according to the complexity of human behavior. In order to recognize people’s attitudes towards a specific travel mode, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was operationalized. But in order to capture decision making processes the Transtheoretical model of Behavior Change (TTM) was also used. Consequently, the combination of these two theories (TTM and TPB) has resulted in a synthesis with appropriate concepts to identify and design an implemented travel behavior change interventions.

Keywords: Behavior change theories, Theoretical framework, Travel behavior change interventions.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099924

References:

[1] Killoran, A., et al., Transport interventions promoting safe cycling and walking: evidence briefing. 2006, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: London.
[2] Anable, J., ‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy, 2005. 12(1): p. 65-78.
[3] Anderson, K.F. and P. Auspos, Community Change: Theories, Practice, and Evidence, in Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change. Community Change: Theories, Practice, and Evidence. 2006: The Aspen Institute encourages.
[4] Seethaler, R. and G. Rose, Using the Six Principles of Persuasion to Promote Travel Behaviour Change: Findings of a TravelSmart Pilot Test. Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand, 2006. 15: p. 94-106.
[5] Geller, E.S., Applied Behavior Analysis and Social Marketing: An Integration for Environmental Preservation. Journal of Social Issues, 1989. 45(1): p. 17-36.
[6] Mikiki, F. and P. Papaioannou, A proposal for more efficient travel behaviour change interventions, in Transport Research Arena (TRA). 2014: Ference, Paris.
[7] Andersen, L., et al., An intermittent running test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake: the Andersen test. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2008. 48: p. 434 - 437.
[8] Fyhri, A. and R. Hjorthol, Children’s independent mobility to school, friends and leisure activities. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009. 17(5): p. 377-384.
[9] Garrard, J., Active Transport: Children and young people - an overview of recent evidence. 2009, VicHealth: Melbourne.
[10] Moghtaderi, F., et al., Understanding Australian Parents’ Attitudes About their Children’s Travel Behaviour: Results from the CATCH and iMATCH projects, in State of Australian Cities Conference 2013, State of Australian Cities Research Network: Sydney/ NSW.
[11] Naylor, P. and H. McKay, Prevention in the first place: schools a setting for action on physical inactivity. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009. 43.
[12] Blair-Stevens, C., et al., Helpdesk Research Report: Literature and debates around behaviour change. 2012: GSDRC.
[13] Ajzen, I., From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, in Action Control, J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann, Editors. 1985, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 11-39.
[14] 14. Ajzen, I., Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2002. 32(4): p. 665-683.
[15] Godin, G. and G. Kok, The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of Its Applications to Health-related Behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1996. 11(2): p. 87-98.
[16] CPRC. The transtheoretical model of behavior change. 2004 (cited 2013 July); Available from: www.cba.uri.edu/Scholl/Notes/TTM.html.
[17] Ajzen, I., Nature and Operation of Attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001. 52: p. 27-58.
[18] 18. Lenio, J.A., Analysis of the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change. UW-Stout Journal of Student Research, 2006: p. 73-86.
[19] Prochaska, J.O. and C. C.DiClemente, Stages and processes of selfchange of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change,. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,, 1983. 51: p. 390-395.
[20] Velicer, W.F., et al. Detailed Overview of the Transtheoretical Model. 1998; Available from: http://www.uri.edu/research/cprc/transtheoretical.htm.
[21] Prochaska, J.O. and W.F. Velicer, The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1997. 12(1): p. 38-48.
[22] Health Promotion Unit, Stages of behaviour change, in Queensland Stay On Your Feet. 2007, Community Good Practice Toolkit. Division of Chief Health Officer-Queensland Health.
[23] Marcus, B.H., et al., The stages and processes of exercise adoption and maintenance in a worksite sample. Health Psychol, 1992. 11(6): p. 386- 95.
[24] Grizzell, J. Behavior Change Theories and Models. last web page update: 2007; Available from: http://www.csupomona.edu/~jvgrizzell/ best_practices/bctheory.html.
[25] Ajzen, I., Behavioral interventions: Design and evaluation guided by the theory of planned behavior.
[26] Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein, Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 2000. 11(1): p. 1-33.
[27] Ajzen, I. and S. Sheikh, Action versus inaction: anticipated affect in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2013. 43: p. 155–162.
[28] Ajzen, I., et al., Knowledge and the Prediction of Behavior: The Role of Information Accuracy in the Theory of Planned Behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2011. 33(2): p. 101-117.
[29] Kitzinger, J., Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 1995. 311(7000): p. 299-302.
[30] Powell, R.A. and H.M. Single, Focus Groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1996. 8(5): p. 499-504.