Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30579
Ceramic Employees’ Occupational Health and Safety Training Expectations in Turkey

Authors: Erol Karaca

Abstract:

This study aims to analyze ceramic employees’ occupational health and safety training expectations. To that general objective, the study tries to examine whether occupational health and safety training expectations of ceramic employees meaningfully differentiate depending on demographic features and professional, social and economic conditions. For this purpose, a questionnaire was developed by the researcher. The research data were collected through this questionnaire called “Questionnaire of Occupational Health and Safety Training Expectation” (QSOHSTE). QSOHSTE was applied to 125 ceramic employees working in Kütahya, Turkey. Data obtained from questionnaire were analyzed via SPSS 21. The findings, obtained from the study, revealed that employees’ agreement level to occupational health and safety training expectation statements is generally high-level. The findings reveal that employees expect professional interest such as increased development and investment, preventive measures for accidents, interventions to evaluate the working conditions, establishment of safe working environments and sustainment of adequate equipment for occupational health and safety training process. Besides these findings, employees’ agreement level to occupational health and safety training expectation statements also varies in terms of educational level, professional seniority, income level and perception of economic condition.

Keywords: Occupational Health and Safety, occupational expectation, Occupational Training

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099906

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2023

References:


[1] M. F. Turgut (1977). “Attitudes Measurement: Measurement Techniques in Education”. Hacettepe University Publications No. 7, Ankara, Turkey.
[2] A. Tezbaşaran (1996). “Likert Type Scale Developing Guide”. TPD Publications, Ankara, Turkey.
[3] Y. Baykul (2000). “Measurement in Education and Physiology: Classic Test Theory and Its Application”. ÖSYM Publications, Ankara, Turkey.
[4] Ş. Büyüköztürk (2002). “Data Analysis Handbook for Social Sciences”. Pegem A Publishing, Ankara, Turkey.
[5] R.L., Gorsuch (1974). “Factor Analysis”. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
[6] H. B., Lee and A.L. Comrey, (1979). “Distortions in a Commonly Used Factor Analytic Procedure”. Multivariate Behavioral Res., 14: 301-321.
[7] R. F. Scherer, F. A. Wiebe, D. C. Luther and J. S. Adams (1988). “Dimensionality of Coping: Factor Stability Using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire”, Psychological Reports, 62: 763-770.
[8] A. Balcı (1995). “The Research in Social Sciences”. Ankara University Education Sciences Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
[9] Büyüköztürk, 2002.