The Use of Palm Kernel Shell and Ash for Concrete Production

Authors: J. E. Oti, J. M. Kinuthia, R. Robinson, P. Davies

Abstract:

This work reports the potential of using Palm Kernel (PK) ash and shell as a partial substitute for Portland Cement (PC) and coarse aggregate in the development of mortar and concrete. PK ash and shell are agro-waste materials from palm oil mills, the disposal of PK ash and shell is an environmental problem of concern. The PK ash has pozzolanic properties that enables it as a partial replacement for cement and also plays an important role in the strength and durability of concrete, its use in concrete will alleviate the increasing challenges of scarcity and high cost of cement. In order to investigate the PC replacement potential of PK ash, three types of PK ash were produced at varying temperature (350-750C) and they were used to replace up to 50% PC. The PK shell was used to replace up to 100% coarse aggregate in order to study its aggregate replacement potential. The testing programme included material characterisation, the determination of compressive strength, tensile splitting strength and chemical durability in aggressive sulfatebearing exposure conditions. The 90 day compressive results showed a significant strength gain (up to 26.2 N/mm2). The Portland cement and conventional coarse aggregate has significantly higher influence in the strength gain compared to the equivalent PK ash and PK shell. The chemical durability results demonstrated that after a prolonged period of exposure, significant strength losses in all the concretes were observed. This phenomenon is explained, due to lower change in concrete morphology and inhibition of reaction species and the final disruption of the aggregate cement paste matrix.

Keywords: Sustainability, Concrete, mortar, Palm kernel shell, compressive strength, consistency.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099630

References:

[1] Alengaram J. U, Jumaat M.Z and Mahmud H., 2010. Comparison of mechanical and bond properties of oil palm kernel shell concrete with normal weight concrete. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 5(8), p. 1231-1239.
[2] Alengaram J. U, Jumaat M.Z and Mahmud H., 2008. Ductility Behaviour of Reinforced Palm Kernel Shell Concrete Beams. European Journal of Scientific Research 23(3), p.406-420
[3] Mannan M.A and Ganapathy C., 2002. Engineering properties of concrete with oil palm shell as coarse aggregate. Construction and Building Materials 16, p29-3
[4] Shafigh P, Jumaat M.Z, Mahmud H.B and Alengaram U.J., 2011. A new method of producing high strength oil palm shell lightweight concrete. Materials & Design 32(10), p. 4839–4843.
[5] BS EN 197-1:2011.Cement Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements.
[6] PD 6682-1:2009. Aggregates – Part 1: Aggregates for concrete – Guidance on the use of BS EN 12620
[7] BS EN 12620:2002 +A1:2008. Aggregates for concrete
[8] BS EN 933-1:1997. Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates Part 1: Determination of particle size distribution — Sieving method
[9] BS EN1097-6:2000. Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates — Part 6: Determination of particle density and water absorption
[10] BS EN 933-3:1997. Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates - Part 3: Determination of particle shape - Flakiness index
[11] EN 933-4:2008. Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates Part 4: Determination of particle shape — Shape index
[12] BS 812-112: 1990. Testing aggregates — Part 112: Methods for determination of aggregate impact value (AIV)
[13] Oti J.E., Kinuthia J.M, Bai J, Delpak R and Snelson D.G., 2010. Engineering properties of concrete made with slate waste. Construction materials 163 (3), p.131-142.
[14] Oti J.E., Kinuthia J.M, and Bai J., 2010. Sustainable masonry mortar for brick joint and plaster in the UK. Construction materials 163 (2), p87-96
[15] BS BS EN 206-1:2000. Concrete - Part 1: Specification, performance, production and conformity
[16] BS EN 12350-1:2009. Testing fresh concrete Part 1: Sampling.
[17] BS EN 12390-1:2009.Testing hardened Concrete. Part 1: Shape, dimensions and other requirements of specimens and moulds
[18] BS EN 12350-2:2009. Testing fresh concrete Part 2: Slump-test.
[19] BS EN 12350-4:2009. Testing fresh concrete Part 4: Degree of compactability
[20] BS EN 1015-3:1990. Methods of test for mortar for masonry, Part 3: Determination of consistence of fresh mortar by flow Table.
[21] BS EN 12390-2:2009.Testing hardened Concrete. Part 2: Making and curing specimens for strength tests.
[22] BS EN 12390-3:2009.Testing hardened Concrete. Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens.
[23] BS EN 12390-4:2009.Testing hardened Concrete. Part 4: Compressive strength - Specification for testing machines.
[24] BS EN 12390-6:2009.Testing hardened Concrete. Part 6: Tensile splitting strength of test specimens.
[25] BS EN 413-2: 2005 Masonry cement, Part 2: Test methods.
[26] Bai J., Wild S., Sabir B. B., 2003. Chloride ingress and strength loss in concrete with different MK-PFA-PC binder compositions exposed to synthetic seawater. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(3):353–62.
[27] Trindade JR, Visak ZP, Blesic M, Marrucho IM, Coutinho JAP, Canongia Lopes JN and Rebelo LPN (2007) Salting-out effects in aqueous ionic liquid solutions – cloud-point temperature shifts. Journal of Physical Chemistry B published online 01/27/2007 page EST: 4.6 path.web.ua.pt.
[28] Bassuoni MT and Nehdi ML., 2009. Durability of self-consolidating concrete to sulfate attack under combined cyclic environments and flexural loading. Cement and Concrete Research 39(3): 206–226.
[29] Chatveera B and Lertwattanaruk P (2009) Evaluation of sulfate resistance of cement mortars containing black rice husk ash. Journal of Environmental Management 90(3): 1435–1441.
[30] O’Farrell M, Wild S and Sabir BB (1999) Resistance to chemical attack of ground brick – PC mortar Part I. Sodium sulphate solution. Cement and Concrete Research 29(11): 1781–1790.