Size-Reduction Strategies for Iris Codes
Authors: Jutta Hämmerle-Uhl, Georg Penn, Gerhard Pötzelsberger, Andreas Uhl
Abstract:
Iris codes contain bits with different entropy. This work investigates different strategies to reduce the size of iris code templates with the aim of reducing storage requirements and computational demand in the matching process. Besides simple subsampling schemes, also a binary multi-resolution representation as used in the JBIG hierarchical coding mode is assessed. We find that iris code template size can be reduced significantly while maintaining recognition accuracy. Besides, we propose a two-stage identification approach, using small-sized iris code templates in a pre-selection stage, and full resolution templates for final identification, which shows promising recognition behaviour.
Keywords: Iris recognition, compact iris code, fast matching, best bits, pre-selection identification, two-stage identification.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099262
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1786References:
[1] M.J. Burge and K. Bowyer, editors. Handbook of Iris Recognition. Springer-Verlag, 2013.
[2] J. E. Gentile, N. Ratha, and J. Connell. SLIC: Short Length Iris Code. In BTAS’09: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international conference on Biometrics: Theory, applications and systems, pages 171–175, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2009. IEEE Press.
[3] K. P. Hollingsworth, K. W. Bowyer, and P. J. Flynn. The best bits in an iris code. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(6):964–973, 2009.
[4] Mario Konrad, Herbert St¨ogner, Andreas Uhl, and Peter Wild. Computationally efficient serial combination of rotation-invariant and rotation compensating iris recognition algorithms. In P. Richard and J. Braz, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, VISAPP’10, volume 1, pages 85–90, Angers, France, May 2010.
[5] L. Ma, T. Tan, Y. Wang, and D. Zhang. Efficient iris recognition by characterizing key local variations. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13:739–750, 2004.
[6] C.-H. Park and J.-J. Lee. Extracting and combining multimodal iris features. In Proceedings of the 1st IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB’06), number 3832 in Lecture Notes on Computer Science, pages 389–396, 2006.
[7] R. Pfarrhofer and A. Uhl. Selective image encryption using JBIG. In J. Dittmann, S. Katzenbeisser, and A. Uhl, editors, Communicationa and Multimedia Security (Proceedings of CMS 2005), volume 3677 of Lecture Notes on Computer Science, pages 98–107, Salzburg, Austria, September 2005. Springer-Verlag.
[8] Christian Rathgeb, Andreas Uhl, and Peter Wild. Incremental iris recognition: A single-algorithm serial fusion strategy to optimize time complexity. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Application, and Systems 2010 (IEEE BTAS’10), pages 1–6, Washington DC, DC, USA, September 2010. IEEE Press.
[9] Christian Rathgeb, Andreas Uhl, and Peter Wild. Iris Recognition: From Segmentation to Template Security, volume 59 of Advances in Information Security. Springer Verlag, 2013.
[10] Z. Sun, Y. Wang, T. Tan, and J. Cui. Improving iris recognition accuracy via cascaded classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 35(3):435–441, 2005.
[11] P.-F. Zhang, D.-S. Li, and Q. Wang. A novel iris recognition method based on feature fusion. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, pages 3661–3665, 2004.