Speech Acts and Politeness Strategies in an EFL Classroom in Georgia
Authors: Tinatin Kurdghelashvili
Abstract:
The paper deals with the usage of speech acts and politeness strategies in an EFL classroom in Georgia (Rep of). It explores the students’ and the teachers’ practice of the politeness strategies and the speech acts of apology, thanking, request, compliment / encouragement, command, agreeing / disagreeing, addressing and code switching. The research method includes observation as well as a questionnaire. The target group involves the students from Georgian public schools and two certified, experienced local English teachers. The analysis is based on Searle’s Speech Act Theory and Brown and Levinson’s politeness strategies. The findings show that the students have certain knowledge regarding politeness yet they fail to apply them in English communication. In addition, most of the speech acts from the classroom interaction are used by the teachers and not the students. Thereby, it is suggested that teachers should cultivate the students’ communicative competence and attempt to give them opportunities to practise more English speech acts than they do today.
Keywords: English as a foreign language, Georgia, politeness principles, speech acts.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338098
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 6196References:
[1] I. Krasner, “The role of culture in language teaching,” Dialog on Language Instruction, vol.13, no.1-2, 79-89,1999.
[2] C. Leung, “Convivial communication: recontextualizing communicative competence,” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vo.15, no.2, 119-144.
[3] M. Canale, “From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy,”in Language and Communication, J. Richards and R. Schmidt, Eds. London, Longman,1983, pp.2-27.
[4] L. Bachman, Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
[5] S. Rathert, “The Language Outside and Inside the Foreign Language Classroom: Speech Act Theory and Discourse Analysis,” The Internet Journal Language, Culture and Society, issue 36, 81-87, 2013
[6] J. L. Austin, How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962, pp.101.
[7] J.R.Searle, Expression and meaning: Studies in the history of speech acts. Cambridge University Press, 1979, pp 31-32.
[8] G. N. Leech, Principles of Pragmatics. London. Longman, 1983.
[9] H. P. Grice, Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
[10] P. Brown and S. Levinson, Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press, 1978, 1987.
[11] (http://www.advantour.com/georgia/traditions/hospitality.htm).
[12] M. N. Brock, Y. Nagasaka, “Teaching pragmatics in the EFL classroom? Sure you can, “TESL Reporter, vol. 38, no.1, 17-26, 2005.
[13] S. Ide, “Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness,” Multilingua, vol.8, no. 2-3, 223-248.
[14] S. Blum-Kulka, “The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society,”in Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, R.J. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich, Eds. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter, 1992, pp. 255- 280.