Evaluation of Expected Annual Loss Probabilities of RC Moment Resisting Frames

Authors: Saemee Jun, Dong-Hyeon Shin, Tae-Sang Ahn, Hyung-Joon Kim

Abstract:

Building loss estimation methodologies which have been advanced considerably in recent decades are usually used to estimate socio and economic impacts resulting from seismic structural damage. In accordance with these methods, this paper presents the evaluation of an annual loss probability of a reinforced concrete moment resisting frame designed according to Korean Building Code. The annual loss probability is defined by (1) a fragility curve obtained from a capacity spectrum method which is similar to a method adopted from HAZUS, and (2) a seismic hazard curve derived from annual frequencies of exceedance per peak ground acceleration. Seismic fragilities are computed to calculate the annual loss probability of a certain structure using functions depending on structural capacity, seismic demand, structural response and the probability of exceeding damage state thresholds. This study carried out a nonlinear static analysis to obtain the capacity of a RC moment resisting frame selected as a prototype building. The analysis results show that the probability of being extensive structural damage in the prototype building is expected to 0.01% in a year.

Keywords: Expected annual loss, Loss estimation, RC structure, Fragility analysis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099206

References:

[1] AIK, Korean Building Code for Structures.Seoul: Architectural Institute of Korea, 2009
[2] ASCE, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA.: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.
[3] A. J. Carr, Ruaumoko Manual. User Manual for the 2-Dimensional Version: Ruaumoko2D Vol. 2. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 2009.
[4] M. Teraoka, S. Fujii, “Seismic damage and performance evaluation of R/C beam-column joints,” in Proc. the Second U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Hokkaido, 2000, pp. 379-390
[5] Ministry of Construction and Transportation, Study on seismic design code, Enhancing seismic performance. Seoul: Ministry of Construction and Transportation, 1997.
[6] FEMA, HAZUS-MH MR4 technical manual, multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model.Washington D. C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2003.
[7] C. A. Kircher, A. A. Nassar, O. Kustu, W. T. Holmes, “Development of Building Damage Functions for Earthquake Loss Estimation,” Earthquake Spectra, 13, (4), 1997.
[8] NEMA, Development of the Seismic Fragility Function for Buildings in Korea, Seoul: National Emergency Management Agency in Korea, 2009.
[9] FEMA, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 356 report.Washington D. C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
[10] S, Jun, D. Shin, H. Kim, "Annual Loss Probability Estimation of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames(SMRFs) using Seismic Fragility Analysis,"Journal of Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, Vol. 27, (6), 2014
[11] ATC, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings Vol. 1, ATC-40 report.Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council, 1996.
[12] FEMA, Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage – A Practical Guide, FEMA E-74 report. Washington D. C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2011.