CPT Pore Water Pressure Correlations with PDA to Identify Pile Drivability Problem

Authors: Fauzi Jarushi, Paul Cosentino, Edward Kalajian, Hadeel Dekhn

Abstract:

At certain depths during large diameter displacement pile driving, rebound well over 0.25 inches was experienced, followed by a small permanent-set during each hammer blow. High pile rebound (HPR) soils may stop the pile driving and results in a limited pile capacity. In some cases, rebound leads to pile damage, delaying the construction project, and the requiring foundations redesign. HPR was evaluated at seven Florida sites, during driving of square precast, prestressed concrete piles driven into saturated, fine silty to clayey sands and sandy clays. Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) deflection versus time data recorded during installation, was used to develop correlations between cone penetrometer (CPT) pore-water pressures, pile displacements and rebound. At five sites where piles experienced excessive HPR with minimal set, the pore pressure yielded very high positive values of greater than 20 tsf. However, at the site where the pile rebounded, followed by an acceptable permanent-set, the measured pore pressure ranged between 5 and 20 tsf. The pore pressure exhibited values of less than 5 tsf at the site where no rebound was noticed. In summary, direct correlations between CPTu pore pressure and rebound were produced, allowing identification of soils that produce HPR.

Keywords: CPTu, pore water pressure, pile rebound.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099136

References:

[1] Bingjian, Zhu. 2011. Study of the pore water pressure variation rule in saturated soft soil caused by prestressed concrete pile penetration. Electric Technology and Civil Engineering Conference, 22-24 April 2011, Taizhou, China, pp.756-59.
[2] Chin Fong, Y. 2010. Identifying soils the produce high pile rebound. Technical report, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida.
[3] Cosentino, P. Kalajian, E. Misilo, T, Chin Fong, Y. Davis, K., Jarushi F., Bleakley A., Hussein M. H., and Bates, Z. 2010. Design phase identification of high pile rebound soils. Technical report, Contract BDK81 Work Order 977-01, Florida Department of Transportation.
[4] Eigenbrod, K.D., and T. Issigonis.1996. Pore-water pressures in soft to firm clay during driving of piles into underlying dense sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 33(2):209-218.
[5] FDOT.2010. Standard Specification for Road and Bridges Section 455.
[6] Hölscher, P. 1995. Dynamical response of saturated and dry soils. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
[7] Hussein, M.H., Woerner, W. A., Sharp, M. and Hwang, C. 2006. Pile driveability and bearing capacity in high-rebound soils. American Society of Civil Engineers GEO Congress CD-ROM, Atlanta, GA.
[8] Likins, Garland E. 1983. Pile installation difficulties in soils with large quakes. In G.G. Globe, editors, Proceedings of Symposium 6 at the 1983 ASCE Convention, Philadelphia, May 18, 1983. ASCE Geotechnical Engineering Division.
[9] Murrell, Kyle L., Canivan, Gregory J., Camp, William M. III. 2008. High and low strain testing of bouncing piles. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual and 11th International Conference on Deep Foundations. Article #1603; publication #85.
[10] Robertson, P. K., Woeller, D., and Gillespie, D. 1990. Evaluation of excess pore Pressures and drainage conditions around driven piles using the cone penetration test with poreressure measurements. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27(2):249-254
[11] Jackson, A. Pile Jacking in Sand and Silt. Cambridge University Engineering Department. 2008.