Effect of Cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.) with Maize (Zea mays L.) Intercropping on Yield and Its Components
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Effect of Cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.) with Maize (Zea mays L.) Intercropping on Yield and Its Components

Authors: W. A. Hamd Alla, E. M. Shalaby, R. A. Dawood, A. A. Zohry

Abstract:

A field experiment was carried out at Arab El- Awammer Research Station, Agric. Res. Center. Assiut Governorate during summer seasons of 2013 and 2014. The present study assessed the effect of cowpea with maize intercropping on yield and its components. The experiment comprised of three treatments (sole cowpea, sole maize and cowpea-maize intercrop). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. Results indicated that intercropped maize plants with cowpea, exhibited greater potentiality and resulted in higher values of most of the studied criteria viz., plant height, number of ears/plant, number of rows/ear, number of grains/row, grains weight/ear, 100–grain weight and straw and grain yields. Fresh and dry forage yields of cowpea were lower in intercropping with maize than sole. Furthermore, the combined of the two seasons revealed that the total Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) between cowpea and maize was 1.65. The Aggressivity (A) maize was 0.45 and cowpea was -0.45. This showed that maize was the dominant crop, whereas cowpea was the dominated. The Competitive Ratio (CR) indicated that maize more competitive than cowpea, maize was 1.75 and cowpea was 0.57. The Actual Yield Loss (AYL) maize was 0.05 and cowpea was -0.40. The Monetary Advantage Index (MAI) was 2360.80.

Keywords: Intercropping, cowpea, maize, land equivalent ratio (LER).

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1326836

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 5208

References:


[1] KU. Dhima, AA. Lithourgidis, IB. Vasilakoqlou, and CA. Dordas.Competition indices of common vetch and cereals intercropping in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Res. vol., 100. pp. 249-258. 2007.
[2] M. Dahmardeh, A. Ghanbari, B. Syasar and M. Ramroudi. Effect of intercropping maize with cowpea on green forage yields and quality evaluation. Asian J. Plant Sci. vol., 8. pp. 235-239. 2009.
[3] J. A. N. Asiwe, D. Belane, and F. D. Dakora. Evaluation of cowpea breeding lines for nitrogen fixation at ARC Grain crops institute, Potchefstroom, South Africa. Abstract of the 16th International Congress on Biological Nitrogen Fixation, Montana, USA pp. 14-19. 2009.
[4] D.A. Okpara. Growth and yield of maize and vegetable cowpea as influencedby intercroppingandnitrogenfertilizerin thelowlandhumidtropics. J. Sustainable Agric. and the Environ. Vol., 2. pp.188-194. 2000.
[5] Polthanee Anan and SurachetButchareon. Comparisonofsinglecropping, intercropping andrelay cropping ofcornwithcowpeaunder rainedconditions inanuplandareaof northeasternThailand. J. ISSAAS vol., 6. pp.1-12. 2000.
[6] A. K. Padhi. Effect of vegetable intercropping on productivity, economics and energetics of maize (zea mays). Indian J. Agron. Vol., 46. pp. 204-210. 2001.
[7] L. Li, J. Sun, F. Zhang, X. Li, S. Yang and Z. Rengel. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping I yield advantage and interspecific interaction on nutrients. Field Crop Res., vol., 71. pp. 123-137. 2001.
[8] P. K. Ghosh. Growth, yield competition and economics of groundnut/ cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Res. vol., 88. pp.227-237. 2004.
[9] A.A. Zohry. Effect of preceding winter crops and Intercropping on yield, yield components and associated Weeds in maize. Annals of Agric. Sc., Moshtohor, vol., 43. pp. 139-148. 2005.
[10] S. M. Shata, Safaa, A. Mahmoud and Hanan, S. Siam. Improving calcareous soil productivity by integrated effect of intercropping and fertilizer dorycnium rectum.Res. J. of Agri. and Biolo. Sciences, vol., 3. pp.733-739. 2007.
[11] F. Yilmaz, M. Atak and M. Erayman. Identification of advantages of maize­ legume intercropping over stocy cropping through competition indices in the East Mediterranean Region. Turk. J. Agric. Vol., 32. pp.111-119. 2007.
[12] M.A. Abou-Keriasha, M.A.Abd EI-Hady and F.R. Nawar. Response of some cowpea varieties to intercropping with maize under upper Egypt condition.Egypt. J. App. Sci. vol., 24. pp. 495-514. 2009.
[13] HamdollahEskandari and Ahmad Ghanbari. Intercropping of Maize (Zea mays) and Cowpea (Vignasinensis) as Whole-Crop Forage: Effect of Different Planting Pattern on Total Dry Matter Production and Maize Forage Quality. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj. Vol., 37. pp.152-155. 2009.
[14] M.A. Abou-Keriasha, A. SaharSherif and KH. Wafaa Mohamed. Maize grain yield response to intercropping with three legume fodder crops.Egypt. J. Agric. Res. vol., 88. pp.1259-1276. 2010.
[15] Ahmed Ghanbari, Mehdi Dahmardeh, Barat Ali Siahsar andMahmoud Ramroudi. Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) - cowpea (VignaunguiculataL.) intercropping on light distribution, soil temperature and soil moisture in arid environment.Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. Vol., 8. pp. 102-108. 2010.
[16] M. Rezvani, F. Zaefarian, M. Aghaalikhani, H. RahimianMashhadi and E. Zand. Investigation Corn and Soybean intercropping advantages in competition with redroot pigweed and jimsonweed. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol., 5. pp.327-329. 2011.
[17] J. Sarkodie-Addo and Abdul-Rahaman. Spatial arrangements and time of introducing an intercrop on the productivity of component crops in maize (Zea mays L.) – soybean(Glycine max L. Merrill) intercropping systems. Inter. J.of Sci. and Adva. Tech. vol., 2. pp.103-107. 2012.
[18] Y. A. Refay, A. A. Alderfasi, M. M. Selim and k. Awad. Evaluation of variety, cropping pattern and plant density ongrowth and yield production of grain sorghum-cowpea underlimited water supply condition growth, yield and yield component characters of sorghum. J. of Agric. and Veterinary Science, vol., 2. pp.24-29. 2013.
[19] E. D. N. Dube, T. Madanzi1, A. Kapenzi and E. Masvaya.Root length density in maize/cowpea intercropping under a basin tillage system in a semi-arid area of zimbabwe. American Journal of Plant Sciences. vol., 5. pp. 1499-1507. 2014.
[20] Iderawumiabdulraheemmukhtar. Effect of cowpea on growth and yield parameter in a maize-cowpea intercrop. Journal of Management and Science. Vol., 4. pp. 37-42. 2014.
[21] ET. Sebetha, AT. Modi and LG. Owoeye. Maize-cowpea rotation and intercropping effects on cowpea yield. Ph.D.Thesis, University of KwaZulu- Natal. 2014.
[22] J. M. M. Matusso, J. N. Mugwe and M. Mucheru-Muna.Effects of different maize (Zea mays L.)–Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) intercropping patterns on yields and its economics. Academia Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol., 2. pp.159-166. 2014.
[23] Hamid Reza Mobasser, Mohammad Reza Vazirimehr and KhashayarRigi. Effect of intercropping on resources use, weed management and forage quality. Inter. J. of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, vol., 4. pp.707-713. 2014.
[24] K. S. Gangwar, and S. K. Sharma. Fodder legume intercropping in maize (Zea mays) and its effect on succeeding wheat (Triticumaestivum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol., 64. pp.38-40. 1994.
[25] Y. A. Abayomi. Influence of height of maize variety on the productivity of intercropped maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vignaunguiculata L. Walp). Ghana Jnlarie. Vol., 33. pp. 199-206. 2000.
[26] O.M. Egbe, S. E. Alibo, and I. Nwueze. Evaluation of some extra-early-and early- maturing cowpea varieties for intercropping with maize in southern guinea savannah of Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. http://dx.doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2010.1.5.845.858. 2010.
[27] Thayamini H. S. and I. Brintha. Review on maize based intercropping. J. of Agro. Vol., 9. pp.135-145. 2010.
[28] R.N. Amos, B. A. Jens and M. Symon. On farm evaluation of yield and economic benefits of short term maize legume intercropping systems under conservation Agriculture in Malawi. Field crop research, vol., 132. pp.149-157. 2012.
[29] HamdollahEskandari.Intercropping of maize (zea mays) with cowpea (vignasinensis) and mungbean (vignaradiata): effect of complementarity of intercrop components on resource consumption, dry matter production and legumes forage quality. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., vol., 2. pp. 355-360. 2012.
[30] K. Mangasini, L. M. Mwanahawa, G. M. Arbogast and P. K. Neema.Agronomic factors limiting groundnut production: A case of smallholder farming in Taboraregion. 17th Annual Research Workshop Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, pp. 28-29. 2012.
[31] F. O. Takim. Advantages of maize-cowpea intercropping over sole cropping through competition indices.Journal of Agriculture and Biodiversity Research, vol., 1. pp. 53-59. 2012.
[32] O. M. Kitonyo, G.N. Chemining’wa and J.W. Muthomi. Productivity of farmer-preferred maize varieties intercropped with beans in semi-arid Kenya. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research. Vol., 3. pp.6-16. 2013.
[33] R.W. Willey and S.O. Osiru. Studies on mixture of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant populations. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. Vol., 79. pp. 519-529. 1972.
[34] C. A. Mc-Gillichrist. Analysis and competition experiments.Biometrics, Vol., 21. pp. 975- 985. 1960.
[35] R. W. Willey and M. R. Rao. Competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Exp. Agric.f6. pp.117-125. 1980.
[36] P. Banik. Evaluation of wheat (Triticumaestivum) and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 2:1 row replacement series system. J.Agron. & Crop Sci. vol., 176. pp. 289-294. 1996.
[37] R.W. Willey. Intercropping its importance and research needs. Part I: Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abst. Vol., 32. pp.1-10. 1979.
[38] K. A. Gomez and A.A. Gomez. Statistical procedures for agriculture research 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons. New York, pp. 317-333. 1984.