Urban Citizenship in a Sensor Rich Society
Authors: Mike Dee
Abstract:
Urban public spaces are sutured with a range of surveillance and sensor technologies that claim to enable new forms of ‘data based citizen participation’, but also increase the tendency for ‘function-creep’, whereby vast amounts of data are gathered, stored and analysed in a broad application of urban surveillance. This kind of monitoring and capacity for surveillance connects with attempts by civic authorities to regulate, restrict, rebrand and reframe urban public spaces. A direct consequence of the increasingly security driven, policed, privatised and surveilled nature of public space is the exclusion or ‘unfavourable inclusion’ of those considered flawed and unwelcome in the ‘spectacular’ consumption spaces of many major urban centres. In the name of urban regeneration, programs of securitisation, ‘gentrification’ and ‘creative’ and ‘smart’ city initiatives refashion public space as sites of selective inclusion and exclusion. In this context of monitoring and control procedures, in particular, children and young people’s use of space in parks, neighbourhoods, shopping malls and streets is often viewed as a threat to the social order, requiring various forms of remedial action. This paper suggests that cities, places and spaces and those who seek to use them, can be resilient in working to maintain and extend democratic freedoms and processes enshrined in Marshall’s concept of citizenship, calling sensor and surveillance systems to account. Such accountability could better inform the implementation of public policy around the design, build and governance of public space and also understandings of urban citizenship in the sensor saturated urban environment.
Keywords: Citizenship, Public Space, Surveillance, Young People.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1337757
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2363References:
[1] S. Watson, City Publics-The (dis)enchancements of urban encounters. Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2006, pp.147.
[2] K. Malone, Street life: youth, culture and competing uses of public space. Environment and Urbanization, 14 (2), 2002, 87-92.
[3] L. Hollis, Cities are Good For You. London: Bloomsbury, 2013, pp.412.
[4] C. Cunneen, Conflict, Politics and Crime-Aboriginal Communities and the Police. NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2001, pp.182-189.
[5] C. Norris, and G. Armstrong, The Maximum Surveillance Society: The rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg, 1999, pp.142-171.
[6] I. Loader, Youth, Policing and Democracy. London: Macmillan, 1996.
[7] T.H. Marshall, and T. Bottomore, T.Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto, 1950, pp.5-78.
[8] T.H. Marshall, A British sociological career. International Social Science Journal, 25 (1/2), 1973, 88-100.
[9] J.H. Smith, “Foreword” In Bulmer, M., & Rees, A. (Eds.), Citizenship Today The contemporary relevance of T.H. Marshall. London: UCL Press, 1996, pp.9-11.
[10] M. Stibbe, “Ruhleben-The Story of British Civilian Internees in Germany during the First World War, 1914-1918”. Paper presented at the 2nd European Conference in First World War Studies, Oxford, England, pp.10-12.
[11] A. Halsey, “T.H. Marshall and ethical socialism”. In M. Bulmer, & Rees, A. (Eds.), Citizenship Today: The contemporary relevance of T.H. Marshall. London: UCL Press.
[12] J.D. Ketchum, Ruhleben: a prison camp society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965, pp.126-134.
[13] E. Low,Frameworks of Participation: Conceptions of Citizenship in Twentieth Century Britain. Oxford: St. John's College, 2002.
[14] B. Turner,Citizenship and Capitalism: The Debate Over Reformism. London: Allen & Unwin, 1986, pp.220-250.
[15] R. Dahrendorf, “Citizenship and Social Class”. In Bulmer, M., & Rees, A. (Eds.), Citizenship Today The contemporary relevance of T.H. Marshall. London: UCL Press, 1996, pp.37-49.
[16] G. Delanty,Citizenship in a global age. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000.
[17] K. Faulks,Citizenship. London: Routledge, 2000.
[18] J. Sorensen,The Exclusive European Citizenship. Aldershot: Avebury, 1996.
[19] P. Karvelas, “4000 young people join work for dole”. The Australian 15/10/14.
[20] P. Wilson,“Everyone is watching you”. The Australian,10/11/06, pp. 12.
[21] D. Mitchell, The Right To The City. London: The Guildford Press, 2003.
[22] J. Bessant, “The silent consensus linking citizenship and young people”. Children Australia, 21(4), 1996, pp.29-38.
[23] S. Walby, “Is Citizenship Gendered?”The Journal of the British Sociological Association, 28(2), 1994, pp.379-396.
[24] M. Bulmer, and A. Rees, A. (Eds.). Citizenship Today- The contemporary relevance of T. H. Marshall. London: UCL Press, 1996.
[25] A. Davidson,From Subject to Citizen: Australian Citizenship in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp.47-52.
[26] Electoral Commission, The, Voter engagement and young people. Canberra: Australian Electoral Commission, 2002.
[27] W. Runciman, “Why social inequalities are generated by social rights”. In Bulmer, M., & Rees, A. (Eds.), Citizenship Today The contemporary relevance of T.H. Marshall. London: UCL Press, 1996, pp.49-51.
[28] A. Howard,“We are the Masters Now”. In M. Sissons, & French, P. (Eds.) Age Of Austerity 1945-1951.Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964, pp. 17-23.
[29] J. Bessant,Keynote Address: “Youth Participation, Democratic Practice & Problem Solving”, at the Youth Affairs Network Queensland Choices and Challenges in Shaping Our Future Conference, Mackay, Queensland, Australia,2003.
[30] B. Manning, and R. Ryan, Youth and Citizenship. Canberra: National Youth Affairs Research Scheme, 2004.
[31] C. McNeely, (Ed.), Public Rights, Public Rules-Constituting Citizens in the World Polity and National Policy. New York: Garland Publishing, 1998, pp.5-17.
[32] D. Heater,A Brief History of Citizenship. New York: New York University Press, 2004, pp.115.
[33] H. Williamson, “Youth Work and Citizenship”. In J. C. Bynner, L, & Furlong, A. (Eds.), Youth, Citizenship and Social Change in a European Context. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997.
[34] A. Harris,Young People and Everyday Multiculturalism. London: Routledge, 2013, pp.92-110.
[35] S. Sleight, Young People and the Shaping of Public Space in Melbourne, 1870-1914. Surrey: Ashgate, 2013.
[36] M. Roche, Rethinking Citizenship. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
[37] N. Petersen and W. Sanders, (Eds.), Citizenship And Indigenous Australians Changing Conceptions and Possibilities. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[38] J. Noguera,“Citizens or Workers? Basic Income Versus Welfare-To- Work Policies”. Paper presented at the 10th Congressof the Basic Income European Network, Barcelona, Universal Forum of Cultures, 2004.
[39] A. Sen, Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 2006.
[40] G. Standing,Globalisation: The Eight Crises of Social Protection. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2001.
[41] G. Standing, Beyond the New Paternalism: Basic Security as Equality. London: Verso, 2002.
[42] S.Weil,Oppression& Liberty. London: Routledge, 1998.
[43] Rowntree Foundation, the Joseph,The social value of public spaces. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, 2011.
[44] J. Jacobs, J. (1965). The Life and Death of Great American Cities. New York: Random House, 1965, pp.48-61
[45] Dee, M. (2008). “Young People, Public Space and Citizenship”. Unpublished PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.
[46] M. Leonard, “Teens and territory in contested spaces: Negotiating sectarian interfaces in Northern Ireland”. Children’s Geographies. Vol.4, 3-4, 2006, pp.439-456.
[47] D. Laughlin and L. Johnson, “Defining and exploring public space: perspectives of young people from Regent Park, Toronto”. Children’s Geographies. Vol.9, 2, pp.225-238.
[48] D. Sibley, Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West. London: Routledge, 1995.
[49] K. Lynch, Growing Up in Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
[50] C. Freeman, “Colliding worlds: planning with children and young people for better cities”. In Gleeson, B & Snipe, N. (Eds.), Creating Child Friendly Cities. London: Routledge, 2006.
[51] J. Kulynych, “No playing in the public sphere: Democratic theory and the exclusion of children”. Social Theory and Practice, 27(2), 2001, pp.231-264.
[52] G. Valentine, Public Space and the Culture of Childhood. Aldershot and New York: Ashgate, 2004.
[53] H. Woolley, “Freedom of the city: contemporary issues and policy influences on children and young people’s use of public open space in England”. Children’s Geographies, 4(1), 2006, pp.45-59.
[54] D. Summers, “A modern child’s home appears to be its refuge”. TheFinancial Times, 25/04/1995, pp.9.
[55] D. McNeish, and H. Roberts, Playing it Safe: Today’s Children at Play. Ilford: Barnardos, 1995, pp.3-19.
[56] S. Weller, “Situating (young) teenagers in geographies of children and youth”. Children’s Geographies, 4(1), 2006, pp.97-198.
[57] U.Beck,Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992, pp.27-35.
[58] K. Malone and L. Hasluck, “Geographies of Exclusion”. Family Matters No. 49 Autumn 2008. Australian Institute of Family Studies.
[59] P. Crane and M. Dee, M. “Young people, public space & New Urbanism”. Youth Studies Australia, 20(1), 2001,pp11-18.
[60] R. White, “No-go in the fortress city: Young people, inequality and space”.Urban Policy and Research, 14(1), 1996, pp.37-50.
[61] R. White,No Space of Their Own-Young People and Social Control in Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[62] D. Lyon, “Surveillance Studies: Understanding visibility, mobility and the phenetic fix”. Surveillance and Society, 1(1), 2002, pp.1-7.
[63] D. Lyon, Surveillance Society. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001.
[64] D. Lyon, The Electronic Eye-The Rise of Surveillance Society. Oxford: Polity Press, 1994.
[65] R. Shields,Lifestyle Shopping: The Subject of Consumption. London: Routledge, 1992.
[66] S. Miles, and M. Miles,Consuming Cities. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave, 2004.
[67] B. Glaser,The Grounded Theory Perspective 2: Description’s Remodeling of Grounded Theory Methodology. Mill Valley CA: Sociology Press, 2003.
[68] R. White and J. Wyn,Youth and Society, exploring the social dynamics of youth experience. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2004.
[69] V. Morrow, “Children's rights to public space: environment and curfews”. In B. Franklin (Ed.), The New Handbook of Children's Rights. London: Routledge, 2002, pp.9-17.
[70] D. Nelkin and L.Andrews, “Surveillance creep in the genetic age”. In Lyon, D. (ed.) Surveillance as Social Sorting. London: Routledge, 2003.
[71] K. Walby, “Little England? The rise of open-street Closed Circuit Television surveillance in Canada”. Surveillance and Society, 4(1/2), 2006, pp.29-51.
[72] D. Garland, The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp.72- 89.
[73] G. Clavell, “The Political Economy of Surveillance in the (Wannabe) Global City”. Surveillance and Society,8(4), 2011, pp.523-526.
[74] Z. Bauman and D. Lyon, Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.
[75] J. Gabrys, “Programming environments: environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,Vol 32, 2014, pp.5-9.
[76] M. Davis,“Fortress Los Angeles: The Militarization of Urban Space”. In P. Kasinitz (Ed.), Metropolis Centre and Symbol of our Times. London: Macmillan, 1995.
[77] R. Fopp,“Increasing the Potential for Gaze, Surveillance and Normalisation: the transformation of an Australian policy for people who are homeless”. Surveillance and Society, 1(1), 2002, pp.48-65.
[78] H. Dean, “The translation of needs into rights: Reconceptualising social citizenship as a global phenomenon”. International Journal of Social Welfare. 22, 2013, S32-49.
[79] D. Leslie and J.P. Catungal, “Social Justice and the Creative City: Class, Gender and Racial Inequalities”. Geography Compass 6/3 2012, pp.111- 122.