Relationships between Information Transparency, Corporate Governance and D&O Insurance
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Relationships between Information Transparency, Corporate Governance and D&O Insurance

Authors: Shu-Lin Lin, Ching-Chien Yang

Abstract:

This study examines the influence of information transparency and corporate governance on purchase directors and officers liability (D&O) insurance decisions. The results show that companies with greater information transparency have significant demand for D&O insurance. Greater transparency in voluntary disclosures is significantly and positively associated with demand for insurance, indicating that increasing the degree of information disclosure reduces information asymmetry for insurers, which stimulates their willingness to provide greater protection. Analysis of insured and uninsured subsamples indicates that uninsured companies have superior corporate governance compared to insured companies. Although insured companies tend to have weaker corporate governance structures, they appoint Big 4 firms or industry experts to compensate for the weakness of their corporate governance. Empirical results indicate that purchasing D&O insurance can strengthen external corporate governance and increase companies’ willingness to voluntarily provide more transparent information.

Keywords: Directors and officers liability (D&O) insurance, information transparency, corporate governance, Big 4.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1087542

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1831

References:


[1] Chen, T. J., and S. H. Li. 2010. Directors' and officers' insurance, corporate governance and firm performance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(3), 244-262.
[2] Chen, T. J., and C. H. Pang. 2008. An analysis of determinants of the corporate demand for directors’and officers’ liability insurance. NTU Management Review, 18(2), 171-196.
[3] Core, J. E. 1997. On the corporate demand for director’and officers’insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 64, 63-87.
[4] Curthchley, C. E., and R. S. Hansen. 1989. A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends. Financial Management, 18, 36-46.
[5] Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 2001. “Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital market: A review of the empirical disclosure literature.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 31, 405-440.
[6] Holderness, O. G. 1990. Liability insurers as corporate monitors. International Review of Law and Economics, 10 (2), 115-129.
[7] Lang, M. H., and R. J. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review, 71(4),467-492.
[8] Mayers, D., and C. W. Smith. 1982. On the corporate demand for insurance. Journal of Business, 55, 281-296.
[9] Mayers, D., and C.W. Smith. 1987. Corporate insurance and the underinvestment problem. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 55, 45-54.
[10] Mayers, D., and C. W. Smith. 1990. On the corporate demand for insurance: evidence from the reinsurance market. Journal of Business, 63, 19-40.
[11] O’Sullivan, N. 2002. The demand for directors’ and officers’ insurance by large UK companies. European Management Journal, October, 574-583.