An Efficiency Measurement of E-Government Performance for United Nation Ranking Index
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
An Efficiency Measurement of E-Government Performance for United Nation Ranking Index

Authors: Yassine Jadi, Lin Jie

Abstract:

In order to serve the society in an electronic manner, many developing countries have launched tremendous e-government projects. The strategies of development and implementation e-government system have reached different levels, and to ensure consistency of development, the governments need to evaluate e-government performance. The United nation has design e-government development ranking index (EGDI) that rely on three indexes, Online service index (OSI), Telecommunication Infrastructure index (TII), and human capital index( HCI) which are not reflecting the interaction between a government and their citizens. Based on data envelopment analyses (DEA) technique, we are using E-participating index (EPI) as an output of government effort to evaluate the performance of e-government system. Therefore, the ranking index can be achieved in efficiency manner.

Keywords: E-government, DEA, efficiency measurement, EGDI.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1131697

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1160

References:


[1] UNPAN 2008: Global E-government Survey: From E-government to connected Governance.
[2] Janssen, M., Hjort-Madsen, K.: Analyzing Enterprise Architecture in National Governments: The Cases of Denmark and the Netherlands. In: Sprague, R. (ed.) 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2007), IEEE, Big Island (2007)
[3] Alshawi, S., Alahmary, A., Alalwany, and H.: E-government Evaluation Factors: Citizen’s Perspective. Information Technology for Development e-Government Initiatives in theDeveloping World: Challenges and Opportunities 15(3), 193–208 (2009).
[4] Syamsuddin, I.: Evaluation of e-government initiatives in developing countries: an ITPOSMO approach. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences2(12),439–446 (2011)
[5] Kunstelj, M., Vintar, M.: Evaluating the progress of e-government development: Acritical analysis. Information Polity 9, 131–148 (2004)
[6] Gil-Garcia, J., & Pardo, T. (2005). E-Government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216.
[7] Hsieh, P.H., C.S., Yen, D.C., 2013. Assessing web services of emerging economies in an Eastern country-Taiwan’s e-government. Gov
[8] Jie Wu, Dong Guo. Measuring E-government performance of provincial government website in china with slacks-based efficiency measurement
[9] Shan, S., Wang, L., Wang, J., Hao, Y., & Hua, F. (2011). Research on e-government evaluation model based on the principal component analysis. Information Technology and Management, 12(2), 173–185.
[10] The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) report. Tunis November 2005.
[11] Layne, K, Lee, Jungwoo (2001), Developing Fully Functional E-government: A four-stage model, Government information quarterly 18(2): 122-136.
[12] UNE Centre of efficiency and productivity analysis (CEPA, University of New England.
[13] Sangkyu Rho, Jungnam An (2006), Evaluating the efficiency of a two-stage production process using data envelopment analysis. International transactions in operational research.
[14] Farelle M.J. and Fieldhouse M. (1962) Estimating efficient production functions under increasing returns to scale, J.R. Statis. Soc. Series A 125, 252-267.
[15] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of DMUs, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, p. 429-444.
[16] Dyson, R.G., Allen, R., Camanho, A.S., Podinovski, V.V., Sarrico, C.S., Shale, E.A., 2001.Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 132 (2),245–259.
[17] Chen, Y., Liang, L., 2011. Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: one model approach. European Journal of Operational Research 213 (1), 359–360.
[18] Kaoru Tone (1999) A slack-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shijuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8677, Japan
[19] Kaoru Tone (2001) A slack-based measure of supper-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shijuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8677, Japan.