Flocculation on the Treatment of Olive Oil Mill Wastewater: Pretreatment
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Flocculation on the Treatment of Olive Oil Mill Wastewater: Pretreatment

Authors: G. Hodaifa, J. A. Páez, C. Agabo, E. Ramos, J. C. Gutiérrez, A. Rosal

Abstract:

Currently, continuous two-phase decanter process used for olive oil production is the more internationally widespread. The wastewaters generated from this industry (OMW) are a real environmental problem because of its high organic load. Among proposed treatments for these wastewaters, advanced oxidation technologies (Fenton, ozone, photoFenton, etc.) are the most favourable. The direct application of these processes is somewhat expensive. Therefore, the application of a previous stage based on a flocculation-sedimentation operation is of high importance. In this research five commercial flocculants (three cationic, and two anionic) have been used to achieve the separation of phases (liquid clarifiedsludge). For each flocculant, different concentrations (0-1000 mg/L) have been studied. In these experiments, sludge volume formed and the final water quality were determined. The final removal percentages of total phenols (11.3-25.1%), COD (5.6-20.4%), total carbon (2.3-26.5%), total organic carbon (1.50-23.8%), total nitrogen (1.45-24.8%), and turbidity (27.9-61.4%) were determined. The variation on electric conductivity reduction percentage (1-8%) was also determined. Finally, the best flocculants with highest removal percentages have been determined (QG2001 and Flocudex CS49).

Keywords: Flocculants, flocculation, olive oil mill wastewater, water quality.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1107626

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2502

References:


[1] N. Trgo, N. V. Medvidović, and J. Perić, “Application of mathematical empirical models to dynamic removal of lea don natural zeolite clinoptilolite in a fixed bed column,” Indian J. Chem. Technol. 8, 2011, 123-131.
[2] L. M. Nieto, G. Hodaifa, S. R. Vives, J. A. Casares, and J. Ochando, “Degradation of organic matter in olive-oil mill wastewater through homogeneous Fenton-like reaction,” Chem. Eng. J. 173, 2011, 503-510.
[3] FAOSTAT, “Website of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012,”http://faostat.fao.org/.
[4] S. E. Garrido Hoyos, L.M. Nieto, F.C. Rubio, and A.R. Cormenzana, “Kinetics of aerobic treatment of olive mill wastewater (OMW) with Aspergillus terreus,”Process Biochem. 37(10), 2002, 1169–1176.
[5] A. Rozzi, N. Limoni, S. Menegatti, G. Boari, L. Liberti, and R. Passino, “Influence of Na and Ca alkalinity on UASB treatment of olive mill effluents. Part 1. Preliminary results,”Process Chem. 23, 1988, 86–90.
[6] L. M. Nieto, G. Hodaifa, S.R. Vives, and J.A. Casares, “Industrial plant for olive mill wastewater from two-phase treatment by chemicals oxidation,” J. Environ. Eng. 136(11), 2010, 1309-1313.
[7] L.M. Nieto, S.B. Driss, G. Hodaifa, C. Faur, S.R. Vives, J.A. Gimenez, and J. Ochando-Pulido, “Adsorption of iron on crude olive Stones,”Ind. Crop. Prod. 32, 2010, 467–471.
[8] B. Bianco, I. D. Michelis, and F. Vegliò, “Fenton treatment of complex industrial wastewater: Optimization of process conditions by surface response method,” J. Hazard. Mater. 186, 2011, 1733–1738.
[9] Ersoy, I. Tosun, A. Günay, and S. Dikmen, “Turbidity removal from wastewater of natural stone processing by coagulation/flocculation methods,”Clean37 (3), 2009, 225-232.
[10] L. Yan, H. Tao, and P.R. “Bangal, Synthesis and flocculation behaviour of cationic cellulose prepared in a NaOH/urea aqueous solution,” Clean37 (1), 2009, 39-44.
[11] A.A. Tatsi, A.I. Zouboulis, K.A. Matis, and P. Samara, “Coagulation– flocculation pre-treatment of sanitary landfill leachates,” Chemosphere 53, 2003, 737–744.
[12] H.I. Abdel-Shafy, and S.E. Abdel-Basir, “Chemical treatment of industrial wastewater,” Environ. Manage. Health 2(3), 1991, 19–23.
[13] M. Rossini, J. García, and M. Galluzzo, “Optimization of the Coagulation–Flocculation Treatment: Influence of Rapid Mix Parameters,” Water Res. 33, 1999, 1817– 1826.