The Measurement of Endogenous Higher-Order Formative Composite Variables in PLS-SEM: An Empirical Application from CRM System Development
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
The Measurement of Endogenous Higher-Order Formative Composite Variables in PLS-SEM: An Empirical Application from CRM System Development

Authors: Samppa Suoniemi, Harri Terho, Rami Olkkonen

Abstract:

In recent methodological articles related to structural equation modeling (SEM), the question of how to measure endogenous formative variables has been raised as an urgent, unresolved issue. This research presents an empirical application from the CRM system development context to test a recently developed technique, which makes it possible to measure endogenous formative constructs in structural models. PLS path modeling is used to demonstrate the feasibility of measuring antecedent relationships at the formative indicator level, not the formative construct level. Empirical results show that this technique is a promising approach to measure antecedent relationships of formative constructs in SEM.

Keywords: CRM system development, formative measures, PLS path modeling, research methodology.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1071472

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2206

References:


[1] Bagozzi, Richard P. (2011) Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: Methodological and philosophical foundations. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No: 2, 261-292.
[2] Barclay, D. W – Higgins, C. A – Thompson, R. (1995) The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as illustration. Technology Studies, Vol. 2, No: 2, 285–309.
[3] Barki, Henri – Rivard, Suzanne – Talbot, Jean (2001) An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17:4, 37-69.
[4] Bollen, Kenneth A. (2011) Evaluating effect composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No: 2, 359–372.
[5] Cadogan, J.W, & Lee, N. (2010). Improper use of endogenous formative variables. Accepteed at: Journal of Business Research, 18 October 2010, 1-34.
[6] Cenfetelli, Ronald T. – Bassellier, Geneviève (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No: 4, 689–708.
[7] Chen, Injazz J. – Popovich, Karen (2003) Understanding customer relationship management (CRM). People, process and technology. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 9, No: 5, 672-688.
[8] Chin, Wynne W. (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, March 1998, 7−16.
[9] Coltman, Tim– Devinney, Timothy M. – Midgley, David F. – Venaik, Sunil (2008) Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 61, No: 12, 1250–1262.
[10] Diamantopoulos, Adamantios (2006) The error term in formative measurement models: Interpretation and modeling implications. Journal of Modelling in Management, Vol. 1, No: 1, 7–17.
[11] Diamantopoulos, Adamantios – Riefler, Petra – Roth, Katharina P. (2008) Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 61, No: 12, 1203–1218.
[12] Diamantopoulos, Adamantios – Siguaw, Judy A. (2006) Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No: 4, 263–282.
[13] Diamantopoulos, Adamantios – Winklhofer, Heidi M. (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38, No: 2, 269–277.
[14] Edwards, Jeffrey R. (2001) Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 4, No: 2, 144-192.
[15] Edwards, Jeffrey R. – Bagozzi, Richard P. (2000) On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, Vol. 5, No: 2, 155–174.
[16] Fichman, Robert G. (2004a) Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: Emerging concepts and methods. Journal of the AIS, Vol. 5, No: 8, 314–355.
[17] Fjermestad, Jerry – Romano, Nicholas C. (2003) Electronic customer relationship management. Revisiting the general principles of usability and resistance – an integrative implementation framework. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 9, No: 5, 572-591.
[18] Gemino, Andrew – Reich, Blaize Horner – Sauer, Chris (2008) A temporal model of information technology project performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 24, No: 3, 9-44.
[19] Hair, Joe F. – Ringle, Christian M. – Sarstedt, Marko (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 19, No: 2, 139–151.
[20] Hair Joe F. – Sarstedt, Marko – Ringle, Christian M. – Mena, Jeanette A. (2011) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Accepted in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17 May 2011.
[21] Henseler, Jörg – Ringle, Christian M. – Sinkovics, Rudolf R. (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20, 277–320.
[22] Howell, Roy D. – Breivik, Einar – Wilcox, James B. (2007) Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychological Methods, Vol. 12, No: 2, 205-218.
[23] Jarvis, Cheryl Burke – MacKenzie, Scott B. – Podsakoff, Philip M. (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30, September 2003, 199–218.
[24] Jöreskog, Karl G. (1973) A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In: Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, ed. by A.S. Goldberger & O.D. Duncan, 255-284. Seminar Press: New York.
[25] Karimi, Jahangir – Somers, Toni M. – Bhattacherjee, Anol (2007a) The impact of ERP implementation on business process outcomes: A factor- based study. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 24, No: 1, 101-134.
[26] Karimi, Jahangir – Somers, Toni M. – Bhattacherjee, Anol (2007b) The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol 24, No: 2, 221-260.
[27] Leonard-Barton, Dorothy (1988) Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, Vol. 17, No: 5, 251- 267.
[28] Lohmöller, Jan-Bernd (1989) Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Physica: Heidelberg.
[29] MacKenzie, Scott B. – Podsakoff, Philip M. – Jarvis, Cheryl Burke (2005) The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, No: 4, 710-730.
[30] MacKenzie, Scott B. – Podsakoff, Philip M. – Podsakoff, Nathan P. (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No: 2, 293–334.
[31] Nidumolu, Sarma (1995) The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No: 3, 191- 219.
[32] Pavlou, Paul A. – El Sawy, Omar A. (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, Vol. 17, No: 3, 198–227.
[33] Petter, Stacie – Straub, Detmar – Rai, Arun (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No: 4, 623-656.
[34] Ravichandran, T. – Lertwongsatien, Chalermsak (2005) Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm peformance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21, No: 4, 237-276.
[35] Ross, Jeanne W – Beath, Cynthia Mathis – Goodhue, Dale L. (1996) Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, Fall 1996, 31-42.
[36] Rossiter, John R. (2002) The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 19, No: 4, 305–335.
[37] Wallace, Linda – Keil, Mark – Rai, Arun (2004) How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences, Vol. 35, No: 2, 289- 321.
[38] Wilcox, James B. – Howell, Roy D. – Breivik, Einar (2008) Questions about formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 61, 1219-1228.
[39] Wold, Herman (1982) Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions. In: Systems under indirect observations: Part I, ed. by K.G. Jöreskog & H. Wold, 1-54. North-Holland: Amsterdam.
[40] Zablah, Alex R. – Bellenger, Danny N. – Johnston, Wesley J. (2004b) Customer relationship management implementation gaps. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 24, No: 4, 279-295.