Taxonomy of Structured P2P Overlay Networks Security Attacks
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32794
Taxonomy of Structured P2P Overlay Networks Security Attacks

Authors: Zied Trifa, Maher Khemakhem

Abstract:

The survey and classification of the different security attacks in structured peer-to-peer (P2P) overlay networks can be useful to computer system designers, programmers, administrators, and users. In this paper, we attempt to provide a taxonomy of structured P2P overlay networks security attacks. We have specially focused on the way these attacks can arise at each level of the network. Moreover, we observed that most of the existing systems such as Content Addressable Network (CAN), Chord, Pastry, Tapestry, Kademlia, and Viceroy suffer from threats and vulnerability which lead to disrupt and corrupt their functioning. We hope that our survey constitutes a good help for who-s working on this area of research.

Keywords: P2P, Structured P2P Overlay Networks, DHT, Security, classification

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1070391

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1703

References:


[1] Petroski: To Engineer is Human: The role of failure in successful design. Vintage Books, New York 1992.
[2] S. Androutsellis-Theotokis and D. Spinellis: A survey of peer-to-peer content distribution technologies. ACM Computing Surveys 36(4): 335-371 2004.
[3] E.K. lua, J. Crowcroft, and M. PIAS: A survey and comparaison of Peerto- Peer Overlay Networks Schemes. IEEE Communication Survey and Tutorial, 2005
[4] Emil Sit and Robert Morris: Security Considerations for Peer-to-Peer Distributed Hash Tables. Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems,March 2002
[5] MS. Artigas, PG. L├│pez, and A.F. Skarmeta: A comparative study of hierarchical DHT systems. Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks 325-333 2007
[6] Ratnasamy, S., Francis, P., Handley, M., Karp, R., and Shenker: A scalable content-addressable network. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM San Diego, California, Aug. 2001.
[7] I. Stoica, R. Morris et al., "Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-Peer Lookup Protocol for Internet Applications," IEEE/ACM Trans. Net., vol. 11, no. 1, 2003, pp. 17-32.
[8] A. Rowstron and P. Druschel, "Pastry: Scalable, Distributed Object Location and Routing for Large-scale Peer-to-peer Systems," Proc. Middleware, 2001.
[9] B. Y. Zhao et al., "Tapestry: A Resilient Global-Scale Overlay for Service Deployment," IEEE JSAC, vol. 22, no. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 41-53.
[10] P. Maymounkov and D. Mazieres, "Kademlia: A Peer-to-Peer Information System Based on the XOR Metric," Proc. IPTPS, Cambridge, MA, USA, Feb. 2002, pp. 53-65.
[11] D. Malkhi, M. Naor, and D. Ratajczak, "Viceroy: A Scalable and Dynamic Emulation of the Butterfly," Proc. ACM PODC 2002, Monterey, CA, USA, July 2002, pp. 183-92.
[12] X. Yue, X. Qiu, Y. Ji, and C. Zhang: P2P attack taxonomy and relationship analysis. In ICACT-09: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Advanced Communication Technology, pages 1207-1210. IEEE Press, 2009.
[13] D. S.Wallach: A survey of peer-to-peer security issues. In International Symposium on Software Security, pages 42-57, 2002.
[14] L. Wang: Attacks against peer-to-peer networks and countermeasures. Paper on the course T II0.5290 Seminar on Network Security at TKK, 2006.
[15] Conner W, Nahrstedt K, Gupta I: Preventing DoS attacks in peer-to-peer media streaming systems. In: Proc of the 13th annual conference on multimedia computing and networking (MMCN-06), San Jose
[16] Yang J, Li Y, Huang B, Ming J: Preventing DDoS attacks based on credit model for P2P streaming system. In: ATC -08: Proc of the 5th international conference on autonomic and trusted computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 13-20
[17] M. Engle and J. I. Khan: Vulnerabilities of P2P Systems and a Critical Look at their Solutions Technical Report 2006: http://medianet.kent.edu/technicalreport.htm
[18] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-in-the-middle_attack
[19] E. Cooke, F. Jahanian, and D. McPherson, "The zombie roundup: Understanding, detecting, and disrupting botnets," in Proceedings of SRUTI: Steps to Reducing Unwanted Traffic on the Internet, July 2005.
[20] J. B. Grizzard, V. Sharma, C. Nunnery, B. B. Kang, and D. Dagon: Peer-to-peer botnets: Overview and case study. In USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Understanding Botnets (HotBots-07), 2007.
[21] J.Douceur: The Sybil Attack. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Peer-to-peer Systems. Springer, March 2002.
[22] H. Rowaihy, W. Enck, P. McDaniel, and T. La Porta: Limiting Sybil attacks in structured P2P networks. pages 2596 -2600,May 2007.
[23] P. Druschel and A. I. T. Rowstron. PAST: A large-scale, persistent peerto- peer storage utility. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.
[24] J. Dinger and H. Hartenstein. Defending the Sybil attack in P2P networks: taxonomy, challenges, and a proposal for self-registration. Apr. 2006.
[25] H. Yu, M. Kaminsky, P. B. Gibbons, and A. Flaxman. Sybilguard: defending against sybil attacks via social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM). ACM Press, 2006.
[26] H. Yu, P. B. Gibbons,M. Kaminsky, and F. Xiao. Sybil-Limit: A nearoptimal social network defense against Sybil attacks. Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on, PP(99):1 -14, 2009.
[27] M. Castro, P. Druschel, A. J. Ganesh, A. I. T. Rowstron, and D. S. Wallach. Secure routing for structured peer-to-peer overlay networks. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation (OSDI), Operating Systems Review, pages 299- 314. ACM Press, 2002.
[28] D. Cerri, A. Ghioni, S. Paraboschi, and S. Tiraboschi: ID mapping attacks in P2P networks. In Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005. GLOBECOM -05. IEEE, volume 3, Dec. 2005.
[29] T. Condie, V. Kacholia, S. Sankararaman, J. M. Hellerstein, and P. Maniatis: Induced churn as shelter from routing-table poisoning. In In Proc. 13th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), 2006.
[30] K. Puttaswamy, H. Zheng, and B. Zhao: Securing structured overlays against identity attacks. Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 20(10):1487-1498, Oct. 2009.
[31] D. Stutzbach and R. Rejaie: Understanding churn in peer-to-peer networks. In IMC -06: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pages 189-202. ACM, 2006.
[32] Jian Liang, Naoum Naoumov, and Keith W. Ross: The Index Poisoning Attack in P2P File Sharing Systems. In IEEE Conference on Computer Communication, Barcelona, Spain, April 2006.
[33] Dhungel P, Hei X, Ross KW, Saxena N: The pollution attack in P2P live video streaming: measurement results and defenses. In: Proc of the 2007 workshop on peer-to-peer streaming and IP-TV (P2P-TV-07). ACM, New York, pp 323-328
[34] J. Liang, R. Kumar, Y. Xi and K. Ross, Pollution in P2P File Sharing Systems, In Proc. Of INFOCOM-05, May 2005.
[35] Neil Daswani and Hector Garcia-molina: Query-Flood DoS Attacks in Gnutella. InACM CCS, 2002
[36] N.S. Good, A. Krekelberg: Usability and privacy: a study of KaZaA P2P file-sharing. CHI 2003, April 5-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA in ACM, Volume No. 5, Issue No 1