Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31103
Concept for a Multidisciplinary Design Process–An Application on High Lift Systems

Authors: P. Zamov, H. Spangenberg


Presents a concept for a multidisciplinary process supporting effective task transitions between different technical domains during the architectural design stage. A system configuration challenge is the multifunctional driven increased solution space. As a consequence, more iteration is needed to find a global optimum, i.e. a compromise between involved disciplines without negative impact on development time. Since state of the art standards like ISO 15288 and VDI 2206 do not provide a detailed methodology on multidisciplinary design process, higher uncertainties regarding final specifications arise. This leads to the need of more detailed and standardized concepts or processes which could mitigate risks. The performed work is based on analysis of multidisciplinary interaction, of modeling and simulation techniques. To demonstrate and prove the applicability of the presented concept, it is applied to the design of aircraft high lift systems, in the context of the engineering disciplines kinematics, actuation, monitoring, installation and structure design.

Keywords: Systems Engineering, Multidisciplinary, architectural design, high lift system

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2010


[1] A.Morris, MOB: A European Distributed Multi-Disciplinary Design and Optimization Project, Proceedings of 9th AIAA Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta 2002.
[2] C.Lulla, Functional Flexibility of the A350XWB High Lift System, DGLR Conference, Bremen 2011.
[3] D.P.Raymer,, Enhancing aircraft conceptual design using multidisciplinary optimization, Doctoral Thesis, ISBN 91-7283-259-2, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm 2002.
[4] H.Schumann, P.Zamov, S.Escher, Model-Based Design and Tool Data Exchange in Aerospace: A Case Study, CEAS Aeronautical Journal, Volume 2, Issue 1-4, Springer, 2011.
[5] C.Haskins,Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, Version 3.2, INCOSE, San Diego, 2010.
[6] IEEE, Systems and software engineering - System life cycle processes, ISO/IEC 15288, IEEE Std 15288-2008, Piscataway 2008.
[7] L.Andréani, M.Kirsch, Standard- and Knowledge-Based Kinematic Design in the early Stages of Product Development, ProSTEP iViP Symposium, Berlin 2008.
[8] P.K.C.Rudolph,D.Kinney, C.P.van Dam, S.G.Shaw, J.C.Vander Kam, R.R.Brodeur, Aero-Mechanical Design Methodology for Subsonic Civil Transport High-Lift Systems, RTO AVT Symposium on Aerodynamic Design and Optimisation of Flight Vehicles in a Concurrent Multi- Disciplinary Environment, Ottawa 1999.
[9] S.Friedenthal, A.Moore, R.Steiner, A Practical Guide to SysML - The Systems Modeling Language, ISBN 978-0-12-385206-9, Elsevier Science & Technology, 2012.
[10] P.Homsi, Value Improvement through a Virtual Aeronautical Collaborative Enterprise (VIVACE), Final technical achievements, 2007,
[11] VDI, Design methodology for mechatronic systems, VDI 2206, D├╝sseldorf 2004.
[12] E. Moerland, T. Zill, B. Nagel, H. Spangenberg, H. Schumann, P.Zamov, Application of a Distributed MDAO Framework to the Design of a Short- to Medium-Range Aircraft, DLRK, Berlin 2012, urn:nbn:de:101:1-201211303909.