Factors of Effective Business Software Systems Development and Enhancement Projects Work Effort Estimation
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Factors of Effective Business Software Systems Development and Enhancement Projects Work Effort Estimation

Authors: Beata Czarnacka-Chrobot

Abstract:

Majority of Business Software Systems (BSS) Development and Enhancement Projects (D&EP) fail to meet criteria of their effectiveness, what leads to the considerable financial losses. One of the fundamental reasons for such projects- exceptionally low success rate are improperly derived estimates for their costs and time. In the case of BSS D&EP these attributes are determined by the work effort, meanwhile reliable and objective effort estimation still appears to be a great challenge to the software engineering. Thus this paper is aimed at presenting the most important synthetic conclusions coming from the author-s own studies concerning the main factors of effective BSS D&EP work effort estimation. Thanks to the rational investment decisions made on the basis of reliable and objective criteria it is possible to reduce losses caused not only by abandoned projects but also by large scale of overrunning the time and costs of BSS D&EP execution.

Keywords: Benchmarking data, business software systems development and enhancement projects, effort estimation, software engineering economics, software functional size measurement.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1059487

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1498

References:


[1] Standish Group, "CHAOS manifesto 2011". West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, 2011.
[2] Standish Group, "CHAOS summary 2009". West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, 2009.
[3] David Consulting Group, "Project estimating". Paoli: DCG Corporate Office, 2007: http://www.davidconsultinggroup.com/training/ estimation.aspx (9.11.2011).
[4] M. Dyczkowski, "Evaluation of the course and effects of IT projects. Selected results of comparative studies over the years 2004-2007" (ÔÇ×Ocena przebiegu i efektow przedsiewziec informatycznych. Wybrane wyniki badan porownawczych z lat 2004-2007"), in Organization Support Systems SWO-2007 (Systemy wspomagania organizacji SWO'2007) T. Porebska-Miac, H. Sroka, Eds. Katowice: Research Papers of Katowice University of Economics (Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej w Katowicach), pp. 465-474, 2007.
[5] T. C. Jones, Patterns of software systems failure and success. Boston, MA: International Thompson Computer Press, 1995.
[6] Panorama Consulting Group, "2011 ERP Report". Denver: Panorama Consulting Group, 2011; http://panorama-consulting.com/Documents /2011-ERP-Report.pdf (9.11.2011).
[7] Standish Group, "Modernization - clearing a pathway to success". West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, 2010.
[8] T. C. Jones, "Software project management in the twenty-first century". Burlington: Software Productivity Research, 1999.
[9] State Government of Victoria, "southernSCOPE, reference manual", Version 1. Melbourne, Australia: Government of Victoria, 2000.
[10] J. Johnson, "CHAOS rising", in Proc. of 2nd Polish Conference on Information Systems Quality. Jachranka: Standish Group- Computerworld, 2005.
[11] Standish Group, "CHAOS summary 2008". West Yarmouth, Massachusetts, 2008.
[12] B. Czarnacka-Chrobot, "The economic importance of business software systems development and enhancement projects functional assessment", International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements, vol. 4, no 1&2, pp. 135-146. Wilmington, Delaware, USA: International Academy, Research, and Industry Association, 2011.
[13] B. Czarnacka-Chrobot, "The role of benchmarking data in the software development and enhancement projects effort planning", in New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, H. Fujita, V. Marik, Eds. Proc. of the 8th International Conference SOMET-2009, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 199, pp. 106-127. Amsterdam-Berlin-Tokyo-Washington: IOS Press, 2009.
[14] International Software Benchmarking Standards Group; http://www. isbsg.org/Isbsg.Nsf/weben/Functional%20Sizing%20Methods (9.11. 2011).
[15] International Software Benchmarking Standards Group, The ISBSG: Software project estimates - how accurate are they?. Hawthorn VIC, Australia: ISBSG, January 2005.
[16] R.S. Pressman, Software engineering: a practitioner's approach, 6th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math, 2004.
[17] M. Flasinski, The IT project management (Zarzadzanie projektami informatycznymi). Warsaw: PWN, 2006.
[18] Z. Jiang, B. Jiang, and P. Naudé, "The effects of software size on development effort and software quality", International Journal of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 230-234, 2007.
[19] B. Czarnacka-Chrobot, "Reliability of the BSS development and enhancement projects effort estimation methods" ("Wiarygodnosc metod szacowania pracochlonnosci przedsiewziec rozwoju systemow oprogramowania wspomagajacych zarzadzanie"), in Business Informatics. Informatics in Management (Informatyka Ekonomiczna. Informatyka w zarzadzaniu) J. Sobieska-Karpinska, Ed. Wroclaw: Wroclaw University of Economics Research Papers (Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu), vol. 88, pp. 163-176, 2010.
[20] B. Czarnacka-Chrobot, "The economic importance of business software systems size measurement", in Proceedings of the 5th International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (ICCGI 2010), 20-25 September 2010, Valencia, Spain, M. Garcia, JD. Mathias, Eds. Los Alamitos, California-Washington-Tokyo: IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Services, pp. 293-299, 2010.
[21] B. Czarnacka-Chrobot, "The effectiveness of business software systems functional size measurement", in Proceedings of the 6th International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (ICCGI 2011), 19-24 June 2011, Luxemburg City, Luxemburg, Constantin Paleologu, Constandinos Mavromoustakis, Marius Minea, Eds. Wilmington, Delaware, USA: International Academy, Research, and Industry Association, pp. 63-71, 2011.
[22] M. A. Parthasarathy, Practical software estimation: function point methods for insourced and outsourced projects. Addison Wesley Professional, 2007.
[23] ISO/IEC 14143 Information Technology - Software measurement - Functional size measurement - Part 1-6, ISO, Geneva, 2011.
[24] ISO/IEC 20926 Software and systems engineering - Software measurement - IFPUG functional size measurement method 2009, edition 2, ISO, Geneva, 2009.
[25] ISO/IEC 20968 Software engineering - Mk II Function Point Analysis - Counting practices manual, ISO, Geneva, 2002.
[26] ISO/IEC 24570 Software engineering - NESMA functional size measurement method version 2.1 - Definitions and counting guidelines for the application of Function Point Analysis, ISO, Geneva, 2005.
[27] ISO/IEC 19761 Software engineering - COSMIC: a functional size measurement method, edition 2, ISO, Geneva, 2011.
[28] ISO/IEC 29881 Information Technology - Software and systems engineering - FiSMA 1.1 functional size measurement method, ISO, Geneva 2010.
[29] P. R. Hill, "Some practical uses of the ISBSG history data to improve project management". Hawthorn VIC, Australia: International Software Benchmarking Standards Group, 2007.
[30] US Government Accountability Office, "Cost estimating and assessment guide: best practices for developing and managing capital program costs"; http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d093sp.pdf (9.11.2011).
[31] G. Rule, "The most common Functional Size Measurement (FSM) methods compared". St. Clare-s, Mill Hill, Edenbrige, Kent, UK: Software Measurement Services, 2010.
[32] M. J├©rgensen, "Estimation of software development work effort: evidence on expert judgment and formal models", International Journal of Forecasting 23(3), pp. 449-462, 2007.
[33] NASA, "ISD software project estimation", NASA, Information Systems Division, 580-SP-026-01, June 20, 2005.
[34] M. Kasunic, "The state of software measurement practice: results of 2006 survey", Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, December 2006.
[35] B. Czarnacka-Chrobot, "Analysis of the functional size measurement methods usage by Polish business software systems providers", in Software Process and Product Measurement, A. Abran, R. Braungarten, R. Dumke, J. Cuadrado-Gallego, J. Brunekreef, Eds. Proc. of the 3rd International Conference IWSM/Mensura 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5891, pp. 17-34. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer- Verlag, 2009.
[36] International Software Benchmarking Standards Group, "Data demographics release 11". Hawthorn, Australia: ISBSG, June 2009, pp. 1-24.
[37] International Software Benchmarking Standards Group; http://www.isbsg.org (9.11. 2011).