Nutrients Removal from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent using Eichhornia Crassipes
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Nutrients Removal from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent using Eichhornia Crassipes

Authors: S. R. M. Kutty, S. N. I. Ngatenah, M. H. Isa, A. Malakahmad

Abstract:

Water hyacinth has been used in aquatic systems for wastewater purification in many years worldwide. The role of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) species in polishing nitrate and phosphorus concentration from municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent by phytoremediation method was evaluated. The objective of this project is to determine the removal efficiency of water hyacinth in polishing nitrate and phosphorus, as well as chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonia. Water hyacinth is considered as the most efficient aquatic plant used in removing vast range of pollutants such as organic matters, nutrients and heavy metals. Water hyacinth, also referred as macrophytes, were cultivated in the treatment house in a reactor tank of approximately 90(L) x 40(W) x 25(H) in dimension and built with three compartments. Three water hyacinths were placed in each compartments and water sample in each compartment were collected in every two days. The plant observation was conducted by weight measurement, plant uptake and new young shoot development. Water hyacinth effectively removed approximately 49% of COD, 81% of ammonia, 67% of phosphorus and 92% of nitrate. It also showed significant growth rate at starting from day 6 with 0.33 shoot/day and they kept developing up to 0.38 shoot/day at the end of day 24. From the studies conducted, it was proved that water hyacinth is capable of polishing the effluent of municipal wastewater which contains undesirable amount of nitrate and phosphorus concentration.

Keywords: water hyacinth, phytoremediation, nutrient removal, Eichhornia crassipes

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1056274

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3143

References:


[1] Reddy K. R. (1985). "Nutrient transformations in aquatic macrophyte filters used for water purification". Journal of Proceedings Water Reuse III. American Water Works Association. Page 660 - 678.
[2] Xia H. and Ma X, (2005)."Phytoremediation of Ethion by Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia Crassipes) from Water". Journal of Phytoremediation. Volume 6: Page 137 - 148.
[3] Metcalf and Eddy (2004), Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
[4] Petrucio M.M and Esteves F.A, (2000). "Uptake Rates of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in the Water by Eichhornia Crassipes and Salvinia Auriculata". Journal of Water Hyacinth for improving eutrophic lake water. Volume 60, No.2: Page 229 - 236.
[5] Black A.P and Babers F.H (1939). "Methyl Nitrate". Journal of Org Synthetic. Vol 2: Page 412.
[6] Anderson JJB (1996). "Calcium, Phosphorus and Human Bone Development". Journal of New Scientist. Page 126.
[7] Freddy K.R and De Busk W.F, (1985). "Nutrient removal Potential of Selected Aquatic Macrophytes 4". Journal of Environmental Quality. Page 459 - 462.
[8] Zynda Todd, April (1994). Michigan State University TAB Program, National Institute of Environmental Health, Phytoremediation fact sheet and guideline.
[9] US EPA, 2000: Manual - Phytoremediation Resource Guide. Office of Research and Department. Page 165.
[10] Jayaweera M.W and Kasturiarachchi J.C, (2004). "Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from industrial wastewaters by phytoremediation using water hyacinth (Eichhornia Crassipes)". Journal of Wastewater science and technology. Volume 50, No. 6: Page 217 - 225.
[11] Nesic N. and Jovanovic L. (1996). "Potential Use of Water Hyacinth (E. Crassipens) for Wastewater Treatment in Serbia". Journal of Wastewater treatment using Aquatic plant. No.13: Page 1 - 8.
[12] Reddy K. R. & Tucker J. C. (1983). "Effect of nitrogen source on productivity and nutrient uptake of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)". Journal of Economic Botany. No.37: Page 236 - 246.