Family and Young Learners´ Scholastic Success
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
Family and Young Learners´ Scholastic Success

Authors: Helena Vomackova

Abstract:

This contribution examines the relationship between the family environment and the level of young pupils’ scholastic success. It comments on the partial results of a research probe carried out in the year 2012 on a sample of 412 Czech Republic primary school pupils of the fourth, fifth and sixths forms within the Project IGA 43 201 15 0004 01. The key links of this project were monitored in relation to the highest education level achieved by the learners´ parents, as well as to the type of family it is (in particular its ability to function), to component factors specific to the family climate (their willingness to share information, communication, parental control) and, finally, to the number of children in the family as an important socialization constituent.

Keywords: Family environment factors, scholastic success, parents’ education, family type, family climate.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1088940

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1402

References:


[1] J. Čáp, J. Mareš, Psychologie pro učitele. Praha: Portál, 2001. 655 s. ISBN 80-7178-463-X.
[2] J. Dunovský, Dítě a poruchy rodiny. Praha: Avicenum zdravotnické nakladatelství, 1986. 129 p.
[3] J. Dunovský, Sociální pediatrie. 1st ed. Praha: Grada, 1999, 279 p. ISBN 80-7169-254-9.
[4] Z. Elišková, FunctionalityofIncomplete (Divorced) Family in Relationship to Child. Prevernce úrazů, otrav a násilí 2008, 2nd ed. 139-148 p. ISSN 1804-7858.
[5] I. Goldenberg, H. Goldenberg, Familytherapy: anoverviex. 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole, c2008, xxv. 514 p. ISBN 04-950-9759-4.
[6] Z. Hadj-Moussová, J. Duplinsky, Diagnostika: pedagogicko-psychologické poradenství II. Praha: PdF UK, 2002. 207 p. ISBN 80-729-0101-X.
[7] R. Havlík, J. Koťa, Sociologie výchovy a školy. Praha: Portál, 2002. 91p, ISBN 80-7178-635-7.
[8] Z.Helus, Sociálnípsychologiepropedagogy1st ed.Praha:Grada,2007.280 p..ISBN978-80-247-1168-3.
[9] T. Katrňák, P. Fučík, Preference výběru partnera: Liší se rozvedení a svobodní ve sňatkových a partnerských preferencích? Sociológia, 2009, vol. 41, no. 5. s.437–456. ISSN 0049-1225. Dostupné z: http://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/ 07211237Katrnak%20-%20Fucik%20OK.pdf
[10] R. Kohoutek, Psychologie výchovy a vzdělávání: úvod do pedagogické psychologie. (online). (cit. 2013-01-21). Retrievedfrom: http://www.ped.muni.cz/wpsy/old/stud_materialy/koh_uv_ped_ps.htm
[11] P. Matějů, B. Řeháková, “Úloha mentálních schopností a sociálního původu ve formování vzdělanostních aspirací”. Sociologický časopis, 1992, vol. 28, no. 5. s. 613–635. ISSN 0038-028.
[12] O. Matoušek, Rodina jako instituce a vztahová síť. Praha: Slon, 2nd ed., 2003. ISBN 978-80-86429-19-9.
[13] S. Minuchin. In: Family therapy: an overview. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole, c2008. 244 p.
[14] R. Remedios, D. A. Lieberman, & T. G. Benton. The effects of grades on course enjoyment: Did you get the grade you wanted? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, 70, 353-368.
[15] L. P. Rieber, & D. Noah. Games, simulations, and visual metaphors in education: Antagonism between enjoyment and learning. Educational Media International, 2008, 45(2), 77-92.