The Use of Chlorophyll Meter Readings for the Selection of Maize Inbred Lines under Drought Stress

Authors: F. Gekas, C. Pankou, I. Mylonas, E. Ninou, E. Sinapidou, A. Lithourgidis, F. Papathanasiou, J. –K. Petrevska, F. Papadopoulou, P. Zouliamis, G. Tsaprounis, I. Tokatlidis, C. Dordas

Abstract:

The present study aimed to investigate whether chlorophyll meter readings (SPAD) can be used as criterion of singleplant selection in maize breeding. Experimentation was performed at the ultra-low density of 0.74 plants/m2 in order the potential yield per plant to be fully expressed. R-31 honeycomb experiments were conducted in three different areas in Greece (Thessaloniki, Giannitsa and Florina) using 30 inbred lines at well-watered and water-stressed conditions during the 2012 growing season. The chlorophyll meter readings had higher rates at dry conditions, except location of Giannitsa where differences were not significant. Genotypes of highest chlorophyll meter readings were consistent across areas, emphasizing on the character’s stability. A positive correlation between the chlorophyll meter readings and grain yield was strengthening over time and culminated at the physiological maturity stage. There was a clear sign that the chlorophyll meter readings has the potential to be used for the selection of stress-adaptive genotypes and may permit modern maize to be grown at wider range of environments addressing the climate change scenarios.

Keywords: Drought-prone environments, honeycomb breeding, SPAD, Zea mays.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1087546

References:

[1] G. M. Jeanneau, D. Gerentes, X. Foueillassar, M. Zivy, J. Vidal, A. Toppan, P. Perez, ‘‘Improvement of drought tolerance in maize: towards the functional validation of the Zm-Asr1 gene and increase of water use efficiency by over-expressing C4–PEPC’’ Biochimie 84, 1127–1135, 2002.
[2] L. Nazari,H. H. Pakniyat, ‘‘Assessment of drought tolerance in barley genotypes’’, J Appl Sci 10(2): 151-156, 2010
[3] P. Monneveux, C. Sanchez, A. Tiessen, ‘‘Future progress in drought tolerance in maize needs new secondary traits and cross combinations’’, Journal of Agricultural Science 146, 1–14, 2008.
[4] M. Tollenaar, J. Wu, ‘‘Yield in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance.’’, Crop Science 39, 1604–1897, 1999.
[5] M. Tollenaar, E.-A Lee, ‘‘Yield stability and stress tolerance in maize’’, Fields Crop Research 75, 161–169, 2002.
[6] H. Campos, A. Cooper, J.-E. Habben, G.-O. Edmeades, J.-R. Schussler, ‘‘Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry’’, Field Crops Research 90, 19–34, 2004
[7] M. Tollenaar, E.-A. Lee, “Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis”, Maydica 51, pp.399–408, 2006.
[8] G.-E. Edwards, V.-R. Franceschi, E.-V. Voznesenkaya, ‘‘Single cell C4 photosynthesis versus the dual-cell (Kranz) paradigm’’, Annual Review of Plant Biology 55, 173–196, 2004
[9] C.-R. Boomsma, J.-B. Santini, M. Tollenaar, T.-J. Vyn, ‘‘Maize morphological responses to intense crowding at low nitrogen availability: an analysis and review’’, Agron. J. 101:1426–1452, 2009.
[10] Y. Assefa, K.-L. Roozeboom, S.-A. Staggenborg, J. Du, ‘‘Dryland and irrigated corn yield with climate, management, and hybrid changes from 1939 through 2009’’, Agron J 104:473–482, 2012
[11] R.-J. Van Roekel, J.-A. Coulter, ‘‘Agronomic responses of corn to planting date and plant density’’, Agron J 103:1414–1422, 2011
[12] I.-S. Tokatlidis, M. Koutsika-Sotiriou, A.-C. Fasoulas, ‘‘The development of density independent maize hybrids’’ Maydica 46, 21– 25, 2001.
[13] I.-S. Tokatlidis, C. Tsikrikoni, A.-S. Lithourgidis, J.-T. Tsialtas, C. Tzantarmas, ‘‘Intra-cultivar variation in cotton: response to singleplant yield selection at low density’’, J Agric Sci 149:197–204, 2011
[14] L. Sangoi, M.-A. Gracietti, C. Rampazzo, P. Bianchetti, ‘‘Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant population’’ Field Crops Res. 79, 39–51, 2002.
[15] D.-A. Fasoula, V.-A Fasoula, ‘‘Competitive ability and plant breeding’’, Plant Breed Rev 14:89–138, 1997a.
[16] V.-A. Fasoula, D.-A Fasoula, ‘‘Principles underlying genetic improvement for high and stable crop yield potential’’, Field Crop Res 75:191–209, 2002.
[17] I.S. Tokatlidis, V. Has, I. Mylonas, I. Has, G Evgenidis, V. Melidis, A. Copandean, E. Ninou, ‘‘Density effects on environmental variance and expected response to selection in maize (Zea mays L.)’’, Euphytica 174:283–291, 2010a.
[18] A.-C. Fasoulas , V.-A. Fasoula , ‘‘Honeycomb selection Designs’’, Plant Breed Rev 13:87–139, 1995.
[19] V.-A. Fasoula, ‘‘Selection of high yielding plants belonging to entries of high homeostasis maximizes efficiency in maize breeding’’, XXI International Conference in Maize and Sorgum Breeding in the Genomics Era, Bergamo, Italy, p 28, 21–24 June 2009.
[20] D.-L. Sparks, A.-L. Page, P.-A. Helmke, R.-H. Leoppert, P.-N. Soltanpour, M.-A. Tabatabai, G.-T. Johnston, M.-E. Sumner, ‘‘Methods of soil analysis’’, Soil Science Society of American, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1996.
[21] I. Rajcan, L.-M. Dwyer, M. Tollenaar, ‘‘Note on relationship between leaf soluble carbohydrate and chlorophyll concentrations in maize during leaf senescence’’, Field Crops Res. 63:13–17, 1999.
[22] J.-T. Tsialtas, D. Baxevanos, N. Maslaris, ‘‘SPAD, LAI and their Stability as Assessments of Yield and Quality in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Cultivars Grown in two Contrasting Environments’’, Crop Science, to be published.
[23] W. Yan, M.-S. Kang. ‘‘GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders’’, Geneticists and Agronomists, 1st ed., CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, 2003.
[24] N. Zialdi, M. Brassard, G. Bélanger, A. Claessens, N. Tremblay, A.-N. Cambouris, M.-C. Nolin, L.-É. Parent, ‘‘Chlorophyll Measurements and Nitrogen Nutrition Index for the Evaluation of Corn Nitrogen Status’’, Agron. J. 100:1264–1273, 2008.
[25] N. Ziadi , G. Bélanger, A. Claessens, L. Lefebvre, N. Tremblay, A.-N. Cambouris, M.-C. Nolin, L.-É. Parent, ‘‘Plant-Based Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating Wheat Nitrogen Status’’, Crop Sci. 50(S6):S2580-S2590, 2010.
[26] A.-K. Shukla, J.-K. Ladha,V.-K. Singh, B.-S. Dwivedi, V. Balasubramanian, R.-K. Gupta, S.-K. Sharma, Y. Singh, H. Pathak, P.-S. Pandey, A.-T. Padre, R.-L. Yadav, ‘‘Calibrating the Leaf Color Chart for Nitrogen Management in Different Genotypes of Rice and Wheat in a Systems Perspective’’, Agron. J. 96:1606–1621, 2004.
[27] C. Dordas, A.-S. Lithourgidis, T. Matsi, N. Barbayiannis, ‘‘Application of Liquid Cattle Manure and Inorganic Fertilizers Affect Dry Matter, Nitrogen Accumulation, and Partitioning in Maize’’, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 80 (3), 283-296, 2008.
[28] C. Dordas, C. Sioulas, ‘‘Safflower yield, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency response to nitrogen fertilization under rainfed conditions’’, Industrial Crops and Products. 27: 75-85, 2008.
[29] A.-A. Fleming, J.-H. Palmer, ‘‘Variation in chlorophyll content in maize lines and hybrids’’, Crop Sci. 15:617–620. 1975.
[30] G. Wang, M.-S. Kang, O. Moreno, ‘‘Genetic analyses of grain-filling rate and duration in maize’’, Field Crops Res. 61:211–222, 1999.
[31] E.-A. Lee, M. Tollenaar, ‘‘Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yield’’, Crop Sci. 47(S3):S202–S215, 2007.
[32] Q. Wang, J. Chen, Y. Li. 2004. ‘‘Nondestructive and rapid estimation of leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen status of peace lily using chlorophyll meter’’, J. Plant Nutr. 27:557-569,2004.
[33] F. Wiesler, M. Bauer, M. Kamh, T. Engels, S. Reusch, ‘‘The crop as indicator for sidedress nitrogen demand in sugar beet productionlimitations and perspectives’’, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 165:93-99, 2002.
[34] J. Uddling, J. Gelang-Alfredson, K. Piikki, H. Pleijel, ‘‘ Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings’’, Photosynth. Res. 91:37-46, 2007.