The Western Resource-Oriented Strategic Perspective Meets the Eastern Tai-Chi Thinking

Authors: Tzu-Hsin Liu

Abstract:

This study adopts a qualitative approach, which engages in the dialectical discussion on two levels of dyad opposite views. The first level of the dyad opposite views is the Western strategic perspective and the Eastern Tai-Chi thinking. The second level of the dyad opposite views is resource-based view and resource dependence theory. This study concludes the resource-oriented actions for competitive advantage as the metaphor of Tai-Chi consisted of yin and yang. This study argues that the focal firm should adopt bridging strategy during the core competence development period because its core competence development is likely to meet its competitor’s needs of exploring strategy during the competitor’s external resource development stage. In addition, the focal firm should adopt buffering strategy during the external resource development period to prevent its competitor’s the exploiting strategy from attack during the competitor’s core competence development stage. Consequently, this study takes a significant first step toward a novel contextualize understanding of resource development based on strategic perspective and Tai-Chi thinking providing more fully sustainable strategy for competitive advantage.

Keywords: Competitive advantage, resource-based view, resource dependence theory, strategic perspective, Tai-Chi thinking.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1087514

References:

[1] R. Rumlet, P. D. Schendel, and D. Teece, “Fundamental Issues in Strategy,” in Fundamental Issues in Strategy, Rumlet, R. P., Schendel, D., and Teece, D. Ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994, pp. 9-47.
[2] M. Porter, “Toward a Dynamic Theory of Strategy,” in Fundamental Issues in Strategy, Rumlet, R. P., Schendel, D., and Teece, D. Ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994, pp. 423-461.
[3] D. J. Teece. G. Pisano, and A. “Shuen, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509-533, 1997.
[4] J. B. Barney, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99-120, 1991.
[5] J. Pfeffer, and P. Nowak, “Joint venture and interorganizational interdependence,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 398-418, 1976.
[6] H. E. Aldrich, Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1979.
[7] J. Child, “Organizational structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice,” Sociology, vol. 6, pp. 1-22, 1972.
[8] E. Penrose, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.
[9] R. J. Jiang, Q. T. Tao, and M. D. Santoro, “Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 31, pp. 1136-1144, 2010.
[10] S. A. Alvarez, and L. W. Busenitz, “The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory,” Journal of Management, vol. 27, pp. 755-775. 2001.
[11] C. Oliver, “Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based Views,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 697-713, 1997.
[12] J. Pfeffer, and G. R. Salancik, The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Raw, 1978.