A Critical Social Research Perspective on Self-Directed Learning and Information Technology Practitioners
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
A Critical Social Research Perspective on Self-Directed Learning and Information Technology Practitioners

Authors: Roelien Goede

Abstract:

Information systems practitioners are frequently required to master new technology, often without the aid of formal training. They require the skill to manage their own learning and, when this skill is developed in their formal training, their adaptability to new technology may be improved. Self- directed learning is the ability of the learner to manage his or her own learning experience with some guidance from a facilitator. Self-directed learning skills are best improved when practiced. This paper reflects on a critical social research project to improve the self-directed learning skills of fourth year Information Systems students. Critical social research differs from other research paradigms in that the researcher is viewed as the agent of change to achieve the desired outcome in the problem situation.

Keywords: Action Research, Critical Social Research, Information Systems Education, Self-directed Learning.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1085726

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1767

References:


[1] L. Harvey, Critical social research. London: Unwin Hyman. 1990.
[2] M.D. Myers, Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 21(2):241-242. 1997.
[3] J. Mingers, Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Information systems research, 12 (3): 240-259, 2001.
[4] A.S. Lee, Researching MIS. (In Currie, W.L. & Galliers, R., eds. Rethinking management information systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.7-27.) 1999.
[5] W. Dilthey, The sciences of individuals as elements of socio-historical reality. (In Makkreel, R.A., Frithjof, R. eds. Wilhelm Dilthey: Selected works. Volume 1. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. p.80-87.), 1989.
[6] H.K. Klein & M.D. Myers, A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1):67-94. 1999.
[7] M.S. Knowles, Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Association Press, New York, NY, 1975.
[8] H.B. Long, Learner Managed Learning. Kegan Page, London, 1990.
[9] D.R. Garrison, Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42: 136-148. 1992.
[10] R.G. Brockett & R. Hiemstra, Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge, 1991.
[11] G.O. Grow, Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 125-149, 1991.
[12] L.M. Guglielmino, Development of the Self-DirectedLearning Readiness Scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1977.
[13] K.Wiley, Effects of a self-directed learning project and preference for structure on self-directed learning readiness. Nursing Research, 32 (3): 181-185, 1983.
[14] S. P. O-Kell, A study of the relationships between learning style, readiness for self-directed learning and teaching preference of learner nurses in one healthdistrict. Nurse Education Today, 8: 197-204, 1988.
[15] A. Z. Linares, A comparative study of learning characteristics of RN and generic students. Journal of Nursing Education 28(8): 354-360,1989.
[16] M. Fisher, J. King and G. Tague, Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21, 516-525, 2001.