Comparative Embodied Carbon Analysis of the Prefabrication Elements Compared with In-situ Elements in Residential Building Development of Hong Kong
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Comparative Embodied Carbon Analysis of the Prefabrication Elements Compared with In-situ Elements in Residential Building Development of Hong Kong

Authors: Felix Wong, YT Tang

Abstract:

This paper reviews the greenhouse gas emissions of prefabrication elements for residential development in Hong Kong. Prefabrication becomes a common practice in residential development in Hong Kong and is considered as a green approach. In Hong Kong, prefabrication took place at factories in Pearl River Delta. Although prefabrication reduces construction wastage, it might generate more greenhouse gas emission from transportation and manufacturing processes. This study attempts to measure the “cradle to site" greenhouse gas emission from prefabrication elements for a public housing development in Kai Tak area. The findings could help further reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through process improvement.

Keywords: Prefabrication, greenhouse gas emission, cradle-tosite, residential development.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1080574

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1739

References:


[1] Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2008 Guidelines to DEFRA's GHG Conversion Factors: Methodology Paper for Transport Emission Factors, London, UK, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2008.
[2] Environmental Protection Department and the Electrical and Mechanical Services Department. Guidelines to Account for and Report on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals for Buildings (Commercial, Residential or Institutional Purposes) in Hong Kong. Hong Kong SAR, China, 2010.
[3] Environmental Protection Department, An Overview of Challenges for Waste Reduction and Management in Hong Kong. Hong Kong SAR, China, 2011.
[4] Yu, K. Radon emanation from concrete with pulverized fuel ash (PFA). Building and Environment Volume 29, Issue 4, October 1994, 545-547.
[5] Beer, T., Grant, T., & Campbell, P. K. The greenhouse and air quality emissions of biodiesel blends in Australia. Victoria: CSIRO, 2007.
[6] Environment Bureau, HKSAR Government. Hong Kong's Climate Change Strategy and Action Agenda - Consultation Document. Hong Kong.: Environment Bureau, HKSAR Government, 2011.
[7] Promethium Carbon (Pty) Ltd. (2010). Carbon Footprint Report - Financial and Calendar Year 2009. Gold Fields.
[8] T.Y. Chen, J. B. (2001). Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong. Energy (26), 323-340.
[9] The Hong Kong Green Building Council; BEAM Society. (April 2010). BEAM Plus New Buildings Version 1.1. Hong Kong.
[10] Tinjian University. (2010). Global Warming Potential of China electricity emission. Germany: Global Emission Model for Integrated Systems.
[11] Wong, F., & Amato, A. (Dec 2006). Operational Model For A Combined Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) / Life Cycle Costing (LCC) Study For Office Of Swire Guangzhou Taikoo Hui Project. 2nd Mega- Cities International Conference 2006. Guangzhou, China.