Impact Assessment using Path Models of Microentrepreneurs developed by a Business Corporation in India

Authors: M. J. Xavier, J. Raja, S. Usha Nandhini

Abstract:

For scores of years now, several microfinance organizations, non governmental organizations and other welfare organizations have, with a view to aiding the progress of communities rooted in poverty have been focusing on creating microentrepreneurs, besides taking several other measures. In recent times, business corporations have joined forces to combat poverty by taking up microenterprise development. Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL), the Indian subsidiary of Unilever Limited exemplifies this through its Project Shakti. The company through the Project creates rural women entrepreneurs by making them direct to home sales distributors of its products in villages that have thus far been ignored by multinational corporations. The members participating in Project Shakti are largely self help group members. The paper focuses on assessing the impact made by the company on the members engaged in Project Shakti. The analysis involves use of quantitative methods to study the effect of Project Shakti on those self help group members engaged in Project Shakti and those not engaged with Project Shakti. Path analysis has been used to study the impact made on those members engaged in Project Shakti. Significant differences were observed on fronts of entrepreneurial development, economic empowerment and social empowerment between members associated with Project Shakti and those not associated with Project Shakti. Path analysis demonstrated that involvement in Project Shakti led to entrepreneurial development resulting in economic empowerment that in turn led to social empowerment and that these three elements independently induced a feeling of privilege in the women for being associated with the Project.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship development, economicempowerment, impact assessment, microentrepreneurs, pathanalysis, social empowerment.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1076626

References:

[1] C.K. Prahalad, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits, Wharton School Publishing: Pearson Education Inc., 2005 pp 3-4;12-13.
[2] M. S Banga, Chairman - HLL, Text of speech delivered at the Company-s Annual General Meeting, Mumbai on June 29, 2004, The Economic Times, June 30, 2004.
[3] R Srinivasan, R and M.S. Sriram, "Microfinance in India: Discussion", Management Review,15(2), Reprint 03206b, pp 52-86, June 2003.
[4] H. Cha, P.Cline, L.Lily, C.Meek and M.Cillagomez, "Direct Selling and Economic Empowerment in Brazil: The Case of Avon." Edited by A. Dayal- Gulati, Kellog School of Management, 2003.
[5] The Financial Express, Web edition.. Vol. No. REGD No.DA 1589. May 15, 2006.
[6] The Economic Times, Chennai edition, February 11, 2007.
[7] D. Hulme, "Impact assessment methodologies for microfinance: Theory, experience and better practice", World Development, 28(1), pp 79-98, January 2000.
[8] J. Shaw, "Microenterprise occupation and poverty reduction in microfinance programmes: Evidence from Sri Lanka", World Development 32(7), pp 247-1264, July 2004.
[9] D. Kobb, "Measuring Informal Sector Incomes in Tanzania - Some Constraints to Cost-Benefit Analysis" Small Enterprise Development 8(4), pp 40-48, December 1997.
[10] Sebstad, Jennifer, Catherine Neill, Carolyn Barnes, and Gregory Chen, "Assessing the Impacts of Microenterprise Interventions: A framework for analysis" USAID, Managing for results, Working Paper 7, Washington, DC.: USAID-s center for Development Information and Evaluation, March 1995.
[11] P. Kantor, "Women-s Empowerment Through Home-based Work: Evidence from India", Development and Change. 34(3): pp 425-445. 2003.
[12] Chen, M.A. (1996). Beyond credit. Ottawa, Canada: Aga Khan Foundation.
[13] M.A.Chen, and D. R. Snodgrass, "Managing resources, activities and risk in urban India: the impact of Microfinance", USAID-s Assessing the Impact of Microenterprise Services (AIMS) Paper. Washington, D.C. :Management Systems International, September 2001.
[14] E. Dunn and J.G.Arbuckle, "Microcredit and microenterprise performance:impact evidence from Peru", Small Enterprise Development 12(4), pp22-33, December 2001.
[15] A.Simanowitz, "From event to process: Current trends in microfinance impact assessment", Thematic Report No.5, www.ImpAct.org, December 2001.
[16] M.A. Chen and E. Dunn, "Household Economic Portfolios", USAID-s Assessing the Impact of Microenterprise Services (AIMS) Paper. Washington, D.C. :Management Systems International, June 1996.
[17] P. Kantor, "Determinants of women-s microenterprise success in Ahmedabad, India: Empowerment and economics", Feminist Economics 11(3), pp 63-83, November 2005.
[18] K. V. Rangan and R. Rajan, "Unilever in India: Hindustan Lever-s Project Shakti -Marketing FMCG to the Rural Consumer", Harvard Business Review 9, pp 505-556, June 2006.
[19] Annual General Meeting Speech, 2008, www.hll.com/mediacentre/mediacentrespeeches.asp
[20] N. K. Denzin and Y. S.Lincoln, (Eds). (1998). Strategies of qualitative inquiry , Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
[21] Byrne, BM (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[22] Kline, RB (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd Edition. New York, NY: Guilford Press
[23] Guba, E. G., & Y. Lincoln, Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: N.K.Denzin & Y.S.Lincoln (Eds), The landscape of qualitative research, theories and issues, pp 211, Thousand Oaks, C.A: Sage, 1998
[24] Skoufias, Emmanuel, Sanchez, Susana, Olinto, Pedro, Karlan Dean and CrediAmigo of Banco de Nordeste, Brazil, "An evaluation of the impact of CrediAmigo and the expansion of access to financial services in Brazil" Research Proposal, November 2004.
[25] M. A. Chen and D. Snodgrass, "An Assessment of the Impact of SEWA Bank in India: Baseline Findings", Washington, Management Systems International, August 1999.