Analysis of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Incidents and Accidents: The Role of Human Factors
Authors: Jacob J. Shila, Xiaoyu O. Wu
Abstract:
As the applications of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) continue to increase across the world, it is critical to understand the factors that contribute to incidents and accidents associated with these systems. Given the variety of daily applications that could utilize the operations of the UAV (e.g., medical, security operations, construction activities, landscape activities), the main discussion has been how to safely incorporate the UAV into the national airspace system. The types of UAV incidents being reported range from near sightings by other pilots to actual collisions with aircraft or UAV. These incidents have the potential to impact the rest of aviation operations in a variety of ways including human lives, liability costs, and delay costs. One of the largest causes of these incidents cited is the human factor; other causes cited include maintenance, aircraft, and others. This work investigates the key human factors associated with the UAV incidents. To that end, the data related to UAV incidents that have occurred in the Australia are both reviewed and analyzed to identify key human factors related UAV incidents. The data utilized in this work are gathered from the Australia Transportation Safety Board (ATSB) database. This study adapts the Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to identify key human factors that have contributed to some of the UAV failures to date. The uniqueness of this work is the incorporation of UAV incident data from a variety of applications and not just the military data. In addition, identifying the specific human factors is crucial towards developing safety operational models and human factor guidelines for the UAV. The findings of these common human factors are also compared to similar studies in other countries to determine whether these factors are common internationally.
Keywords: Human factors, incidents and accidents, safety, UAS, UAV.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 27References:
[1] Dan S. UVM and UAVs: A New Way Forward: EBSCOhost. Transm Distrib World 2016.
[2] McGowan S, Kamensky R, Stein M, Black T. And on that farm he had a drone: UAS Deployment in precision agriculture. 2015.
[3] Koh JCO, Hayden M, Daetwyler H, Kant S. Estimation of crop plant density at early mixed growth stages using UAV imagery. Plant Methods 2019 151 2019;15:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13007-019-0449-1.
[4] Tatum MC, Liu J. Unmanned Aircraft System Applications in Construction. Procedia Eng., vol. 196, Elsevier Ltd; 2017, p. 167–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.187.
[5] Tmušić G, Manfreda S, Aasen H, James MR, Gonçalves G, Ben-Dor E, et al. Current practices in UAS-based environmental monitoring. Remote Sens 2020;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061001.
[6] Institute TR, CAICT, Lab TA, platform T open. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Artif. Intell., Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2021, p. 103–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6548-9_10.
[7] Rominger K, Meyer SE. Application of UAV-Based methodology for census of an endangered plant species in a fragile habitat. Remote Sens 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS11060719.
[8] Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Section 333 Authorizations Granted 2016. https://www.faa.gov/uas/advanced_operations/certification/section_44807/authorizations_granted/ (accessed April 9, 2021).
[9] Dillow C. FAA breaks down winners, losers in growing U.S. drone market | Fortune. Fortune 2015.
[10] De Oliveira Costa D, Oliveira NMF, d’Amore R. The feasibility of remotely piloted aircrafts for VOR flight inspection. Sensors (Switzerland) 2020;20. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20071947.
[11] Cornell D, Finnegan P, Rockwell D, Zaloga S. Teal Group Predicts Worldwide Military UAV Production of Almost $99 Billion Over the Next Decade in its 2019/2020 UAV Market Profile and Forecast - Teal Group. 2019.
[12] Birtchnell T, Gibson C. Less talk more drone: social research with UAVs. J Geogr High Educ 2015;39:182–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2014.1003799.
[13] Awange J, Kiema J. Unmanned Aircraft Vehicles. Environ. Geoinformatics, Springer, Cham; 2019, p. 265–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03017-9_20.
[14] Mariani R. RISE OF THE DRONES. Br 2014;43:18–27.
[15] la Cour-Harbo A, Schiøler H. Probability of Low-Altitude Midair Collision Between General Aviation and Unmanned Aircraft. Risk Anal 2019;39:2499–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13368.
[16] Lu B, Coombes M, Li B, Chen W. Aerodrome situational awareness of unmanned aircraft: an integrated self‐learning approach with Bayesian network semantic segmentation. IET Intell Transp Syst 2018;12:868–74. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0101.
[17] Baker W. Drones: Incident Response & Decision-Making. Firehouse 2020. https://www.firehouse.com/operations-training/article/21133196/drones-incident-response-decisionmaking (accessed April 14, 2021).
[18] Boucher P. ‘You Wouldn’t have Your Granny Using Them’: Drawing Boundaries Between “You Wouldn’t have Your Granny Using Them”: Drawing Boundaries Between Acceptable and Unacceptable Applications of Civil Drones. Sci Eng Ethics 2016;22:1391–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11948-015-9720-7.
[19] Pasztor A. Risk of Jetliner-Drone Crash in Focus After Incident. Wall Str J 2018.
[20] Loyd L. DRONE SIGHTINGS: As unmanned aircraft fill the skies, an expert says an accident is inevitable. Philadelphia Inq 2016.
[21] Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Researchers Release Report on Drone Airborne Collisions 2017. https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=89246&omniRss=news_updatesAoc&cid=101_N_U (accessed April 14, 2021).
[22] Alliance for System Safety of UAS through Research Excellence (ASSURE). FAA and Assure Announce Results of Air-To-Air Collision Study – PR. Washington, DC: 2017.
[23] Wall R. U.K. Airport Remains Closed After Drones Disrupt Travel; Incident amplifies concerns about the threat to commercial flights from unmanned aircraft. Wall Str J 2018.
[24] Williams KW. A Summary of Unmanned Aircraft Accident/Incident Data: Human Factors Implications. Oklahoma City: 2004.
[25] Shappell SA, Wiegmann DA. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS. 2000.
[26] Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis n.d.
[27] Robinson SD, Irwin WJ, Kelly TK, Wu XO. Application of machine learning to mapping primary causal factors in self reported safety narratives. Saf Sci 2015;75:118–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2015.02.003.
[28] Huang Y. Support Vector Machines for Text Categorization Based on Latent Semantic Indexing. Electr Comput Eng Dep - Johns Hopkins Univ n.d.
[29] Kakkonen T, Myller N, Sutinen E, Timonen J. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Comparison of Dimension Reduction Methods for Automated Essay Grading. Source J Educ Technol Soc 2008;11:275–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.11.3.275.