Characterising the Performance Benefits of a 1/7th Scale Morphing Rotor Blade

Authors: Mars Burke, Alvin Gatto

Abstract:

Rotary-wing aircrafts serve as indispensable components in the advancement of aviation, valued for their ability to operate in diverse and challenging environments without the need for conventional runways. This versatility makes them ideal for applications such as environmental conservation, precision agriculture, emergency medical support, and rapid-response operations in rugged terrains. However, although highly manoeuvrable, rotary-wing platforms generally have lower aerodynamic efficiency than fixed-wing aircraft. This study aims to improve aerodynamic performance by examining a 1/7th-scale rotor blade model equipped with a NACA0012 airfoil using CROTOR software. The analysis focuses on optimal spanwise locations for separating morphing and fixed blade sections at 85%, 90%, and 95% of the blade radius with up to +20 degrees of twist incorporated into the design. Key performance metrics assessed in this investigation include lift coefficient (CL), drag coefficient (CD), lift-to-drag ratio (CL/CD), Mach number, power, thrust coefficient, and Figure of Merit (FOM). Results indicate that the 0.90 r/R position is optimal for dividing the morphing and fixed sections, achieving a significant improvement of over 7% in both lift-to-drag ratio and FOM. These findings underscore the substantial impact on the overall performance of the rotor system and rotational aerodynamics that geometric modifications through the inclusion of a morphing capability can ultimately realise.

Keywords: Helicopter, rotor blade, rotary morphing, rotational aerodynamics, twist morphing, adaptive structures.

References:

[1] Concilio, A., Dimino, I., Lecce, L., & Pecora, R. (2018). Morphing wing technologies: Large commercial aircraft and civil helicopters. Cambridge, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
[2] Mistry, M., & Gandhi, F. (2014). Helicopter performance improvement with variable rotor radius and RPM. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 59. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.59.042010
[3] Buter, A., Ehlert, C., Sachau, U. D., & Breitbach, E. (2000, May 8–11). Adaptive rotor blade concepts: Direct twist and camber variation. In RTO AVT Symposium on Active Control Technology for Enhanced Performance Operational Capabilities of Military Aircraft, Land Vehicles and Sea Vehicles, Braunschweig, Germany.
[4] Arnold, U. (2003, September 16–18). Recent IBC flight test results from the CH-53G helicopter. In *29th European Rotorcraft Forum*, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
[5] Splettstoesser, W. R., Schultz, K.-J., Kube, R., Brooks, T. F., Booth Jr., E. R., Niesl, G., & Streby, O. (1994). A higher harmonic control test in the DNW to reduce impulsive BVI noise. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 39(4), 3–13.
[6] Brooks, T. F., & Booth Jr., E. R. (1993). The effects of higher harmonic control on blade-vortex interaction noise and vibration. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 38(3), 45–55.
[7] Barbarino, S., Ameduri, S., & Pecora, R. (2007, July 1–4). Wing chamber control architectures based on SMA: Numerical investigations. In Du, S., Leng, J., & Asundi, A. K. (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE International Conference on Smart Materials and Nanotechnology in Engineering (SMN2007) (Vol. 6423, p. 64231E), Harbin, China.
[8] Le Pape, A. (2005). Numerical aerodynamic optimization of helicopter rotors: Multi-objective optimization in hover and forward flight conditions. In Proceedings of the 31st European Rotorcraft Forum, Florence, Italy.
[9] Duri, S. (2013, September 9–12). A leading edge morphing architecture for droop nose effect. In XXII AIDAA National Congress, Napoli, Italy.
[10] Meduri, S. (2014, July 18–19). A SMA-based morphing leading edge architecture. In The 5th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE 2014), Madrid (Best Conference Oral Presentation Award).
[11] Barbarino, S., Pecora, R., Lecce, L., Concilio, A., Ameduri, S., & De Rosa, L. (2011). Airfoil structural morphing based on SMA actuator series: Numerical and experimental studies. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 22(10), 987–1004
[12] Arena, M., Noviello, M. C., Rea, F., Amoroso, F., Pecora, R., & Amendola, G. (2016). Modal stability assessment for a morphing aileron subjected to actuation system failures: Numerical analysis supported by test evidence. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE 2016) (pp. 437–442).
[13] Botez, R. M., Koreanschi, A., Gabor, O. S., Mebarki, Y., Mamou, M., Tondji, Y., Amoroso, F., Pecora, R., Lecce, L., Amendola, G., Dimino, I., & Concilio. (2017). Numerical and experimental testing of a morphing upper surface wing equipped with conventional and morphing ailerons. In 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (January 9–13, 2017, Grapevine, TX). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0445
[14] Cambier, L., Heib, S., & Plot, S. (2013). The ONERA elsA CFD software: Input from research and feedback from industry. Mécanique & Industries, 14, 159–174.
[15] Destarac, D. (2003). Far-field/near-field drag balance and applications of drag extraction in CFD. In VKI Lecture Series CFD Based Aircraft Drag Prediction and Reduction, Hampton, VA.
[16] Dumont, A., & Carrier, G. (2014, July). Multi-point aerodynamic optimization of a flexible transport aircraft wing using an aeroelastic adjoint method. In 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECFD VI), Barcelona, Spain.
[17] Waller, G. (2002, September 8–13). CFD prediction of stability derivatives of a turboprop aircraft using a Cartesian grid-based Euler code. In 23rd International Congress of Aeronautical Science (ICAS 2002), Toronto, Canada.
[18] Boyd Jr., D., & Douglas, D. (2009, September 22–25). Aerodynamic and acoustic study of an active twist rotor using a loosely coupled CFD/CSD method. In Proceedings of the 35th European Rotorcraft Forum (Article 1160), Hamburg, Germany.
[19] Bartley-Cho, J. D., Wang, D. P., Martin, C. A., Kudva, J. N., & West, M. N. (2004). Development of high-rate, adaptive trailing edge control surface for the Smart Wing Phase 2 wind tunnel model. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 15, 279–291.
[20] Guiler, R., & Huebsch, W. (2005, June 6–9). Wind tunnel analysis of a morphing swept tailless aircraft. In Proceedings of the 23rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (AIAA 2005-4981, 14 pp.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
[21] Kim, D. K., Han, J. H., & Kwon, K. J. (2009). Wind tunnel tests for a flapping wing model with a changeable camber using macro-fiber composite actuators. Smart Materials and Structures, 18, 024008.
[22] Neal, D. A., Farmer, J., & Inman, D. J. (2006, May 1–4). Development of a morphing aircraft model for wind tunnel experimentation. In Proceedings of the 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (AIAA 2006-2141), Newport, RI
[23] Ruggeri, R. T., Arbogast, D. J., & Bussom, R. C. (2008, April 7–10). Wind tunnel testing of a lightweight ¼-scale actuator utilizing shape memory alloy. In Proceedings of the 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (AIAA 2008-2279), Schaumburg, IL.
[24] Straub, F., Anand, V. R., Birchette, T., & Lau, B. H. (2009, September 22–25). SMART rotor development and wind tunnel test. In Proceedings of the 35th European Rotorcraft Forum (ERF 2009) (Article 1200, 21 pp.), Hamburg, Germany.
[25] Studebaker, K., & Matuska, D. (1993, May). Variable diameter tiltrotor wind tunnel test results. In Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 49th Annual Forum, St. Louis, MO.
[26] Wang, D. P., Bartley-Cho, J. D., Martin, C. A., & Hallam, B. J. (2001, March 5–8). Development of high-rate, large deflection, hingeless trailing edge control surface for the Smart Wing wind tunnel model. In Proceedings of SPIE Smart Structures and Materials 2001: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies (Vol. 4332, pp. 407–418), Newport Beach, CA.
[27] Popov, A. V., Grigorie, T. L., Botez, R. M., Mamou, M., & Mebarki, Y. (2010, July–August). Closed-loop control validation of a morphing wing using wind tunnel tests. Journal of Aircraft, 47(4), 1309–1317.
[28] Noboru, K., & Saito, S. (2008, April 29–May). Performance evaluation of full-scale on-board active flap system in transonic wind tunnel. In 64th American Helicopter Society Forum, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
[29] Woods, B., Wereley, N., & Kothera, C. (2010, September 28–October 1). Wind tunnel testing of a helicopter rotor trailing edge flap actuated via pneumatic artificial muscles. In ASME 2010 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, Philadelphia, PA.
[30] Berry, B., & Chopra, I. (2011, May 3–5). Wind tunnel testing for performance and vibratory loads of a variable-speed Mach-scale rotor. In 67th American Helicopter Society Forum, Virginia Beach, VA
[31] Barbarino, S., Bilgen, O., Ajaj, R. M., Friswell, M. I., & Inman, D. J. (2011). A review of morphing aircraft. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 22, 823–877.
[32] Straub, F., Anand, V., Birchette, T., & Lau, B. (2009). SMART rotor development and wind tunnel test. In 35th European Rotorcraft Forum, Hamburg, Germany.
[33] Dietrich, O., Enenkl, B., & Roth, D. (2006). Trailing edge flap for active rotor control: Aeroelastic characteristics of the ADASYS rotor system. In 62nd American Helicopter Society Forum, Phoenix, AZ.
[34] Roth, D., Enenkl, B., & Dietrich, O. (2006, September). Active rotor control by flaps for vibration reduction: Full-scale demonstrator and first flight results. In 32nd European Rotorcraft Forum, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
[35] Léon, O., & Gandhi, F. (2009). Rotor power reduction using multiple spanwise-segmented, optimally-actuated trailing-edge flaps. In 35th European Rotorcraft Forum (ERF 2009) (Vol. 1, pp. 431–445).
[36] Léon, O., Hayden, E., & Gandhi, F. (2009). Rotorcraft Operating Envelope Expansion Using Extendable Chord Sections. Presented at the American Helicopter Society 65th Annual Forum, Grapevine, Texas, May 27–29, 2009.
[37] Bao, Jinsong & Nagaraj, V.T. & Chopra, Inderjit & Bernhard, A.P.F.. (2003). Design and Hover Test of Low Vibration Mach Scale Rotor with Twisted Composite Tailored Blade. Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. 5. 10.2514/6.2003-1787.