Top-Down Construction Method in Concrete Structures: Advantages and Disadvantages
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33374
Top-Down Construction Method in Concrete Structures: Advantages and Disadvantages

Authors: Hadi Rouhi Belvirdi

Abstract:

The construction of underground structures using the traditional method begins with excavation and the implementation of the foundation. The process then continues with the construction of the main structure from the ground up. Finally, it concludes with the completion of the final ceiling. This method is known as the Bottom-Up Method. In contrast to this method, there is an advanced technique called the Top-Down Method, which has practically replaced the traditional construction method in large projects in industrialized countries in recent years. Unlike the traditional approach, this method starts with the construction of surrounding walls, columns, and the final ceiling and is completed with the excavation and construction of the foundation of the underground structure. Some of the most significant advantages of this method include the elimination or minimization of formwork surfaces, the removal of temporary bracing during excavation, the creation of some traffic facilities during the construction of the structure, and the possibility of using it in limited and high-traffic urban spaces. Despite these numerous advantages, unfortunately, there is still insufficient awareness of this method in Iran, to the extent that it can be confidently stated that most stakeholders in the construction industry are unaware of the existence of such a construction method. However, it can be utilized as a critical execution option alongside other conventional methods in constructing underground structures. Therefore, due to the extensive practical capabilities of this method, this article aims to present a methodology for constructing underground structures based on the aforementioned advanced method to the scientific community of the country, examine the advantages and limitations of this method and their impacts on time and costs, and discuss its application in urban spaces.

Keywords: Top-Down Method, Bottom-Up Method, underground structure, construction method.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 40

References:


[1] Yu Ou Chang.; "Deep Excavation: Theory & Practice", Taylor & Francis, Leiden, 2006.
[2] Wong, R.W.M.; "The Construction of Deep and Complex Basements and Underground Structures within Extremely Difficult Urban Environment", International Conference on Advances in Building Technology, Hong Kong, December 2002.
[3] Kempfert, H, G., Gebreselassie, B.; "Excavations in Soft Soils", Springer, Heidelberg, 2006.
[4] Puller, Malcolm. Deep Excavations: a practical manual, 2rdEdition, Thomas Telford, 2003.
[5] Qavidel Aghdam Omid, the investigation of the methodology of implementing semi-deep and deep structures in loose soils (Bottom-Up) and (Top-Down) with a special approach to choose the best option for the execution of underground stations of the Ahvaz city train project, Azad University, Faculty of Science, Master's Thesis and Ahvaz research 2016.
[6] Pearlman, S., Walker, M., Boscardin, M.; "Deep Underground Basements for Major Urban Building Construction", ASCE Geo-Support, Drilled Shafts, Micropiling, Deep Mixing, Remedial Methods and Specialty Foundations, Orlando, FL, Jan 2004.
[7] Thasnanipan, N., Maung, A.W., Aye, Z.Z.; "Practical installation of stanchions for top-down construction in Bangkok subsoil", GEOTECH, Developments in Geotechnical Engineering, Bangkok, November 2000.
[8] The institution of structural engineers.; "Design and construction of deep basements including cut and cover structures", IStructE, London, 2004.
[9] Qavidel Aghdam Omid, Instructions for the construction and engineering of the implementation value of AUR100 station - Top-Downs of Ahvaz city train project by the method of Caisson company, city train project KHC-S00-PRC-002-00 Ahvaz, 2006.
[10] Qavidel Aghdam Omid, The implementation methodology of Naderi West Station based on the Top-Down method of Caisson Company, Ahvaz City Train Project 2008