Safeguarding the Construction Industry: Interrogating and Mitigating Emerging Risks from AI in Construction
Abstract:
This empirical study investigates the observed risks associated with adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in the construction industry and proposes potential mitigation strategies. While AI has transformed several industries, the construction industry is slowly adopting advanced technologies like AI, introducing new risks that lack critical analysis in the current literature. A comprehensive literature review identified a research gap, highlighting the lack of critical analysis of risks and the need for a framework to measure and mitigate the risks of AI implementation in the construction industry. Consequently, with two distinct surveys (n = 15 and n = 45), and semi-structured interviews with four industry professionals, this research reveals significant disparities in AI adoption readiness between research and industry sectors. Survey results showed 87% familiarity with AI among research professionals compared to only 18% among industry practitioners, with corresponding adoption rates of 67% and 11% respectively. The study identified key barriers to AI adoption, with lack of awareness, insufficient knowledge and skills, and high implementation costs ranking as the most significant challenges. The most critical risks associated with AI use were identified as data security/privacy, lack of human control, algorithmic bias, and accountability. Additionally, the research revealed that 67% of research-oriented respondents believed Trustworthy AI could help manage risks, while 75% supported Explainable AI as a risk mitigation tool. These findings emphasize the necessity for tailored risk assessment frameworks, guidelines, and governance principles to address the identified risks and promote the responsible adoption of AI technologies in the construction sector.
Keywords: Applications of artificial intelligence in construction, artificial intelligence ethics and bias, artificial intelligence risks in construction, risk management.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 68References:
[1] J. P. Bharadiya, R. K. Thomas, and F. Ahmed, “Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Business and Industry”, J. Eng. Res. Rep., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 85–103, Jun. 2023.
[2] M. Javaid, A. Haleem, R. P. Singh, and R. Suman, “Artificial Intelligence Applications for Industry 4.0: A Literature Based Study,” J. Ind. Intg. Mgmt., vol. 07, no. 01, pp. 83–111, 2022.
[3] A. Bozorgzadeh and T. Umar, “Automated progress measurement using computer vision technology in UK construction,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction, vol. 176, Art. no. 4, 2023.
[4] D. Trujillo and E. Holt, “Barriers to automation and robotics in construction,” presented at the Associated Schools of Construction Proceedings of the 56th Annual International Conference, T. Leathem, Ed., EasyChair, 2020, pp. 257–265.
[5] Lawluvy Yelly Kwesy, Guo Fangyu, and Wang Kaiyang, “A Framework for Assessing Strategies to Combat Individuals? Resistance to Technological Innovation in the Construction Industry,” Construction Research Congress 2022, p. 974982, Mar. 2022.
[6] O. Ballester, “An Artificial Intelligence Definition and Classification Framework for Public Sector Applications,” DG.O2021: the 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 67–75, Jun. 2021.
[7] J. Harika, P. Baleeshwar, K. Navya, and H. Shanmugasundaram, “A Review on Artificial Intelligence with Deep Human Reasoning,” in 2022 International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC), pp. 81–84.
[8] A. S. Bhadoriya, “A Review on Possibilities of Artificial Intelligence in construction Industry,” International journal for research in applied science and engineering technology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 511–513, Mar. 2024.
[9] M. S. Pejić, M. Terzić, D. Stanojević, I. Peško, and V. Mučenski, “Improving Construction Projects and Reducing Risk by Using Artificial Intelligence,” Social Informatics Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–40, Jun. 2023.
[10] L. Alzubaidi et al., “Towards Risk-Free Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: Significance and Requirements,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 2023, pp. 1–41, Oct. 2023.
[11] V. S. Pillai and K. J. M. Matus, “Towards a responsible integration of artificial intelligence technology in the construction sector,” Science and Public Policy, vol. 47, no. 5, Jan. 2021.
[12] R. Rodrigues, “Legal and Human Rights Issues of AI: Gaps, Challenges and Vulnerabilities,” Journal of Responsible Technology, vol. 4, no. 100005, p. 100005, Oct. 2020.
[13] M. Bolpagni and I. Bartoletti, “Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: Adoption, benefits and risks,” in Proceedings of the 38th International Conference of CIB W78, 2021, pp. 326–335.
[14] A. Singh, A. Dwivedi, D. Agrawal, and D. Singh, “Identifying issues in adoption of AI practices in construction supply chains: towards managing sustainability,” Operations Management Research, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1667–1683, 2023.
[15] B. Yahaya, A. A. Ahmed, and B. O. Anikajogun, “Economic Sustainability of Building and Construction Projects Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques,” The Asian Review of Civil Engineering, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 34–40, Jun. 2023.
[16] V. Vijay ananth, A. Aswin bharath, U. Sindhu vaardhini, and P. A. Prabakaran, “Investigating the Enhancement of Construction Supply Chain Management When Incorporated with Artificial Intelligence,” Indian Scientific Journal of Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 07, no. 12, pp. 1–3, Dec. 2023.
[17] C. H. Wong, M. H. Abdul Samad, and N. Taib, “Potential and limitation of AI system in building services and control management system,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 881, no. 1, p. 012044, Nov. 2021.
[18] M. A. Abdelmegid, V. A. González, M. Poshdar, M. O’Sullivan, C. G. Walker, and F. Ying, “Barriers to adopting simulation modelling in construction industry,” Automation in Construction, vol. 111, p. 103046, Mar. 2020.
[19] M. Regona, T. Yigitcanlar, B. Xia, and R. Y. M. Li, “Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 45, Mar. 2022.
[20] S. R. Sahamir, N. A. A. Ismail, R. R. R. M. Rooshdi, and Z. M. Zainordin, “Barriers Impeding the Adoption of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Construction Project Management,” International Journal of Integrated Engineering, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 211–219, Dec. 2021.
[21] A. Khodabakhshian, T. Puolitaival, and L. Kestle. “Deterministic and Probabilistic Risk Management Approaches in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review and Comparative Analysis”. Buildings
[online]. 13 (5), p. 1312, Dec.2023
[22] Y. Hu, W. Kuang, Z. Qin, K., J. Zhang, Y. Gao, W. Li and K. Li. Artificial Intelligence Security: Threats and Countermeasures. ACM Computing Surveys (online). 55 (1), pp. 1–36, 2023.
[23] O. Ore and M. Sposato. “Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Recruitment and Selection”. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 30 (6), pp. 1771–1782, Dec. 2021.
[24] K. Wach, D. Cong, J. Ejdys, K. Rūta, K. Pawel, G. Mazurek, J. Paliszkiewicz and E. Ziemba, E. “The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of Chat GPT”. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. 11 (2), pp. 7–30, 2023.
[25] C.R. Yeh, C.J. Wong, W.V. Chang and C.S Lai. (2020) “Labor Displacement in Artificial Intelligence Era: A Systematic Literature Review”. Taiwan Journal of East Asian Studies. 17 (2), pp. 25–75, 2020.
[26] S.F. Ahmad, H. Han, M. Alam, M., Rehmat, K.R Mohd and M. Irshad. “Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education”. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (online). 10 (1), pp. 1–14, 2023.
[27] S.C. Slota, K.R. Fleischmann, S. Greenberg, N. Verma, B. Cummings, L. Li, and C. Shenefiel. “Many hands make many fingers to point: challenges in creating accountable AI”. AI & SOCIETY. 2021.
[28] N. Kordzadeh, and M. Ghasemaghaei. “Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and Future Research Directions”. European Journal of Information Systems. 31 (3), pp. 1–22, 2021.
[29] R. van den Hoven van Genderen. “Privacy and Data Protection in the Age of Pervasive Technologies in AI and Robotics”. European Data Protection Law Review. 3 (3), pp. 338–352, 2017.
[30] M. Vasic and A. Billard. “Safety Issues in human-robot Interactions”. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2013.
[31] J. Mason. “Innovating Construction Law: Towards the Digital Age”. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 2021.
[32] N. Rane.” Role of Chat GPT and Similar Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Construction Industry “Social Science Research Network. 2023.
[33] European Commission. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI | Shaping Europe’s digital future European Commission. 8 April 2019
[online]. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
[Accessed 5 June 2024].
[34] A. Barredo Arrieta et al., “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI,” Information Fusion, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 82–115, Jun. 2020, Accessed: Jan. 14, 2025
[35] O. Olateju, S.U. Okon, O.O. Olaniyi, A.D. Samuel-Okon, & C.U. "Exploring the Concept of Explainable AI and Developing Information Governance Standards for Enhancing Trust and Transparency in Handling Customer Data." SSRN Electronic Journal. 2024
[36]
[36] D. Doran, S. Schulz, T.R. Besold. What Does Explainable AI Really Mean? A New Conceptualization of Perspectives. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.00794. 2017.
[37] K. Jha and A. Rathi. "Implementing Explainable AI in the Construction Industry." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(2), 04019132. 2020.
[38] L. Floridi and J. Cowls. A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 2019.
[39] B.D. Mittelstadt, C. Russell, S. Wachter, Explaining explanations in AI. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.2019.
[40] E. Brynjolfsson and A. McAfee. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W.W. Norton & Company.2014.
[41] N. Díaz-Rodríguez, J. Del Ser, M. Coeckelbergh, M. López de Prado, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Herrera, “Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation,” Information Fusion, vol. 99, no. 101896, p. 101896, Nov. 2023, Accessed: Jan. 14, 2025.
[42] M. Ferdaus, M. Abdelguerfi, E. Ioup, K. N. Niles, K. Pathak, and S. Sloan, “Towards Trustworthy AI: A Review of Ethical and Robust Large Language Models,” arXiv.org, Jun. 01, 2024.
[43] K. Fiok, F. V. Farahani, W. Karwowski, and T. Ahram, “Explainable artificial intelligence for education and training,” The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 133–144, Jul. 2021.