Protecting the Financial Rights of Non-Member Spouses: Addressing the Exploitation of Retirement Benefits in South African Divorce Law

Authors: R. Prinsloo

Abstract:

In South Africa, married retirement fund members can manipulate the legal framework to prevent their spouses from accessing shared retirement benefits during divorce proceedings. The current legal structure allows retirement fund members to accelerate the accrual of their benefits, often by resigning or purchasing living annuities before the finalization of a divorce. This action effectively places these benefits beyond the reach of their spouses, leading to substantial financial prejudice, particularly for financially weaker spouses, typically women. The research highlights that South African courts, including the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA), have not adequately scrutinized the implications of these actions. Specifically, the SCA has ruled that the capital and proceeds from living annuities are not subject to division during divorce, which undermines the financial rights of non-member spouses. The court's failure to consider the source of the money used to purchase these annuities and its potential inclusion in the joint estate or accrual system is a significant concern. The South African Law Reform Commission has recognized this issue, noting the negative impact on financially weaker spouses. The article critiques the lack of legislative response to this problem despite its significant implications for the equitable distribution of marital assets. The current legal framework, particularly the definition of "pension interest" and the provisions under Section 7(7) and Section 7(8) of the Divorce Act, is inadequate in addressing the complexities surrounding the sharing of retirement benefits in divorce cases. The article argues for a comprehensive review and reform of the law to ensure that retirement benefits are treated as patrimonial assets, subject to division upon the occurrence of any trigger event, such as resignation, retirement, or retrenchment. The need for such reform is urgent to prevent economically disadvantaged spouses from being unjustly deprived of their fair share of retirement benefits. In conclusion, the article advocates for legislative amendments to the Divorce Act, specifically Section 7(7), to clarify that pension interests automatically form part of the joint estate, regardless of whether divorce proceedings are underway. This change would safeguard the financial rights of non-member spouses and ensure a more equitable distribution of retirement benefits during divorce. Failure to address this issue perpetuates economic inequality and leaves financially weaker spouses vulnerable during divorce proceedings.

Keywords: Constitution of South Africa, non-member spouse, retirement benefits, spouse.

References:

[1] Hoffman v Sweeney (2010) ZAWCHC 24.
[2] South African Law Reform Commission. (2017). Discussion Paper on the Reform of the Law of Divorce.
[3] Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). Family Law for the Future - An Inquiry into the Family Law System (Report 135).
[4] Family Court of Australia. (2021). Superannuation and Divorce: A Guide to Splitting Superannuation.
[5] Divorce Act 70 of 1979, Sections 7(7) and 7(8).
[6] Sempapalele v Sempapalele (2001).
[7] Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956.
[8] De Kock v Jacobson (2015) ZASCA 86.
[9] ST v CT (2018) ZASCA 73.
[10] De Vos, P. (2015). "Financial Disparities and Divorce: The Impact of the Law on Women's Rights." Journal of South African Law, 132(4), 672-688.
[11] Mawdsley, R. (2022). “Retirement Benefits and Divorce: A Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Family Law, 30(2), 45-62.
[12] Pannick, C. (2020). “The Impact of Divorce on Women’s Financial Security: A Comparative Study of Australia and South Africa.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 34(1), 78-101.
[13] Woolfson, E. (2016). “The Role of Superannuation in Family Law: Australia’s Approach to Property Settlement.” Australian Family Lawyer, 15(1), 23-35.
[14] Finch, J. (2018). “Gender Inequality in the Division of Property on Divorce: The Role of the Family Law Act 1975.” Australian Journal of Family Law, 32(1), 1-20.
[15] Haffejee, S. (2020). "Gender, Family and Divorce in South Africa: A Socio-Legal Perspective." South African Journal on Human Rights, 36(1), 87-106.
[16] Snyman, C. R. (2021). Family Law in South Africa. 3rd ed. Cape Town: Juta Law.
[17] Skelton, A., & Carnelley, M. (2020). Family Law in South Africa. Oxford University Press.
[18] Meskin, P. M. (2021). Divorce, Pension Benefits and Living Annuities in South Africa: Legal Loopholes and Financial Disparities. Journal of Family Law, 45(2), 203-225.
[19] Hutchinson, D., & Pretorius, C. J. (2017). The Law of Contract in South Africa. Oxford University Press.
[20] Pieterse, M. (2016). "Equity and Equality in the Division of Pension Benefits During Divorce: A Critique of the South African Legal Framework." South African Law Journal, 133(3), 477-495.
[21] Heaton, J. (2021). South African Family Law: Divorce and Maintenance. LexisNexis.
[22] Parkinson, P. (2015). "The Future of Financial Settlements on Divorce." Australian Journal of Family Law, 29(1), 1-17.