A Survey of Dynamic Quality of Service Methods in Software Defined Networking
Authors: Vikram Kalekar
Abstract:
Modern Internet Protocol (IP) networks rely heavily on traditional and contemporary Quality of Service (QoS) management mechanisms to ensure the seamless and efficient transmission of network packets during routine operations. The advent of Software-Defined Networking (SDN) has ushered in a new era of network service delivery, characterized by innovative QoS methodologies. While numerous such techniques remain in the experimental phase, a significant subset has undergone rigorous testing within controlled environments, demonstrating promising potential for widespread industrial deployment. This survey endeavors to comprehensively analyze the diverse approaches to QoS and resource allocation within the SDN paradigm. Furthermore, this study seeks to critically evaluate these methodologies and offer insightful commentary on potential avenues for enhancing QoS management within the context of SDN architectures.
Keywords: Congestion, flow management, latency, Quality of Service, QoS, Software-Defined Networking.
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 131References:
[1] Rares Serban. Dynamic QoS Management in the Internet. Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI). Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, 2003. English. ⟨NNT:⟩. ⟨tel-00408686⟩
[2] C. Akin, M. Ceo, Networks, and Inc, 2021 (Online). Available: https://www.mushroomnetworks.com/blog/dynamic-qos-what-is-it-exactly-and-why-you-should-care
[3] M. Karakus and A. Durresi, “Quality of Service (QoS) in Software Defined Networking (SDN): A survey,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 80, pp. 200–218, 2017.
[4] J. Yan, H. Zhang, Q. Shuai, B. Liu, and X. Guo, “HiQoS: An SDN- based multipath QoS solution,” China Communications, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 123–133, 2015. (Online). Available: 10.1109/cc.2015.7112035
[5] R. Khalili, Z. Despotovic, and A. Hecker, “Flow Setup Latency in SDN Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2631–2639, 2018
[6] N. Badr, A. Taleb-Bendiab and D. Reilly, "Policy-based autonomic control service," Proceedings. Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2004. POLICY 2004., Yorktown Heights, NY, USA, 2004, pp. 99-102, doi: 10.1109/POLICY.2004.1309154.
[7] Aljawad, Ahmed & Shah, Purav & Gemikonaklı, Orhan & Trestian, Ramona. (2018). Policy-based QoS Management Framework for Software-Defined Networks. 1-6. 10.1109/ISNCC.2018.8530994.
[8] Thazin, N., & Nwe, K. M. (2020). Quality of Service (QoS)-Based Network Resource Allocation in Software Defined Networking (SDN). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 49(1), 215–226. Retrieved from https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/10750
[9] Xu, Chenhui, Bing-Liang Chen and Hong-yan Qian. “Quality of Service Guaranteed Resource Management Dynamically in Software Defined Network.” J. Commun. 10 (2015): 843-850.
[10] Sun, Dong, Kaixin Zhao, Yaming Fang, and Jie Cui. 2018. "Dynamic Traffic Scheduling and Congestion Control across Data Centers Based on SDN" Future Internet 10, no. 7: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10070064
[11] Bari, Md. Faizul & Chowdhury, Shihabur & Ahmed, Reaz & Boutaba, Raouf. (2013). PolicyCop: An Autonomic QoS Policy Enforcement Framework for Software Defined Networks. SDN4FNS 2013 - 2013 Workshop on Software Defined Networks for Future Networks and Services. 1-7. 10.1109/SDN4FNS.2013.6702548.
[12] Y. Mtawa, A. Memari, A. Haque, and H. Lutfiyya, “Evaluating QoS in SDN-Based EPC: A Comparative Analysis,” 15th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), pp. 1279–1286, 2019.