Evaluation of Pragmatic Information in an English Textbook: Focus on Requests
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Evaluation of Pragmatic Information in an English Textbook: Focus on Requests

Authors: Israa A. Qari

Abstract:

Learning to request in a foreign language is a key ability within pragmatics language teaching. This paper examines how requests are taught in English Unlimited Book 3 (Cambridge University Press), an EFL textbook series employed by King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia to teach advanced foundation year students English. The focus of analysis is the evaluation of the request linguistic strategies present in the textbook, frequency of the use of these strategies, and the contextual information provided on the use of these linguistic forms. The researcher collected all the linguistic forms which consisted of the request speech act and divided them into levels employing the CCSARP request coding manual. Findings demonstrated that simple and commonly employed request strategies are introduced. Looking closely at the exercises throughout the chapters, it was noticeable that the book exclusively employed the most direct form of requesting (the imperative) when giving learners instructions: e.g. listen, write, ask, answer, read, look, complete, choose, talk, think, etc. The book also made use of some other request strategies such as ‘hedged performatives’ and ‘query preparatory’. However, it was also found that many strategies were not dealt with in the book, specifically strategies with combined functions (e.g. possibility, ability). On a sociopragmatic level, a strong focus was found to exist on standard situations in which relations between the requester and requestee are clear. In general, contextual information was communicated implicitly only. The textbook did not seem to differentiate between formal and informal request contexts (register) which might consequently impel students to overgeneralize. The paper closes with some recommendations for textbook and curriculum designers. Findings are also contrasted with previous results from similar body of research on EFL requests.

Keywords: EFL, Requests, Saudi, speech acts, textbook evaluation.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 385

References:


[1] W. Wen – Chen, L. Chien-Hung and L. Chung-Chieh, “Thinking of the Textbook in the ESL/EFL Classroom”, English Language Teaching, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 91–96, 2011.
[2] A. Alharbi, “A descriptive-evaluative study of a Saudi EFL textbook series”, Cogent Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2015.
[3] A. Aldera, “Teaching EFL in Saudi Arabian Context: Textbooks and Culture”, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 8, no. 2, 2017.
[4] K. Al-Nafisah and R. Al-Shorman, “An Evaluation of EFL Materials Taught at Saudi Universities: Instructors’ Perspectives,” King Saud University Journal, vol. 26, pp. 1-15, 2014.
[5] A. Al Fraidan, “Evaluation of Two ESP Textbooks”, English Language Teaching, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 43-47, 2012.
[6] M. Barashid, “Analyzing the Content of Reading Texts Questions in Flying High for Saudi Arabia”, International Education Studies, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 96-103 , 2020.
[7] D. Boudjemma, “Evaluating Pragmatic Information in Algerian EFL Textbooks: The Case of My Book of English, Year Three”, Forum De L’Enseignant, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 138-156, 2018.
[8] I. Aribi, “Analysis of the speech act of request in EFL materials”, International Journal of Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13-29, 2014.
[9] A. Sulaimani, “Gender Representation in EFL Textbooks in Saudi Arabia: A Fair Deal?”, English Language Teaching, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 44-52, 2017.
[10] T. Tawalbeh, “Instructors’ Perceptions of English for Academic Purposes Textbooks at University Level”, Higher Education Studies, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 153-161, 2018.
[11] S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper, Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, 1989.
[12] I. Qari, “Politeness study of requests and apologies as produced by Saudi Hijazi, EFL learners, and British English university students”, Doctoral thesis, University of Roehampton, London, 2017.
[13] Y. Akutsu, “Request Strategies in ‘Oral communication A’ Textbooks”, The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economic, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 135-149, 2006.
[14] A, Martínez-Flor, “Learners’ awareness and production of exhortative speech acts in an EFL context: The effects of the educational setting”, Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, vol. 3, pp. 107– 141, 2003.