{"title":"The Role of Fluid Catalytic Cracking in Process Optimisation for Petroleum Refineries ","authors":"Chinwendu R. Nnabalu, Gioia Falcone, Imma Bortone","volume":151,"journal":"International Journal of Chemical and Molecular Engineering","pagesStart":370,"pagesEnd":377,"ISSN":"1307-6892","URL":"https:\/\/publications.waset.org\/pdf\/10010592","abstract":"
Petroleum refining is a chemical process in which the raw material (crude oil) is converted to finished commercial products for end users. The fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit is a key asset in refineries, requiring optimised processes in the context of engineering design. Following the first stage of separation of crude oil in a distillation tower, an additional 40 per cent quantity is attainable in the gasoline pool with further conversion of the downgraded product of crude oil (residue from the distillation tower) using a catalyst in the FCC process. Effective removal of sulphur oxides, nitrogen oxides, carbon and heavy metals from FCC gasoline requires greater separation efficiency and involves an enormous environmental significance. The FCC unit is primarily a reactor and regeneration system which employs cyclone systems for separation. Catalyst losses in FCC cyclones lead to high particulate matter emission on the regenerator side and fines carryover into the product on the reactor side. This paper aims at demonstrating the importance of FCC unit design criteria in terms of technical performance and compliance with environmental legislation. A systematic review of state-of-the-art FCC technology was carried out, identifying its key technical challenges and sources of emissions. Case studies of petroleum refineries in Nigeria were assessed against selected global case studies. The review highlights the need for further modelling investigations to help improve FCC design to more effectively meet product specification requirements while complying with stricter environmental legislation.<\/p>\r\n","references":"[1]\tS. A. Kalota, I. I. Rahmim, and H. Expertech Consulting Inc., Irvine and E-MetaVenture, Inc., \u201cSolve the Five Most Common FCC Problems,\u201d in AIChE Spring National Meeting, 2003, no. 1.\r\n[2]\tKuo R., Tan A., and BASF Corp., \u201cTroubleshooting catalyst losses in the FCC unit,\u201d Adv. Catal. Technol., 2017.\r\n[3]\tM. Kraxner, T. Frischmann, T. Kofler, M. Pillei, and American Institute of Chemical Engineers, \u201cAn Empirical Comparison of Two Different Cyclone Designs in the Usage of a Third Stage Separator,\u201d in 8th World Congress on Particle Technology, 2018.\r\n[4]\tH. Dries, M. Patel, N. Van Dijk, and T. N. Shell Global Solutions International BV Amsterdam, \u201cNew Advances in Third-Stage Separators,\u201d in Updates on Process Technology, 2000.\r\n[5]\tClimate and Clean Air Coalition, \u201cCleaning up the Global On-road Diesel fleet - A global strategy to introduce low sulphur fuels and cleaner diesel vehicles,\u201d 2016.\r\n[6]\tS. Haridoss, \u201cA Study on Role of Catalyst used in Catalytic Cracking process in Petroleum Refining,\u201d Int. J. ChemTech Res., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 79\u201386, 2017.\r\n[7]\tA. A. Avidan and R. Shinnar, \u201cDevelopment of Catalytic Cracking Technology. A Lesson in Chemical Reactor Design,\u201d Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 931\u2013942, 1990.\r\n[8]\tC. I. C. Pinheiro et al., \u201cFluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process modeling, simulation, and control,\u201d Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1\u201329, 2012.\r\n[9]\tJ. Laine and D. L. Trimm, \u201cConversion of heavy oils into more desirable feedstocks,\u201d J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., vol. 32, no. 7\u201312, pp. 813\u2013833, 1982.\r\n[10]\tB. Bonser, \u201cRefining Process,\u201d SlidePlayer.com Inc., 2019. (Online). Available: https:\/\/slideplayer.com\/user\/4247183\/. (Accessed: 13-Apr-2019).\r\n[11]\tG. A. Somorjai, \u201cCatalysis and Surface Science,\u201d Reprint., H. Heinemann and G. A. Somorjai, Eds. Routledge, 2017, pp. 16\u201317.\r\n[12]\tM. R. Riazi, S. Eser, S. S. Agrawal, and J. L. P. D\u00edez, \u201cPetroleum Refining and Natural Gas Processing,\u201d in Petroleum Refining and Natural Gas Processing, 2013, pp. 135\u2013136.\r\n[13]\tK. A. Couch and L. M. Wolschlag, \u201cUpgrade FCC performance - Part 1,\u201d Hydrocarb. Process., vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 57\u201365, 2010.\r\n[14]\tH. Dries, Shell Global Solutions International, R. McAuley, and Shell UK Oil Products, \u201cFCC cyclones \u2013 a vital element in profitability,\u201d in NPRA, 2000, pp. 21\u201327.\r\n[15]\tS. Catalano et al., \u201cCyclones \/ Hydrocyclones,\u201d Visual Encyclopedia of Chemical Engineering. The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors, pp. 1\u20136, 2018.\r\n[16]\tT. M. Knowlton, \u201cCyclone Systems in Circulating Fluidized Beds,\u201d in 12th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Technology, 2017, vol. 005, pp. 47\u201364.\r\n[17]\tP. H. S. Amos A. Avidan, Frederick J. Krambeck Mobil Research & Development Corp. Paulsboro, N.J. Hartley Owen and N. J. Mobil Research & Development Corp., Princeton, \u201cFCC Closed-cyclone System Eliminates Post-Riser Cracking,\u201d Oil Gas J., vol. 88, no. 13, 1990.\r\n[18]\tR. J. Glendinning, H. L. McQuiston, and ABB Lummus Global, \u201cDirect-coupled cyclone and feed injection,\u201d Digit. Refin., p. 2, 1996.\r\n[19]\tJ. W. Mcternan and I. Abu-Mahfouz, \u201cA Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Cyclones,\u201d in COMSOL Conference, 2014.\r\n[20]\tG. Sun, J. Chen, and M. Shi, \u201cOptimization and Application of Reverse-flow Cyclones,\u201d China Particuology, vol. 3, pp. 43\u201346, 2005.\r\n[21]\tJ. Gimbun, T. G. Chuah, T. S. Y. Choong, and A. Fakhru\u2019l-Razi, \u201cPrediction of the effects of cone tip diameter on the cyclone performance,\u201d J. Aerosol Sci., vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1056\u20131065, 2005.\r\n[22]\tF. Kaya and I. Karagoz, \u201cNumerical investigation of performance characteristics of a cyclone prolonged with a dipleg,\u201d Chem. Eng. J., vol. 151, no. 1\u20133, pp. 39\u201345, 2009.\r\n[23]\tE. Balestrin, R. K. Decker, D. Noriler, J. C. S. C. Bastos, and H. F. Meier, \u201cAn alternative for the collection of small particles in cyclones\u202f: Experimental analysis and CFD modeling,\u201d Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 184, pp. 54\u201365, 2017.\r\n[24]\tK. Elsayed, \u201cDesign of a novel gas cyclone vortex finder using the adjoint method,\u201d Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 142, pp. 274\u2013286, 2015.\r\n[25]\tM. Wasilewski and L. Singh, \u201cOptimization of the geometry of cyclone separators used in clinker burning process\u202f: A case study,\u201d Powder Technol., vol. 313, pp. 293\u2013302, 2017.\r\n[26]\tF. Parvaz, S. H. Hosseini, G. Ahmadi, and K. Elsayed, \u201cImpacts of the vortex finder eccentricity on the flow pattern and performance of a gas cyclone,\u201d Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 187, pp. 1\u201313, 2017.\r\n[27]\tA. N. Huang et al., \u201cInfluence of a laminarizer at the inlet on the classification performance of a cyclone separator,\u201d Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 174, pp. 408\u2013416, 2017.\r\n[28]\tG. Zhang, G. Chen, and X. Yan, \u201cEvaluation and improvement of particle collection efficiency and pressure drop of cyclones by redistribution of dustbins,\u201d Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 139, pp. 52\u201361, 2018.\r\n[29]\tB. Zhao, \u201cDevelopment of a new method for evaluating cyclone efficiency,\u201d Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 447\u2013451, 2005.","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 151, 2019"}