{"title":"Performance Analysis in 5th Generation Massive Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output Systems","authors":"Jihad S. Daba, Jean-Pierre Dubois, Georges El Soury","volume":148,"journal":"International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering","pagesStart":220,"pagesEnd":226,"ISSN":"1307-6892","URL":"https:\/\/publications.waset.org\/pdf\/10010248","abstract":"
Fifth generation wireless networks guarantee significant capacity enhancement to suit more clients and services at higher information rates with better reliability while consuming less power. The deployment of massive multiple-input-multiple-output technology guarantees broadband wireless networks with the use of base station antenna arrays to serve a large number of users on the same frequency and time-slot channels. In this work, we evaluate the performance of massive multiple-input-multiple-output systems (MIMO) systems in 5th<\/sup> generation cellular networks in terms of capacity and bit error rate. Several cases were considered and analyzed to compare the performance of massive MIMO systems while varying the number of antennas at both transmitting and receiving ends. We found that, unlike classical MIMO systems, reducing the number of transmit antennas while increasing the number of antennas at the receiver end provides a better solution to performance enhancement. In addition, enhanced orthogonal frequency division multiplexing and beam division multiple access schemes further improve the performance of massive MIMO systems and make them more reliable.<\/p>\r\n","references":"[1]\tY. Lim, C. Chae, and G. Caire, Performance Analysis of Massive MIMO for Cell-Boundary Users,\u201d IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol. 14, No. 12, pp. 6827-6842, Dec. 2015.\r\n[2]\tJ. Filho, C. Panazio, and T. Abrao, \u201cUplink Performance of Single-Carrier Receiver in Massive MIMO with Pilot Contamination,\u201d IEEE Access, Vol. 5, pp.8669-8681, 2017.\r\n[3]\tH. El Misilmani and A. El-Hajj, \u201cMassive MIMO Design for 5G Networks: An Overview on Alternative Antenna Configurations and Channel Model Challenges,\u201d International Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulations, Genoa, Italy, July 2017.\r\n[4]\tA. Gupta and R. Jha, \u201cA Survey of 5G Networks: Architectural and Emerging Technologies,\u201d IEEE Access, Vol. 3, pp. 1206-1232, 2015.\r\n[5]\tS. Patil, V. Patil, and P. Bhat, \u201cA Review on 5G Technology,\u201d International Journal of Engineering and Innovation Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 26-30, 2012.\r\n[6]\tE. Larsson, O. Edfors, F. Tufvesson, and T. Marzetta, \u201cMassive MIMO for Next Generation Wireless Systems,\u201d IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 186-195, 2014.\r\n[7]\tJ. S. Daba, J. P. Dubois, and Y. Antar, \u201cPeak Data Rate Enhancement Using Switched Micro-Macro Diversity in Cellular Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output Systems,\u201d International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 99-106, 2017.\r\n[8]\tJ. Dubois, R. Minkara, and R. Ayoubi, \u201cGeneralized Maximum Ratio Combining as a Supra-optimal Receiver Diversity Scheme\u201d, Journal of the World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 8, pp. 907-911, 2010.\r\n[9]\tR. Ayoubi, J. Dubois, and R. Minkara, \u201cFPGA Implementation of Generalized Maximum Ratio Combining Receiver Diversity\u201d, Journal of the World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 8, pp. 912-916, 2010.\r\n[10]\tR. Minkara and J. Dubois, \u201cImproved Root-Mean-Square-Gain-Combining for SIMO Channels,\u201d International Journal of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 179-182, 2009.\r\n[11]\t J. Daba, J. P. Dubois, and P. Jreije, \u201cA Novel Receiver Diversity Combining Technique for Internet-Based 4G Wireless Communication\u201d, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Signal Processing, Robotics and Automation (ISPRA'10), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 127-132, February, 2010. \r\n[12]\tJ. Dubois and O. Abdul-Latif, \u201cNovel Diversity Combining in OFDM-Based MIMO Systems,\u201d Proceedings of the American Conference on Applied Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 189-194, 2008. \r\n[13]\tR. Ayoubi, J. Dubois and O. Abdul-latif, \u201cFPGA Implementation of a Novel Receiver Diversity Combining Technique,\u201d Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications, Dubai, pp. 37-40, Nov. 2007. \r\n[14]\tO. Abdul-Latif and J. Dubois, \u201cLS-SVM Detector for RMSGC Diversity in SIMO Channels,\u201d Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Sciences, Signal Processing and Its Applications, Dubai, pp. 1-4, Feb. 2007.\r\n[15]\tO. Abdul-Latif and J. Dubois, \u201cPerformance of UWB System in a Partially Developed Fading Channel with CCI,\u201d Proceedings of the IEEE 5th GCC Communication and Signal Processing Conference, Kuwait, pp. 1-5, March 2009.\r\n[16]\tJ. S. Daba and M. R. Bell, \u201cSynthetic-Aperture-Radar Surface Reflectivity Estimation Using a Marked Point-Process Speckle Model,\u201d Optical Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp.211-227, January 2003. \r\n[17]\tJ. S. Daba and J. P. Dubois, \u201cStatistical Modeling of Mobile Fading Channels Based on Triply Stochastic Filtered Marked Poisson Point Processes,\u201d International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 83-87, 2017. \r\n[18]\tJ. Dubois, \u201cEstimation of the SNR for Wireless Systems in a Local Fading Environment with Multi-Element Antennas,\u201d Proceedings of the 13th EURASIP International Conference on Signal Processing, Turkey, Sept. 2005.\r\n[19]\tJ. Dubois, \u201cEstimation Algorithms for Quantitative Tissue Characterization in Ultrasound Images Using Doubly Stochastic Translated Point Processes,\u201d Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances on Medical Signal and Information Processing (MEDSIP 2004), Valleta, Malta, Sept. 2004.\r\n[20]\tJ. Dubois, \u201cTraffic Estimation in Wireless Networks Using Filtered Doubly Stochastic Point Processes\u201d, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Electronic, and Computer Engineering, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 116-119, September 2004. \r\n[21]\tJ. S. Daba and M. R. Bell, \u201cEstimation of the Surface Reflectivity of SAR Images Based on a Marked Poisson Point Process Model,\u201d Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Signals, Systems, and Electronics, San Francisco, USA, pp. 183-186, October 25, 1995.\r\n[22]\tJ. S. Daba, \u201cStatistical Modeling of Local Area Fading Channels Based on Triply Stochastic Filtered Marked Poisson Point Processes,\u201d International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 7, pp. 726-731, 2015.\r\n[23]\tJ. Daba and P. Jreije, \u201cAdvanced Stochastic Models for Partially Developed Speckle,\u201d International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 183-187, 2009.\r\n[24]\tJ. S. Daba and M. R. Bell, \u201cSegmentation of Speckled Images Using a Likelihood Random Field Model,\u201d Optical Engineering, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 017005-1 to 017005-20, Jan. 2008.\r\n[25]\tJ. Daba, \u201cImproved Segmentation of Speckled Images Using an Arithmetic-to-Geometric Mean Ratio Kernel\u201d, International Journal of Electrical, Robotics, Electronics and Communications Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 10, pp.1454-1457, 2007. \r\n[26]\tJ. Dubois and O. Abdul-Latif, \u201cDetection of Ultrasonic Images in the Presence of a Random Number of Scatterers: A Statistical Learning Approach,\u201d Journal of the World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 542-545, 2007.\r\n[27]\tJ. S. Daba and M. R. Bell, \u201cObject Discrimination and Orientation-Determination in Synthetic Aperture Radar Images,\u201d Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, NASA, Houston, TX, USA, Vol. 2, pp. 877-880, May 23-29, 1992.\r\n[28]\tJ. S. Daba and M. R. Bell, \u201cObject Discrimination and Orientation-Determination in Speckled Images,\u201d Optical Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 1287-1302, April 1994. \r\n[29]\tJ. Dubois and O. Abdul-Latif, \u201cSVM-Based Detection of SAR Images in Partially Developed Speckle Noise,\u201d Journal of the World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 546-550, 2007.\r\n[30]\tA. Abdi, S. Nader-Esfahani, J. S. Daba and M. R. Bell, \u201cComments on Statistics of the Scattering Cross Section of a Small Number of Random Scatterers,\u201d IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 844-845, May 2000. \r\n[31]\tJ. S. Daba and M. R. Bell, \u201cStatistics of the Scattering Cross Section of a Small Number of Random Scatterers,\u201d IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 773-783, August 1995. \r\n[32]\tJ. Daba and P. Jreije, \u201cProbability Distributions for Multiplicative Noise in Internet Associated Wireless Cells and in Speckled Images,\u201d Proceedings of the Conference on Applied Mathematical Problems, Ukrainian Math. Congress, Kiev, Ukraine, pp. 246-253, Aug. 2009. \r\n[33]\tJ. Dubois, \u201cPoisson Modulated Stochastic Model for Partially Developed Multi-Look Speckle,\u201d Proceedings of the American Conference on Applied Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 209-213, 2008. \r\n[34]\tJ. Dubois, \u201cScattering Statistics of Doppler Faded Acoustic Signals Using Speckle Noise Models,\u201d Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Direct and Inverse Problems of Electromagnetic and Acoustic Wave Theory, Lviv, Ukraine, pp. 185-189, Sept. 2003.\r\n[35]\tJ. Dubois, \u201cSegmentation of Speckled Ultrasound Images Based on a Statistical Model,\u201d Proceedings of the 16th EURASIP International Conference (Biosignal\u20192002), Brno, Czech Republic, Vol. 16, pp. 377-380, June 2002.\r\n[36]\tJ. S. Daba and M. R. Bell, \u201cStatistical Distributions of Partially Developed Speckle Based on a Small Number of Constant Scatterers with Random Phase,\u201d Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA, Vol. 4, pp. 2338 - 2341, August 8-12, 1994.","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 148, 2019"}