Green Function and Eshelby Tensor Based on Mindlin’s 2nd Gradient Model: An Explicit Study of Spherical Inclusion Case
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
Green Function and Eshelby Tensor Based on Mindlin’s 2nd Gradient Model: An Explicit Study of Spherical Inclusion Case

Authors: A. Selmi, A. Bisharat

Abstract:

Using Fourier transform and based on the Mindlin's 2nd gradient model that involves two length scale parameters, the Green's function, the Eshelby tensor, and the Eshelby-like tensor for a spherical inclusion are derived. It is proved that the Eshelby tensor consists of two parts; the classical Eshelby tensor and a gradient part including the length scale parameters which enable the interpretation of the size effect. When the strain gradient is not taken into account, the obtained Green's function and Eshelby tensor reduce to its analogue based on the classical elasticity. The Eshelby tensor in and outside the inclusion, the volume average of the gradient part and the Eshelby-like tensor are explicitly obtained. Unlike the classical Eshelby tensor, the results show that the components of the new Eshelby tensor vary with the position and the inclusion dimensions. It is demonstrated that the contribution of the gradient part should not be neglected.

Keywords: Eshelby tensor, Eshelby-like tensor, Green’s function, Mindlin’s 2nd gradient model, Spherical inclusion.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1317390

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 676

References:


[1] M. Kouzeli, A. Mortensen, “Size dependent strengthening in particle reinforced aluminum,” Acta Materialia, vol. 50, 39-51, 2002.
[2] F. Dal Corso, L., Deseri, “Residual stresses in random elastic composites: nonlocal micromechanics-based models and first estimates of the representative volume element size,” Meccanica, vol. 48 (8), 1901-1923, 2013.
[3] H. S. Ma, G. K. Hu, “Eshelby tensors for an ellipsoidal inclusion in a microstretch material,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 44, 3049-3061, 2007.
[4] S. Forest, D. K. Trinh, “Generalized continua and non-homogeneous boundary conditions in homogenisation methods,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 91, 90-109, 2011.
[5] X. Zhang, P. Sharma, “Inclusions and inhomogeneities in strain gradient elasticity with couple stresses and related problems,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 42, 3833-3851, 2005.
[6] R. Maranganti, P. Sharma, “A novel atomistic approach to determine strain gradient elasticity constants: Tabulation and comparison for various metals, semiconductors, silica, polymers and the (Ir) relevance for nanotechnologies,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol 55, 1823-1852, 2007.
[7] M. Bacca, D. Bigoni, F. Dal Corso, D. Veber, “Mindlin second-gradient elastic properties from dilute two-phase Cauchy-elastic composites Part I: Closed form expression for the effective higher-order constitutive tensor,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 50, 4010-4019, 2013.
[8] H. MA, “Solutions of Eshelby-type inclusion problems and a relataed homogeneization method based on a simplified strain gradient elasticity theory,” PhD Thesis, TexasA & MUniversity; 2010.
[9] A. selmi, “Green’s Function and Eshelby’s Tensor Based on Mindlin’s 2nd Gradient Model: An Explicit Study of Cylindrical Inclusion Case,” Journal of Multiscale Modelling, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1756973718500075.