Dynamic traffic loads cause deformation of underground pipes, resulting in vehicle discomfort. This makes it necessary to reinforce the layers of soil above underground pipes. In this study, the subbase layer was reinforced. Finite element software (PLAXIS 3D) was used to in the simulation, which includes geocell reinforcement, vehicle loading, soil layers and Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic (GRP) pipe. Geocell reinforcement was modeled using a geogrid element, which was defined as a slender structure element that has the ability to withstand axial stresses but not to resist bending. Geogrids cannot withstand compression but they can withstand tensile forces. Comparisons have been made between the numerical models and experimental works, and a good agreement was obtained. Using the mathematical model, the performance of three different pipes of diameter 600 mm, 800 mm, and 1000 mm, and three different vehicular speeds of 20 km\/h, 40 km\/h, and 60 km\/h, was examined to determine their impact on surface settlement and vertical pressure at the pipe crown for two cases: with and without geocell reinforcement. The results showed that, for a pipe diameter of 600 mm under geocell reinforcement, surface settlement decreases by 94 % when the speed of the vehicle is 20 km\/h and by 98% when the speed of the vehicle is 60 km\/h. Vertical pressure decreases by 81 % when the diameter of the pipe is 600 mm, while the value decreases to 58 % for a pipe with diameter 1000 mm. The results show that geocell reinforcement causes a significant and positive reduction in surface settlement and vertical stress above the pipe crown, leading to an increase in pipe safety.<\/p>\r\n","references":"[1]\tMoser, Alma P., and Steven L. Folkman. Buried Pipe Design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.\r\n[2]\tRea, Charles, and James K. Mitchell. \"Sand reinforcement using paper grid cells.\" Symposium on Earth Reinforcement. ASCE, 1978.\r\n[3]\tTavakoli Mehrjardi, Gh, S. N. Moghaddas Tafreshi, and Andrew Dawson. \"Numerical analysis on Buried pipes protected by combination of geocell reinforcement and rubber-soil mixture.\" International Journal of Civil Engineering 13.2 (2015): 90-104.\r\n[4]\tFaheem, Hamdy, and Ahmed Mohamed Hassan. \"2D PLAXIS finite element modeling of asphalt-concrete pavement reinforced with geogrid.\" Journal of Engineering Sciences Assiut University Faculty of Engineering 42.6 (2014): 1336-1348.\r\n[5]\tM. Y. Fattah, \"Three-Dimensional Finite Element Simulation of the Buried Pipe Problem in Geogrid Reinforced Soil,\" vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 60-73, 2016.\r\n[6]\tNirmala, R., and R. Rajkumar. \"Finite element analysis of buried UPVC pipe.\" Indian Journal of Science and Technology 9.5 (2016).\r\n[7]\tM. Y. Fattah and W. B. M. Redha, \"Effect of geocell reinforcement in the mitigation of traffic\u201d Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 118-128, 2016.\r\n[8]\tBrinkgreve, Ronald BJ, et al. \"Beyond the Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Analysis.\" (2015). 50.\r\n[9]\tZienkiewicz, O. C., and R. L. Taylor. \"The Finite Element Method. Solid and Fluid Mechanics. Dynamics and Non-Linearity, Vol. II.\" (1991): 227-229.\r\n[10]\tM. Y. Fattah, W. H. Hassan, and S. E. Rasheed, \"Experimental and Numerical Behavior of Flexible Buried Pipes under Geocell Reinforced Subbase Subjected to Repeated Loading,\" 2017.\r\n[11]\tASTM, D. 2008. D2321 Standard practice for the underground installation of thermoplastic pipe for sewers and other gravity-flow applications. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.\r\n[12]\tBSI, B. S. 1980. 5400 Steel, concrete and composite bridges, Part 10: Code of practice for fatigue. British Standards Institution.\r\n[13]\tHaas, Ralph, Jamie Walls, and R. G. Carroll. Geogrid Reinforcement of Granular Bases in Flexible Pavements. No. 1188. 1988.\r\n[14]\tJ. Sellmeijer, \"Design of geotextile reinforced paved roads and parking areas,\" in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, 1990, pp. 177-182.\r\n[15]\tT. Kinney, J. Abbott, and J. Schuler, \"Benefits of using geogrids for base reinforcement with regard to rutting,\" Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 1611, pp. 86-96, 1998.","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 135, 2018"}