{"title":"Wind Fragility for Soundproof Wall with the Variation of Section Shape of Frame","authors":"Seong Do Kim, Woo Young Jung","volume":131,"journal":"International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering","pagesStart":1551,"pagesEnd":1558,"ISSN":"1307-6892","URL":"https:\/\/publications.waset.org\/pdf\/10008178","abstract":"
Recently, damages due to typhoons and strong wind are on the rise. Considering this issue, we evaluated the performance of soundproofing walls based on the strong wind fragility by means of numerical analysis. Among the components of the soundproof wall, aluminum frame was the most vulnerable member, thus we have considered different section of aluminum frame in the determination of wind fragility. Wind load was randomly generated using Monte Carlo Simulation method. Moreover, limit state was based on the test standard of road construction soundproofing wall. In this study, the strong wind fragility was determined by considering the influence factors of wind exposure category, soundproof wall’s installation position, and shape of aluminum frame section. Results of this study could be used to determine the section shape of the frame that has high resistance to the wind during construction of the soundproofing wall.<\/p>\r\n","references":"[1]\tG. Carpenter, \u201cTyphoon Maemi loss report 2003,\u201d Guy Carpenter & Co. Ltd., Asia Pacific Practice, Tower Place, London, EC3R 5BU, 16, 2003.\r\n[2]\tP. J. Vickery, P. F. Skerlj, J. Lin, L. A. Twisdale Jr, M. A. Young, and F. M. Lavelle, \u201cHAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: Damage and loss estimation,\u201d Natural Hazards Review, 2006, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 94-103.\r\n[3]\tJ. K. Choi, and W. Y. Jung, \u201cStrong Wind Weakness Safety Evaluation of Road Sound Insulation Wall Facilities,\u201d Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures, 2017, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59-65.\r\n[4]\tKS F 4770-1 (2015), \u201cSoundproof Panel \u2013 Metallic\u201d Korean Agency for Technology and Standards \u327f, Seoul, Korea (in Korea).\r\n[5]\tSyst\u00e8mes, Dassault, ABAQUS User\u2019s & Theory Manuals\u2014Release 6.13-1, Providence, RI, USA, 2013.\r\n[6]\tAmerican Society of Civil Engineers, \u201cMinimum design loads for buildings and other structures (Vol. 7),\u201d American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.\r\n[7]\tK. H. Lee, and D. V. Rosowsky, \u201cFragility assessment for roof sheathing failure in high wind regions,\u201d Engineering Structures, 2005, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 857\u2013868.\r\n[8]\tB. R. Ellingwood, and P. B. Tekie, \u201cWind load statistics for probability-based structural design,\u201d Journal of Structural Engineering, 1999, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 453\u2013463.\r\n[9]\tK. Porter, \u201cBeginner\u2019s guide to fragility, vulnerability, and risk,\u201d Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, pp. 235\u2013260.","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 131, 2017"}