Comparative Study of Different Enhancement Techniques for Computed Tomography Images
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Comparative Study of Different Enhancement Techniques for Computed Tomography Images

Authors: C. G. Jinimole, A. Harsha

Abstract:

One of the key problems facing in the analysis of Computed Tomography (CT) images is the poor contrast of the images. Image enhancement can be used to improve the visual clarity and quality of the images or to provide a better transformation representation for further processing. Contrast enhancement of images is one of the acceptable methods used for image enhancement in various applications in the medical field. This will be helpful to visualize and extract details of brain infarctions, tumors, and cancers from the CT image. This paper presents a comparison study of five contrast enhancement techniques suitable for the contrast enhancement of CT images. The types of techniques include Power Law Transformation, Logarithmic Transformation, Histogram Equalization, Contrast Stretching, and Laplacian Transformation. All these techniques are compared with each other to find out which enhancement provides better contrast of CT image. For the comparison of the techniques, the parameters Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Mean Square Error (MSE) are used. Logarithmic Transformation provided the clearer and best quality image compared to all other techniques studied and has got the highest value of PSNR. Comparison concludes with better approach for its future research especially for mapping abnormalities from CT images resulting from Brain Injuries.

Keywords: Computed tomography, enhancement techniques, increasing contrast, PSNR and MSE.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132391

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1330

References:


[1] C. L. Yashwanthi Sivakumari, P. Sudharsan, “Comparison of Diverse Enhancement Techniques for Breast Mammograms”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, vol.1, No.7, Dec 2013, pp.400-407.
[2] Mahamoud Al-Ayyoub, Duaa Alawad, Khaldun Al-Darabsah, Inad Aljarrah, “Automatic Detection and Classification of Brain Hemorrhages” WSEAS Transactions on Computers, vol.12, Oct.2013, pp. 395-405.
[3] Ritika, Sandeep Kaur, “Contrast Enhancement Techniques for Images- A Visual Analysis”, International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 64, no.17, Feb 2013.
[4] S. D. Chen, A. R. Ramli, “Minimum Mean Brightness Error-Bi-histogram Equalization in Contrast Enhancement”, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electr. vol.49, No.4, 2003, 1310-1319.
[5] K. Somasundaram, P. Kalavathi, “Medical Image Contrast Enhancement Based on Gamma Correction”, International Journal of Knowledge Management& E-learning, vol.3, No.1, Jan-June 2011, pp.15-18.
[6] Palak Khandelwal, Gangandeep Kaur, “Study of Various Enhancement techniques”, International Journal of Electronics & Communication Technology”, vol.7, No.2 Apr-June 2016, pp.108-112.
[7] Mayank Chawla, Saurabh Sharma, Jayanthi Sivaswamy, Kishore L. T, “A Method for Automatic Detection and Classification of Stroke from Brain CT Images”, IEEE International Conference in Medicine and Biology Society”, Sept 2009.
[8] Priya Thamman, Ashish Verma, “Contrast Enhancement of Medical Images-A Review”, International Journal of Innovations & Advancement in Computer Science”, vol.3, No.4, June 2014, pp.124-128.
[9] Sandeep Kumar, Puneet Verma, “Comparison of Different Enhanced Image Denoising with Multiple Histogram Techniques”, International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, vol.2, No.2, May 2012, pp.208-213.