{"title":"Multisymplectic Geometry and Noether Symmetries for the Field Theories and the Relativistic Mechanics","authors":"H. Loumi-Fergane, A. Belaidi","volume":127,"journal":"International Journal of Mathematical and Computational Sciences","pagesStart":300,"pagesEnd":315,"ISSN":"1307-6892","URL":"https:\/\/publications.waset.org\/pdf\/10007927","abstract":"
The problem of symmetries in field theory has been analyzed using geometric frameworks, such as the multisymplectic models by using in particular the multivector field formalism. In this paper, we expand the vector fields associated to infinitesimal symmetries which give rise to invariant quantities as Noether currents for classical field theories and relativistic mechanic using the multisymplectic geometry where the Poincaré-Cartan form has thus been greatly simplified using the Second Order Partial Differential Equation (SOPDE) for multi-vector fields verifying Euler equations. These symmetries have been classified naturally according to the construction of the fiber bundle used. In this work, unlike other works using the analytical method, our geometric model has allowed us firstly to distinguish the angular moments of the gauge field obtained during different transformations while these moments are gathered in a single expression and are obtained during a rotation in the Minkowsky space. Secondly, no conditions are imposed on the Lagrangian of the mechanics with respect to its dependence in time and in qi<\/sup>, the currents obtained naturally from the transformations are respectively the energy and the momentum of the system.<\/p>\r\n","references":"[1]\tA. Awane, \u201ck-symplectic structures\u201d, J. Math. Phys. 33 (1992), 4046-4052.\r\n[2]\tA. Awane, M. Goze, \u201cPfaffian systems, k-symplectic systems\u201d. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000).\r\n[3]\tF. Munteanu, A. M. Rey, M. Salgado, \u201cThe G\u00fcnther\u2019s formalism in classical field theory: momentum map and reduction\u201d, J. Math. Phys. 45 (5) (2004) 1730\u20131751.\r\n[4]\tC. G\u00fcnther, \u201cThe polysymplectic Hamiltonian formalism in field theory and calculus of variations I: The local case\u201d J. Differential Geom. 25 (1987) 23-53.\r\n[5]\tM. de Le\u00f3n, E. Merino, J.A. Oubi\u0303na, P. Rodrigues, M. Salgado, \u201cHamiltonian systems on k-cosymplectic manifolds\u201d. J. Math. Phys. 39 (2) (1998) 876\u2013893.\r\n[6]\tM. de Le\u00f3n, E. Merino, M. Salgado, \u201ck-cosymplectic manifolds and Lagrangian field theories\u201d. J. Math. Phys. 42 (5) (2001) 2092\u20132104.\r\n[7]\tJ. Kijowski, \u201cA finite-dimensional canonical formalism in the classical field theory\u201d, Comm. Math. Phys. 30 (1973), 99-128.\r\n[8]\tJ. Kijowski, W. Szczyrba, \u201cMultisymplectic manifolds and the geometrical construction of the Poisson brackets in the classical field theory\u201d. G\u00e9om\u00e9trie symplectique et physique math\u00e9matique (Colloq. International C.N.R.S., Aix-en-Provence, 1974) (1974) 347-349.\r\n[9]\tJ. Kijowski, W. M. Tulczyjew, A symplectic framework for field theories. Lecture Notes in Physics, 107. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979.\r\n[10]\tJ. Sniatycki, \u201cOn the geometric structure of classical field theory in Lagrangian formulation\u201d, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 68 (1970) 475-484.\r\n[11]\tP. L. Garc\u00eda, A. P\u00e9rez-Rend\u00f3n, \u201cSymplectic approach to the theory of quantized fields. I\u201d. Comm. Math. Phys. 13 (1969) 24-44.\r\n[12]\tP. L. Garc\u00eda, A. P\u00e9rez-Rend\u00f3n, \u201cSymplectic approach to the theory of quantized fields, II\u201d. Arch. Ratio. Mech. Anal. 43 (1971), 101-124.\r\n[13]\tH. Goldschmidt, S. Sternberg, \u201cThe Hamilton-Cartan formalism in the calculus of variations\u201d. Ann. Inst. Fourier 23 (1973), 203-267.\r\n[14]\tG. Martin, \u201cDynamical structures fork-vector fields\u201d, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 27 (1988), 571-585.\r\n[15]\tG. Martin, \u201cA Darboux theorem for multi-symplectic manifolds\u201d, Lett. Math. Phys.16 (1988), 133-138.\r\n[16]\tM. J. Gotay, \u201cAn exterior differential systems approach to the Cartan form. In: Symplectic geometry and mathematical physics\u201d (Aix-en-Provence, 1990). Progr. Math. 99, Birkh \u0308auser Boston, MA, 1991, 160-188.\r\n[17]\tM. J. Gotay, \u201cA multisymplectic framework for classical field theory and the calculus of variations, I. Covariant Hamiltonian formalism\u201d. In: Mechanics, analysis and geometry: 200 years after Lagrange. North-Holland Delta Ser. North-Holland, Amsterdam, (1991) 203-235. \r\n[18]\tM. J. Gotay, \u201cA multisymplectic framework for classical field theory and the calculus of variations, II. Space -time decomposition\u201d. Differential Geom. App. 1(1991), 375-390.\r\n[19]\tM. J. Gotay, J. Isenberg, and J. E. Marsden, \u201cMomentum Maps and Classical Relativistic Fields, Part I: Covariant Field Theory\u201d, www.arxiv.org: (2004) physics\/9801019.\r\n[20]\tF. Cantrijn, A. Ibort, M. de Le\u00f3n, \u201cOn the geometry of multisymplectic manifolds\u201d, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 66 (1999), 303-330.\r\n[21]\tF. Cantrijn, A. Ibort, M. de Le\u00f3n, \u201cHamiltonian structures on multisymplectic manifolds\u201d, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino, 54 (1996), 225-236.\r\n[22]\tH. Loumi-Fergane, A. Belaidi, \u201cMultisymplectic geometry and k-cosymplectic structure for the field theories and the relativistic mechanics\u201d. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 10, 1350001 (2013) (22 pages).\r\n[23]\tN. Rom\u00e1n-Roy, \u201cK-symplectic formulation for field theories. An introduction to symmetries.\u201d (Seminar given in 2007).\r\n[24]\tN. Rom\u00e1n-Roy, M. Salgado, S. Vilari\u00f1o, \u201cSymmetries and conservation laws in the G\u00fcnther k-symplectic formalism of field theory\u201d, Rev. Math. Phys. 19 (10) (2007), 1117-1147.\r\n[25]\tJ. C. Marrero, N. Rom\u00e1n-Roy, M. Salgado, S. Vilari\u00f1o, \u201cOn a Kind Noether Symmetries and Conservation Laws in k-Cosymplectic Field Theory\u201d, J. Math. Phys, 52 (2011), 22901. \r\n[26]\tA. Echeverr\u00eda-Enr\u00edquez, M. C. Mu\u00f1oz-Lecanda, N. Rom\u00e1n-Roy, \u201cMultivector field formulation of Hamiltonian field theories: Equations and Symmetries\u201d, J. Phys. A. 32 (48) (1999), 8461-8484.\r\n[27]\tM. de Le\u00f3n, D. M.de Diego, A.S. Merino, \u201cSymmetries in classical field theories\u201d, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.1 (5) (2004), 651-710.\r\n[28]\tH. Loumi and M. Tahiri, Reports On Mathematical Physics 33 (1993), 367-373. \r\n[29]\tA. Echeverr\u00eda-Enr\u00edquez, M.C. Mu\u00f1oz-Lecanda, N. Rom\u00e1n-Roy, \u201cGeometry of Lagrangian first-order classical field theories\u201d, Forts. Phys 44 (1996), 235-280.\r\n[30]\tA. Echeverr\u00eda-Enr\u00edquez, M.C. Mu\u00f1oz-Lecanda, N. Rom\u00e1n-Roy, \u201cMultivector fields and connections. Setting Lagrangian equations in field theories\u201d, J. Math. Phys. 39 (9), (1998) 4578-4603.\r\n[31]\tN. Rom\u00e1n-Roy, 2005 \u201cMultisymplectic lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms of first-order classical field theories\u201d (Preprint math-phys \/0506022).\r\n[32]\tG. Arytyunov, \u201cClassical Field Theory\u201d Preprint typeset in JHEP Style.\r\n[33]\tH. Erbin, \u201cTh\u00e9ories des champs classiques\u201d version: 12 f\u00e9vrier 2011.\r\n[34]\tD. Farquet, \u201cTh\u00e9or\u00e8me de Noether en QFT\u201d EPFL-Physique.\r\n[35]\tJ.M. Raimond, \u201cTh\u00e9orie Classique des Champs\u201d, Septembre 9, 2014.\r\n[36]\tM. de Le\u00f3n, D.M. de Diego, \u201cConservation Laws and Symmetries in Economic Growth Models: a Geometrical Approach\u201d, Extracta Mathematicae. 13 (3) (1998) 335-348.","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 127, 2017"}