Optimal load factors (dead, live and seismic) used for the design of buildings may be different, depending of the seismic ground motion characteristics to which they are subjected, which are closely related to the type of soil conditions where the structures are located. The influence of the type of soil on those load factors, is analyzed in the present study. A methodology that is useful for establishing optimal load factors that minimize the cost over the life cycle of the structure is employed; and as a restriction, it is established that the probability of structural failure must be less than or equal to a prescribed value. The life-cycle cost model used here includes different types of costs. The optimization methodology is applied to two groups of reinforced concrete buildings. One set (consisting on 4-, 7-, and 10-story buildings) is located on firm ground (with a dominant period Ts=0.5 s) and the other (consisting on 6-, 12-, and 16-story buildings) on soft soil (Ts=1.5 s) of Mexico City. Each group of buildings is designed using different combinations of load factors. The statistics of the maximums inter-story drifts (associated with the structural capacity) are found by means of incremental dynamic analyses. The buildings located on firm zone are analyzed under the action of 10 strong seismic records, and those on soft zone, under 13 strong ground motions. All the motions correspond to seismic subduction events with magnitudes M=6.9. Then, the structural damage and the expected total costs, corresponding to each group of buildings, are estimated. It is concluded that the optimal load factors combination is different for the design of buildings located on firm ground than that for buildings located on soft soil.<\/p>\r\n","references":"[1]\tN. Gayton, A. Mohamed, J. D. Sorensen, M. Pendola, and M. Lemaire, \u201cCalibration methods for reliability-based design codes,\u201d Structural Safety, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 91-121, 2004.\r\n[2]\tD. De Le\u00f3n, \u201cIntegration socio-economics in the development of criteria for optimal aseismic design of R\/C buildings,\u201d PhD. Thesis, University of California, 1991.\r\n[3]\tY. K. Wen, and Y. J. Kang, \u201cMinimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. II: applications,\u201d Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 338-346, 2001.\r\n[4]\tE. Aktas, F. Moses, and M. Ghosn, \u201cCost and safety optimization of structural design specifications,\u201d Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 205-212, 2001.\r\n[5]\tN. D. Lagaros, \u201cLife-cycle cost analysis of design practices for RC framed structures,\u201d Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 425-442, 2007.\r\n[6]\tA. H.-S. Ang, \u201cLife-cycle considerations in risk-informed decisions for design of civil infrastructures,\u201d Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 7, no. (1-2), pp. 3-9, 2011.\r\n[7]\tL. Esteva, D. Campos, and O. D\u00edaz-L\u00f3pez, \u201cLife-cycle optimization in earthquake engineering,\u201d Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 33-49, 2011.\r\n[8]\tC. Ch. Mitropoulou, N. D. Lagaros, and M. Papadrakakis, \u201cLife-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions,\u201d Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 1311-1331, 2011.\r\n[9]\tG. Barone, and D. M. Frangopol, \u201cLife-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures by multiobjective optimization involving reliability, risk, availability, hazard and cost,\u201d Structural Safety, vol. 48, pp. 40-50, 2015.\r\n[10]\tJ. Boj\u00f3rquez, S. E. Ruiz, B. Ellingwood, A. Reyes-Salazar, and E. Boj\u00f3rquez, \u201cReliability-based optimal load factores for seismic design of buildings\u201d, submitted for publication in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.\r\n[11]\tC. A. Cornell, \u201cEngineering seismic hazard analysis,\u201d Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1583-1606, 1968.\r\n[12]\tL. Esteva, \u201cBases para la formulaci\u00f3n de decisiones de dise\u00f1o s\u00edsmico,\u201d PhD. Thesis, Facultad de Ingenier\u00eda, UNAM, M\u00e9xico, 1968.\r\n[13]\tC. A. Cornell, F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch, \u201cThe probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC\/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines,\u201d Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 128, pp. 526\u2013533, 2002.\r\n[14]\tM. A. Montiel, and S. E. Ruiz, \u201cInfluence of structural capacity uncertainty on seismic reliability of building structures under narrow-band motions,\u201d Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 36, 1915-1934, 2007.\r\n[15]\tD. Vamvatsikos, and C. A. Cornell, \u201cIncremental dynamic analysis,\u201d Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, 491-514, 2001.\r\n[16]\tR. Y. Rubinstein, \u201cSimulation and the Monte Carlo Method,\u201d John Wiley and Sons, pp. 372, 1981.\r\n[17]\tI. Vel\u00e1zquez, \u201cCostos iniciales de edificios de C\/R en la zona IIIb considerando distintas combinaciones de factores de carga,\u201d Master Thesis, Programa de Posgrado en Ingenier\u00eda, UNAM, M\u00e9xico, 2015.\r\n[18]\tD. Tolentino, and S. E. Ruiz, \u201cTime intervals for maintenance of offshore structures based on multiobjetive optimization,\u201d Mathematical Problems is Engineering, doi: http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1155\/2013\/125856, 2013.\r\n[19]\tD. De Le\u00f3n, and A. H.-S. Ang, \u201cA damage model for reinforced concrete buildings, Futher study with the Mexico City earthquake,\u201d Structural Safety and Reliability, Balkema Rotterdam, pp. 2081-2087, 1995.\r\n[20]\tA. Surahman, and K. B. Rojaniani, \u201cReliability based optimum design of concrete frames, \u201cJournal of the Structural Division, ASCE, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 71-76, 1983.\r\n[21]\tInstituto de Ingenier\u00eda, UNAM, \u201cEfectos de los sismos de septiembre de 1985 en las construcciones de la Ciudad de M\u00e9xico,\u201d Mexico Distrito Federal, 1985.\r\n[22]\tTokyo Metropolitan Government, \u201cReport in the investigation of the earthquake in Mexico,\u201d June 1986.","publisher":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology","index":"Open Science Index 126, 2017"}