Kinematic Behavior of Geogrid Reinforcements during Earthquakes
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Kinematic Behavior of Geogrid Reinforcements during Earthquakes

Authors: Ahmed Hosny Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed Abdel-Moneim

Abstract:

Reinforced earth structures are generally subjected to cyclic loading generated from earthquakes. This paper presents a summary of the results and analyses of a testing program carried out in a large-scale multi-function geosynthetic testing apparatus that accommodates soil samples up to 1.0 m3. This apparatus performs different shear and pullout tests under both static and cyclic loading. The testing program was carried out to investigate the controlling factors affecting soil/geogrid interaction under cyclic loading. The extensibility of the geogrids, the applied normal stresses, the characteristics of the cyclic loading (frequency, and amplitude), and initial static load within the geogrid sheet were considered in the testing program. Based on the findings of the testing program, the effect of these parameters on the pullout resistance of geogrids, as well as the displacement mobility under cyclic loading were evaluated. Conclusions and recommendations for the design of reinforced earth walls under cyclic loading are presented.

Keywords: Geogrid, Soil, Interface, Cyclic Loading, Pullout, and Large scale Testing.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338798

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1803

References:


[1] Abdel-Rahman, A., Ashmawy, A.K., Abdel-Moniem, M., “An Apparatus for Direct Shear, Pullout and Uniaxial Testing of Geogrids” Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, Vol. 1, No.4, 2007, pp.415-430.
[2] Bathurst, R.J., and Cai, Z., “Pseudo-Static Seismic Analysis of Geosynthetic Reinforced Segmental Retaining Walls”, Geosynthetic International, Vol.2, No.5, 1995, pp. 787-830.
[3] Fannin, R. and Raju, D, “Large-Scale Pullout Test Results on Geosynthetics”, Vancouver, Canada-Geosynthetics, 1993.
[4] Ling, H.I., DovLeshchinsky, Jui-Pin Wang, Yoshiyuki Mohri, and Arik Rosen, “Seismic Response of Geocell Retaining Walls”, Experimental Studies”,Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering, ASCE / APRIL 2009, pp.515-52.
[5] Ling, H.I., Leshchinsky, D., and ChouN.S., “Post-Earthquake Investigation on Several Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls and Slopes during the Ji-Ji Earthquake of Taiwan”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol 21, 2001, pp. 297-313.
[6] Nayeri, A., and Fakharian, K., “Study on Pullout Behavior of Uniaxial HDPE GeogridsUnder Monotonic and Cyclic Loads”, International Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol.7, No.4, Dec 2008.
[7] Pacific earthquake Engineering research center (PEER), Some Observations of Geotechnical Aspects of the February 28, 2001, Nisqually Earthquake in Olympia, South Seattle, and Tacoma, Washington.
[8] Pamuk, A., Hoe I. Ling, DovLeshchinsky, ErolKalkan, KorhanAdalier, “Behavior of Reinforced Wall System During the 1999 Kocaeli (IZMIT), Turkey Earthquake.”, Fifth international conference on case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, New York, April 2004.
[9] Palmeira, M. E., “Bearing force mobilisation in pull-out tests on geogrids”, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 22, pp.481-509, 2004.
[10] Sankey, J.E., and Segrestin, P., “Evaluation of Seismic Performance in Mechanically Stabilized Earth Structures”, The Reinforced Earth Company, Vienna, Virginia, USA 2001.
[11] Wartman, J., Efrain A. Rondinel, and Adrian Rodriguez-Marek., “Performance and Analyses of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls in the Tecomán, Mexico Earthquake”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 20, No. 3, August 1, 2006.
[12] Wilson-Fahmy, R.F., Koerner, R.M., and Sansone, L.J., “Experimental Behavior of Polymeric Geogrids in Pullout”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 4, Apr., 1994.