A Hybrid Method for Determination of Effective Poles Using Clustering Dominant Pole Algorithm
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32807
A Hybrid Method for Determination of Effective Poles Using Clustering Dominant Pole Algorithm

Authors: Anuj Abraham, N. Pappa, Daniel Honc, Rahul Sharma

Abstract:

In this paper, an analysis of some model order reduction techniques is presented. A new hybrid algorithm for model order reduction of linear time invariant systems is compared with the conventional techniques namely Balanced Truncation, Hankel Norm reduction and Dominant Pole Algorithm (DPA). The proposed hybrid algorithm is known as Clustering Dominant Pole Algorithm (CDPA), is able to compute the full set of dominant poles and its cluster center efficiently. The dominant poles of a transfer function are specific eigenvalues of the state space matrix of the corresponding dynamical system. The effectiveness of this novel technique is shown through the simulation results.

Keywords: Balanced truncation, Clustering, Dominant pole, Hankel norm, Model reduction.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099601

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2629

References:


[1] Huijun Gao, et al., “Hankel norm approximation of linear systems with time-varying delay: continuous and discrete cases,” Int. J. Control, 2004, Vol. 77, No. 17, 1503–1520.
[2] Safonov, M.G., and R.Y. Chiang, “A Schur Method for Balanced Model Reduction”, IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., Vol. 34, No. 7, July 1989, pp. 729-733.
[3] A.C. Antoulas, D.C. Sorensen. “Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems: An overview,” Int. J. Appl. Math. Comp. Sci., 11(5):1093{1121, 2001.
[4] Aguirre, L. A. “Quantitative Measure of Modal Dominance for Continuous Systems,” In Proc. of the 32nd Conf. on Decision and Control 1993, pp. 2405–2410.
[5] Martins, N., Pinto, H. J. C. P., and Lima, L. T. G. “Efficient methods for finding transfer function zeros of power systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. Vol.7, 3 in 1992, 1350–1361.
[6] Martins, N., Lima, L. T. G., and Pinto, H. J. C. P. “Computing dominant poles of power system transfer functions,” IEEE Trans. Power Sys., Vol. 11, 1 in 1996, 162–170.
[7] S. K. Nagar, and S. K. Singh, “An algorithmic approach for system decomposition and balanced realized model reduction,” J. Franklin Inst., Vol. 341, pp. 615-630, 2004.
[8] A.K. Mittal, R. Prasad, and S.P. Sharma, “Reduction of linear dynamic systems using an error minimization technique,” J. Inst. Eng. India IE(I) J. EL, Vol. 84, pp. 201-206, 2004.
[9] G. Parmar, S. Mukherjee, and R. Prasad, “System reduction using factor division algorithm and eigen spectrum analysis,” Int. J. Applied Math. Modeling, Vol. 31, pp. 2542-2552, 2007.
[10] J. Rommes and N. Martins, “Efficient computation of transfer function dominant poles using subspace acceleration,” IEEE Trans. Power System., Vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1218–1226, 2006.
[11] Vinod Kumar, J. P. Tiwari, “Order Reducing of Linear System using Clustering Method Factor Division Algorithm,” Int. J. of Applied Information Systems (IJAIS) – ISSN : 2249-0868, Volume 3–No.5 , 2012.
[12] Mihály Petreczky, et al., “Balanced truncation for linear switched systems,” Elsevier, Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Vol. 10, 2013, pp. 4–20.
[13] Rommes, J., Martins, N., “Computing transfer function dominant poles of large second-order dynamical systems,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 30, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 2137-2157.