Relations of Progression in Cognitive Decline with Initial EEG Resting-State Functional Network in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Relations of Progression in Cognitive Decline with Initial EEG Resting-State Functional Network in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Authors: Chia-Feng Lu, Yuh-Jen Wang, Yu-Te Wu, Sui-Hing Yan

Abstract:

This study aimed at investigating whether the functional brain networks constructed using the initial EEG (obtained when patients first visited hospital) can be correlated with the progression of cognitive decline calculated as the changes of mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores between the latest and initial examinations. We integrated the time–frequency cross mutual information (TFCMI) method to estimate the EEG functional connectivity between cortical regions, and the network analysis based on graph theory to investigate the organization of functional networks in aMCI. Our finding suggested that higher integrated functional network with sufficient connection strengths, dense connection between local regions, and high network efficiency in processing information at the initial stage may result in a better prognosis of the subsequent cognitive functions for aMCI. In conclusion, the functional connectivity can be a useful biomarker to assist in prediction of cognitive declines in aMCI.

Keywords: Cognitive decline, functional connectivity, MCI, MMSE.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096865

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2357

References:


[1] R. C. Petersen, "Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: is MCI too late?," Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 6, p. 324, 2009.
[2] A. Pozueta, E. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. L. Vazquez-Higuera, I. Mateo, P. Sánchez-Juan, S. González-Perez, J. Berciano, and O. Combarros, "Detection of early Alzheimer's disease in MCI patients by the combination of MMSE and an episodic memory test," BMC neurology, vol. 11, p. 78, 2011.
[3] S. Landau, D. Harvey, C. Madison, E. Reiman, N. Foster, P. Aisen, R. Petersen, L. Shaw, J. Trojanowski, and C. Jack, "Comparing predictors of conversion and decline in mild cognitive impairment," Neurology, vol. 75, pp. 230-238, 2010.
[4] R.C. Petersen, “Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity,” J. Intern. Med., vol. 256, pp. 183–194, 2004.
[5] P. Missonnier, M. P. Deiber, G. Gold, F.R. Herrmann, P. Millet, A. Michon, L. Fazio-Costa, V. Ibañez, P. Giannakopoulos, “Working memory load–related electroencephalographic parameters can differentiate progressive from stable mild cognitive impairment,” Neuroscience, vol. 150, Issue 2, pp. 346-356, 2007.
[6] D. Popivanov, J. Dushanova, “Non-linear EEG dynamic changes and their probable relation to voluntary movement organization,” Neuroreport, vol. 10, pp. 1397–401, 1999.
[7] C. Andrew, G. Pfurtscheller, “Lack of bilateral coherence of post-movement central beta oscillations in the human electroencephalogram,” Neurosci. Lett., vol. 273, pp. 89–92, 1999.
[8] P.L. Nunez, R. Srinivasan, A.F. Westdorp, R.S. Wijesinghe, D.M. Tucker, R.B. Silberstein et al., “EEG coherency: I: statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales,” Electroencephalogr. Clin . Neurophysiol., vol. 103, pp. 499–515, 1997.
[9] C.F. Lu, S. Teng, C.I. Hung, P.J. Tseng, L.T. Lin, P.L. Lee, Y.T. Wu, “Reorganization of functional connectivity during the motor task using EEG time–frequency cross mutual information analysis,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 122, no. 8, pp. 1569-1579, 2011.
[10] C.C. Chen, J.C. Hsieh, Y.Z. Wu, P.L. Lee, S.S. Chen, D.M. Niddam, T.C. Yeh, Y.T. Wu, “Mutual-information-based approach for neural connectivity during self-paced finger lifting task,” Human brain mapping, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 265-280, 2008.
[11] C. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell Syst Tech J, vol. 27, pp. 379–426, 1948.
[12] M.F. Folstein, S.E. Folstein, P.R. McHugh, “Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician,” J. Psychiatr. Res., vol. 12, pp. 189–198, 1975.
[13] J.C. Morris, “The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules,” Neurology, vol. 43, pp. 2412–2414, 1993.
[14] A. Delorme, S. Makeig, “EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.” J. Neurosci. Methods., vol. 134, pp. 9–21, 2004.
[15] A. Gramfort, T. Papadopoulo, E. Olivi, M. Clerc, “OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics,” BioMedical Engineering OnLine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp.45, 2010.
[16] M.S. Hamalainen, R.J. Ilmoniemi, “Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 32, pp. 35–42, 1994.
[17] F.H. Lin, T. Witzel, S.P. Ahlfors, S.M. Stufflebeam, J.W. Belliveau et al, “Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates,” Neuroimage, vol. 31, pp. 160–171, 2006.
[18] F. Tadel, S. Baillet, J.C. Mosher, D. Pantazis, R.M. Leahy, “Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 879716, 2011..
[19] D.L. Collins, A.P. Zijdenbos, V. Kollokian et al., “Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 463–468, 1998.
[20] A. Klein, J. Tourville, “101 labeled brain images and a consistent human cortical labeling protocol,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 6, article 171, 2012.
[21] M.D. Humphries, K. Gurney, “Network ‘Small-world-ness’: a quantitative method for determining canonical network equivalence,” PLoS One, vol. 3, article e0002051, 2008.
[22] V. Latora, M. Marchiori, “Efficient behavior of small-world networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 87, article 198701, 2001.
[23] E. Bullmore, O. Sporns, “Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 10, pp. 186–198, 2009.
[24] S. Achard, E. Bullmore, “Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks,” PLoS Comput. Biol., vol. 3, no. 2, article e17, 2007.
[25] Y. Benjamini, Y. Hochberg, “Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,” J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol., vol. 57, pp. 289–300, 1995.
[26] Y. He, Z. Chen, G. Gong, A. Evans, “Neuronal Networks in Alzheimer’s Disease,” Neuroscientist, vol. 15, pp. 333-350, 2009.
[27] Y. Liu, C. Yu, X. Zhang, J. Liu, Y. Duan, A.F. Alexander-Bloch, B. Liu, T. Jiang, E. Bullmore, “Impaired long distance functional connectivity and weighted network architecture in Alzheimer's disease,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 24, no. 6, pp.1422-1435, 2014.
[28] B. Tóth, B. File, R. Boha, Z. Kardos, Z. Hidasi, Z.A. Gaál, E. Csibri, P. Salacz, C.J. Stam, M. Molnár, “EEG network connectivity changes in mild cognitive impairment — Preliminary results,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 92, Issue 1, pp. 1-7, 2014.