A Questionnaire-Based Survey: Therapist’s Response towards the Upper Limb Disorder Learning Tool
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
A Questionnaire-Based Survey: Therapist’s Response towards the Upper Limb Disorder Learning Tool

Authors: Noor Ayuni Che Zakaria, Takashi Komeda, Cheng Yee Low, Kaoru Inoue, Fazah Akhtar Hanapiah

Abstract:

Previous studies have shown that there are arguments regarding the reliability and validity of the Ashworth and Modified Ashworth Scale towards evaluating patients diagnosed with upper limb disorders. These evaluations depended on the raters’ experiences. This initiated us to develop an upper limb disorder part-task trainer that is able to simulate consistent upper limb disorders, such as spasticity and rigidity signs, based on the Modified Ashworth Scale to improve the variability occurring between raters and intra-raters themselves. By providing consistent signs, novice therapists would be able to increase training frequency and exposure towards various levels of signs. A total of 22 physiotherapists and occupational therapists participated in the study. The majority of the therapists agreed that with current therapy education, they still face problems with inter-raters and intra-raters variability (strongly agree 54%; n = 12/22, agree 27%; n = 6/22) in evaluating patients’ conditions. The therapists strongly agreed (72%; n = 16/22) that therapy trainees needed to increase their frequency of training; therefore believe that our initiative to develop an upper limb disorder training tool will help in improving the clinical education field (strongly agree and agree 63%; n = 14/22).

Keywords: Upper limb disorders, Clinical education tool, Inter/intra-raters variability, Spasticity, Modified Ashworth Scale.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1096628

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1827

References:


[1] Patrick, E. and Ada, L. (2006). The Tardieu Scale Differentiates Contracture from Spasticity Whereas the Ashworth Scale is Confounded by it. Clinical Rehabil 20 (2): 173-182
[2] Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Proce CI, Curless RH, Barnes MP, Rodgers H (1999). A Review of the Properties and Limitations of the Ashworth and Modified Ashworth Scales as Measures of Spasticity. Clinical Rehabil 13:373-383
[3] Levin MF (2005). On the Nature and Measurement of Spasticity. Clinical Neurophysiology 116:1754-1755
[4] T. Mouri, H. Kawasaki, Y. Nishimoto, T. Aoki, Y. Ishigure, and M. Tanahashi (2008). Robot Hand Imitating Disabled Person for Education/Training of Rehabilitation. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 20(2): 280-288
[5] T. Kikuchi, K. Oda, and J. Furusho (2010). Leg-robot for Demonstration of Spastic Movements of Brain-Injured Patients with Compact MR Fluid Clutch. Advanced Robotics 24(4): 671-678
[6] Noor Ayuni CZ, Takashi Komeda, Cheng Yee Low (2012). Design of Upper Limb Patient Simulator. Procedia Engineering 41: 1374-1378
[7] C. Z. Noor Ayuni, T. Komeda, L. Cheng Yee, and K. Inoue, "Emulation of muscle tone of upper limb spasticity and rigidity," in 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), 2013 San Diego, CA, 2013, pp. 1590-1593