Field Application of Reduced Crude Conversion Spent Lime
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32794
Field Application of Reduced Crude Conversion Spent Lime

Authors: Brian H. Marsh, John H. Grove

Abstract:

Gypsum is being applied to ameliorate subsoil acidity and to overcome the problem of very slow lime movement from surface lime applications. Reduced Crude Conversion Spent Lime (RCCSL) containing anhydrite was evaluated for use as a liming material with specific consideration given to the movement of sulfate into the acid subsoil. Agricultural lime and RCCSL were applied at 0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 times the lime requirement of 6.72 Mg ha-1 to an acid Trappist silt loam (TypicHapuldult). Corn [Zea mays (L.)]was grown following lime material application and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]was grown in the second year.Soil pH increased rapidly with the addition of the RCCSL material. Over time there was no difference in soil pH between the materials but there was with increasing rate. None of the observed changes in plant nutrient concentration had an impact on yield. Grain yield was higher for the RCCSL amended treatments in the first year but not in the second. There was a significant increase in soybean grain yield from the full lime requirement treatments over no lime.

Keywords: Soil acidity, corn, soybean, liming materials.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093828

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1724

References:


[1] Oats, K. and A. Caldwell. 1985. Use of by-product gypsum to alleviate soil acidity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49:915-918.
[2] Alva, A., M. Sumner, and A. Noble. 1988. Alleviation of aluminum toxicity by phosphogypsum. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 19:385-403.
[3] Shainberg, I., M. Sumner, W. Miller, M Farina, M. Pavan, and M. Fey. 1989. Use of gypsum on soils: A review. Pp. 1-111. In B. Stewart (ed.) Advances in soil science. Vol. 9. Springer-Verlag. New York.
[4] Hammel, J., M. Sumner, and H. Shadhandeh. 1985. Effect of physical and chemical profile modification on soybean and corn production. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49:1508-1511.
[5] Pavan, M., F. Bingham, and P. Pratt. 1984. Redistribution of exchangeable calcium, magnesium, and aluminum following lime or gypsum applications to a BrazilianOxisol. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:33-38.
[6] Rayor, A. 1981. Effect of calcium concentration on growth and ion uptake of soybean plants in solution culture. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 105:59-64.
[7] Noble, A. M. Fey, and M. Sumner. 1988. Calcium-aluminum balance and the growth of soybean roots in nutrient solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:1651-1656.
[8] Souza, D. and K. Ritchy. 1986. Usodoeso gesso no solo de cerrado. pp 119-144. In An. Sem. UsoFosgogessoAgriculturea. EMBRAPA, Brazilia, D. F., Brazil.
[9] Shoemaker, H., E. McLean, and P. Pratt. 1961. Buffer methods for determining lime requirement of soil with appreciable amounts of extractable aluminum. Soil Sci. Soc. An. Proc. 25-274-277.
[10] Marsh, B., and J. Grove. 1992. Plant and soil chemical compositions as affected by a highly reactive alternative lime source containing sulfate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:1831-1836.
[11] Anonymous. 1987. Lime and fertilizer recommendations, 1987-1988. Kentucky Coop. Ext. Serv. Bull. AGR-1.
[12] Thomas, G. 1982. Exchangeable cations. P. 159-165. In A. Page (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
[13] Chapman, H. 1965. Diagnostic criteria for plants and soils. University of California, Riverside.
[14] Marsh, B. and J. Grove. 1992. Surface and subsurface soil acidity: Soybean root response to sulfate bearing spent lime. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:1837-1842.
[15] Silverbush, M. and S. Barber. 1985. Root growth, nutrient uptake and yield of soybean cultivars grown in the field. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 16:119-127.