A Comparative Study on Seismic Provisions Made in UBC-1997 and Saudi Building Code for RC Buildings
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32794
A Comparative Study on Seismic Provisions Made in UBC-1997 and Saudi Building Code for RC Buildings

Authors: S. Nazar, M. A. Ismaeil

Abstract:

This paper presents a comparative study of static analysis procedure for seismic performance based on UBC-1997 and SBC-301-2007(Saudi Arabia). These building codes define different ductility classes and corresponding response reduction factors based on material, configuration and detailing of reinforcements. Codes differ significantly in specifying the procedures to estimate base shear, drift and effective stiffness of structural members. One of the major improvements made in new SBC (based on IBC-2003) is ground motion parameters used for seismic design. In old SBC (based on UBC) maps have been based on seismic zones. However new SBC provide contour maps giving spectral response quantities. In this approach, a case study of RC frame building located in two different cities and with different ductility classes has been performed. Moreover, equivalent static method based on SBC-301 and UBC-1997 is used to explore the variation in results based on two codes, particularly design base shear, lateral loads and story drifts.

Keywords: Ductility Classes, Equivalent Static method, RC Frames, SBC-301-2007, Story drifts, UBC-1997.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1092900

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 4085

References:


[1] Shunsuke Otani, "Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings” Journal of Advanced Concrete TechnologyVol.2, No.1. (2003) pp 3-24.
[2] UBC-1997: Structural Design Requirements, Vol. 2: International Conference of Building Officials, California, USA, 1997
[3] Yogendra Singh, V.N. Khose, D.H. Lang: "A Comparative Study of Code Provisions for Ductile RC Frame Buildings” 15 WCEE 2012.
[4] M. Al‐Haddad, G. H. Siddiqi, R. Al‐Zaid, A. Arafah, A. Necioglu, and N. Turkelli (1994) "A Basis for Evaluation of Seismic Hazard and Design Criteria for Saudi Arabia” Earthquake Spectra: May 1994, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 231-258.
[5] Saudi Building Code SBC-301-2007: Loads and Forces Requirements, Saudi Building Code National Committee (2007).
[6] B.S. Taranath: "Wind and Earthquake Resistant Buildings, Structural Analysis and Design” John A. Martin & Associates, Inc. (2005). pp 104-114.
[7] ETABS V.13: Structural Analysis program. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, USA- 2013.