Effects of Drought Stress on Qualitative and Quantitative Traits of Mungbean
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Effects of Drought Stress on Qualitative and Quantitative Traits of Mungbean

Authors: Amir Mirzaei, Rahim Naseri, Parvaneh Vafa, Meysam Moradi

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effect of drought stress and row spacing on grain yield and associated traits of Mungbean, an experiment was conducted as a factorial in based on randomized complete block design with three replications in Ilam station, Iran during 2008-2009 growing season. This experiment was conducted in four stages on one kind of Mungbean named Gohar. The experimental factors including (80, 110 and 140mm cumulative evaporation from class A pan) and row spacing (25, 50, and 75cm) were selected. The results of the experiment showed that the varieties affected by the treatment showed significant differences. The highest total yield was obtained in the condition in which evaporation of water was 80mm. Of course some traits such as grain yield did not show a significant difference between the conditions in which evaporation of the irrigation water was 80 and 110mm. The traits under study also showed a significant difference to different raw spacing. Row spacing of 50cm had a higher total yield compared to other raw spaces. It was due to the higher number of pods per plant and grain weight. The interaction of drought stress and row spacing showed that in the condition in which the row space is 50 cm and the evaporation of the irrigation water is 80mm, the highest number of grain is achieved.

Keywords: Stress, Grain yield, Mungbean, Row spacing.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1091940

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2204

References:


[1] M.A. Nadeem, R. Ahmad and S. Ahmad, "Effect of seed inoculation and different Fertilizer levels on the growth and yield of mungbean (Vigna radiate L.)”, Journal of Agronomy. 3:40-42. 2004.
[2] M.M. Bashandi and J.M. Poehlman, "Photoperiod response in mungbean (Vihna radiate L.)”, Euphytica. 23: 691- 697. 1974.
[3] R.D. Vieira, D.M. Teerony and D.B. Egli, "Effect of drought stress on soybean seed germination and vigor”. J. Seed Technol.16:12-21. 1991.
[4] J. Levitt, "Response of plants to environmental stress. Chilling, freezing, and high temperature stress”, 2:26-54. 1980.
[5] B. Hung, "Role of root morphological and physiology characteristics in drought resistant of plant”, Plant Environmental Interaction. 39-64. 2002.
[6] S.N. Gupta, B.S. Dahiya, B.P.S. Malik and N.R. Bishnoi, "Response of chickpea to water deficits and drought stress”, Haryana Agriculture University Research Journal. 25:11-19. 1995.
[7] K. Turk and A.F. Hall, "Drought adaptation of cowpea growth and seed yield”, Agronomy Journal. 72:428-433. 1992.
[8] B.C. Trung and Y. Yoshida, "Influence of planting density on the nitrogen and grain productivity of mungbean”, J. Crop Sci. 84:266-272. 2006.
[9] B. Mouhouche, F. Ruget and R. Delecolle, "Effect of water stress applied at different phonological phases on yield component of dwarf bean”, Agronomie. 18:197-207. 1998.
[10] N. Sionit and P.J. Kramer, "Effect of water stress during difference stages of growth of soybean”, Agronomy journal. 62:274-278. 1997.
[11] C. Wanchai, S. Kaewpichit and S. Chareonpanit, "Effect of plant density on yield and seed quality of Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”, Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute. Bankok (Thailand). 1993.
[12] J.D.H. Keating, and P.J.M. Cooper, "Kabuli chickpea as a winter –sown crop in northern Syria: moisture relations and crop productivity”, Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge University) 100:667-680. 1998.
[13] J. A. Agosta, "Improving resistance to drought in common bean in Mexico”, Agronomia Mesomericana. 101:83-90. 1999.
[14] D. Gomes-Sanchez, G.P. Vannozzi, M. Baldini, S. Tahamasebi Enferadi and G. Dellvedove, "Effects of soil water availability in sunflower lines derived from inter specific crosses”, Italian Journal of Agronomy. 371-387. 2000.
[15] P. Miller, B. Mcconkey and G. Clayton, "Response of mung bean to plant density”, Pulse Crops New Sletter. 1:54-55. 2002.