Rural – Urban Partnership for Balanced Spatial Development in Latvia
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
Rural – Urban Partnership for Balanced Spatial Development in Latvia

Authors: Zane Bulderberga

Abstract:

Spatial dimension in development planning is becoming more topical in 21st century as a result of changes in population structure. Sustainable spatial development focuses on identifying and using territorial advantages to foster the harmonized development of the entire country, reducing negative effects of population concentration, increasing availability and mobility. EU and national development planning documents state polycentrism as main tool for balance spatial development, including investment concentration in growth centres. If mutual cooperation of growth centres as well as urban–rural cooperation is not fostered, then territorial differences can deepen and create unbalanced development.

The aim of research: to evaluate the urban–rural interaction, elaborating spatial development scenarios in framework of Latvian regional policy. To perform the research monographic, comparison, abstract–logical method, synthesis and analysis will be used when studying the theoretical aspects of research aiming at collecting the ideas of scientists from different countries, concepts, regulations as well as to create meaningful scientific discussion. Hierarchy analysis process (AHP) will be used to state further scenarios of spatial development in Latvia.

Experts from various institutions recognized urban – rural interaction and co-operation as an essential tool for the development. The most important factors for balanced spatial development in Latvia are availability of public transportation and improvement of service availability. Evaluating the three alternative scenarios, it was concluded that the urban – rural partnership will ensure a balanced development in Latvian regions.

Keywords: Rural – urban interaction, rural – urban cooperation, spatial development, AHP.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1091718

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2699

References:


[1] T.L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 1994.
[2] J. Čaplikas „Miesto ir kaimo dichotomija ir saveika”, in Proc. Annu. Conf. Regionų plėtra – 2003, Kaunas, Lihuania, 2003. Retrieved 05.12.2013 from http://www.lrti.lt/veikla/regionupletra2003_pran.html
[3] J. Kirstukas "Strengthening of Rural and Urban Interaction: Theoretical Backgrounds” in Engineering Economics No 4(39), The Economic Conditions of Enterprise Functioning, 2004. pp. 39-44.
[4] D.C. Okpala, "Promoting the Positive Rural-Urban Linkages Approach to Sustainable Development and Employment Creation: The Role of UN-HABITAT”, The 2nd FIG Regional Conference "Urban-Rural Interrelationship for Sustainable Environment”, 2003. Retrieved 05.12.2013 from http://www.fig.net/pub/morocco /proceedings/ program.htm
[5] H.E. Evans Rural-Urban Linkages and Structural Transformation. Report INU 71, Infrastructure and Urban Development Department, The World Bank, Washington DC, 1990.
[6] M. Douglass, "A Regional Network Strategy for Reciprocal Rural – Urban Linkages: An Agenda for Policy Research with Reference to Indonesia” in Third World Planning Review, Vol. 20, No 1, 1998, pp. 1-33.
[7] L. Kūle, "Urban – Rural Partnership and Territorial Cohesion in Latvian Regional Policy and Practice context”, Annu. Internat. Conf. "Regional Responses and Global Shifts: Actors, Institutions and Organisations” 2010. Retrieved 05.12.2013 from http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/2010/may-pecs/papers/Kule.pdf
[8] G.L. Gaile, "Improving Rural-Urban Linkages Through Small Town Market – based Development” in Third World Planning Review. Vol. 14, No 2, 1992, pp. 131-148.
[9] C. Tacoli, "Poverty, Inequality and the Underestimation of Rural-urban Linkages” in Development, Vol. 50(2), 1997, pp. 90-95.
[10] S. Davoudi, D. Stead, "Urban-Rural Relationships – an Introduction and Brief History”, in Built Environment, Vol. 28, No 4, 2002, pp. 269–277.
[11] J. Zscheischler, T. Wieth, C. Strauss, N. Gaasch, "Analyzing and Governing Urban-Rural Relation” in Proc. of Regional Studies Association Global ConferenceBeijing, China, 2012. Retrieved 05.12.2013 from http://www.regionalstudies.org/uploads/ Thomas_weith.pdf
[12] Z. Gao, „Development Path of Urban-rural Integration” in Asian Agricultural Research, Vol. 4, No 5, 2012, pp. 53-59.
[13] T. Unwin, "Urban-rural Interaction in Developing Countries: a Theoretical Perspective”. In: Potter R., Unwin T. (eds) The Geography of Urban-Rural Interaction in Developing Countries, Routledge, London, 1989, pp. 11-33.
[14] I. Smith, P. Courtney, Preparatory Study for a Seminar on Rural-Urban Linkages Fostering Social Cohesion: Discussion Paper. DG Regional Policy, 2009.
[15] T. Dax, P. Kahila, D. Meredith, P. Courtney,"Nurturing the Development Opportunities of Non-urban Regions: Perspectives and Policy Implications from the ENDORA Project”, Regional Studies Association Annual International Conference, 24.-26.5.2010, Pécs, Hungary, 2010. Retrieved 05.12.2013 from http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/2010/may-pecs/papers/Dax.pdf
[16] J. Artmann, C. Huttenloher, R. Kawka, J. Scholze, Partnership for sustainable rural – urban development: existing evidences. Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development, 2012
[17] P. Veneri, "Governance Approaches to Rural - Urban Partnerships: a Functional Perspective to Policy Making” 2nd European seminar on sustainable urban rural partnerships „Building urban rural partnerships in future European development programmes”, 2013. Retrieved 05.12.2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy /conferences/rurban/2013/programme_en.cfm
[18] European Regional/Spatial Planning Charter, 1983. Retrieved 10.03.2013 from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage /cemat/versioncharte/Charte_bil.pdf
[19] European Spatial Development Perspective, 1999. Retrieved 10.03.2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/ docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf
[20] Guiding Principles for Sustainable Spatial Development of European continent, 2000. Retrieved 10.03.2013 from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/ cultureheritage/heritage/cemat/versionprincipes/Anglais.pdf
[21] The treaty of Lisbon, 2007. Retrieved 10.03.2013 from http://europa.eu/lisbon_treaty/index_en.htm
[22] Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion "Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength”, 2008. Retrieved 10.03.2013 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0616:FIN:EN:PDF
[23] Europe 2020 Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth”, 2010. Retrieved 10.03.2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/ COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf
[24] Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030, 2010. Retrieved 10.01.2014 from http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/ B7A5865F-0D1B-42AE-A838-FBA4CA31674D/0/Latvia_2010.pdf
[25] National Development Plan for 2014 – 2020, 2012. Retrieved 10.01.2014 from http://www.pkc.gov.lv/images/NAP2020% 20dokumenti/NDP2020_English_Final.pdf
[26] Regional Policy Framework for 2013 – 2019, 2013. Retrieved 10.01.2014 from http://www.mk.gov.lv/en/mk/darbibu-reglamentejosie-dokumenti/straujumas-valdibas-deklaracija-eng/
[27] G. Adell, Theories and Models of the Peri-Urban Interface: a Changing Conceptual Landscape. Development Planning Unit, UCL: London, 1999.
[28] S. Snoxell, An Overview of the Literature on Linkages Between Communities in Building, Connecting and Sharing Knowledge: A Dialogue on Linkages between Communities: Aspen Institute conference, 2005, 20.05.2013 from http://www.cprn.org/documents/36099_fr.pdf
[29] D.A. Rondinelli, K. Ruddle, Urbanisation and Rural Development: A Spatial Policy for Equitable Growth. Praeger, New York, 1978.