Stress Evaluation of Rotary Injector Pump Parts in MF285 Tractor Using Finite Element Method
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Stress Evaluation of Rotary Injector Pump Parts in MF285 Tractor Using Finite Element Method

Authors: M. Azadbakht, Y. Fadakar

Abstract:

Since fuel must be injected with appropriate pressure and time for accurate performance of diesel engines, then proper function of engine is influenced by accurate function of injector pump. At first total pump was designed by SolidWorks 2012 software. Then the total relationship of rotor, roller, internal cam ring, pole shoe and plunger in injector pump in MF285 tractor and their performance was shown. During suction state rollers connect with dents in internal cam ring and in pressure course pole shoes have drawer move in rotor and perform tappet action between rollers and plungers. The maximum stress was obtained by using analysis of finite element method. The maximum stress in contact surface of roller and internal cam ring and on roller surface. The maximum amount of this stress is 288.12 MPa. According to conducted analyses, the minimum value for safety factor is related to roller surface and it equals to 2.0477.

Keywords: Rotary injector pump, MF285 tractor, finite element, stress.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1090466

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3040

References:


[1] Anonymous, CAV distributor Type Fuel Injection Pumps, Type DPA, Instruction Book. Acton, London, W.3. Publication No, 2068/4.
[2] Anonymous, Stanadyne, Inc, Rotary Distributor Diesel Fuel Injection pump. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. National Historic Engineering Landmark, 1988.
[3] Anonymous, Moscow State Automobile & Road Technical University. Group Combustion Engines.
[4] N. Farzan, Injection System of Diesel Engine For Students And Repairmans of Diesel Engine. Tehran, Karno Pablication. 2002.
[5] A. Jafari, M. Khanali, H. Mobli, and A. Rajabipour, Stress analysis of front axle of JD 955 combine harvester under static loading. Journal oF Agriculture and Social Sciences. 02(3):133–135. 2006.
[6] R. Khodabakhshian kargar, M. Shakeri, And J. Baradaran, Statistical Study about Causes of Damage and Fault Detection for MF285. Third Lecture of Machinery Condition Monitoring and Fault Detection. Sharif University of Technology. 2008.
[7] N. Leon, P.O. Martinez and P. Aadaya. Reducing the weight of a frontal axle beam using experimental test procedures to fine tune FEA. 2nd Worldwide MSC Automotive Conference, Dearborn, Michigan. 2000.
[8] K.D. Mahanty, V. Manohar, B.S. Khomance and S. Nayak. Analysis and weight reduction of a tractor’s front axle. Tata Consultancy Services, India, Swarup Udgata, International Auto Limited, India. 2001.
[9] J. Maly, and E. Bazzaz. Design change from casting to welding for an axle casting. http://WWW.aveng.com/Paper_ MSC_03.pdf. 2003.
[10] R. Pandiyarajan, M.S. Starvin, K.C. Ganesh, Contact stress distribution of large diameter ball bearing using Hertzian Elliptical contact theory. Procedia Engineering 38: 264-269. 2012.
[11] M. Rasekh, M.R. Asadi, A. Jafari, And K. Kheiralipour, Obtaining Maximum Stresses in Different Parts of Tractor(MF285) Connecting Rods Using Finite Element Method. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 2009.
[12] Saatchi, A. and Edris, H. Steel Key. Arkan Danesh Publication. pp 22.
[13] J.E. Shigley, and C.R. Mischke, Mechanical Engineering Design. 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1989.